The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Steve Jobs: We Might Have To Get A Judge To Decide Beatles/Apple Music Case

Steve Jobs: We Might Have To Get A Judge To Decide Beatles/Apple Music Case

by , 11:00 AM EDT, September 18th, 2003

Steve Jobs is ready to take The Beatles all the way to court, according to an article in The Independent, a UK newspaper. It was revealed earlier this month that The Beatles' music label, Apple Corps, had sued Apple earlier this year over Apple's renewed entry to the music business. The lawsuit stems from earlier lawsuits and agreements between Apple Computer and Apple Corps on limitations on the computer maker from being able to compete in the music industry.

In comments that we believe came in a question and answer session with the press after the Apple Expo keynote in Paris on Tuesday, something that doesn't happen after the States-side shows, Steve Jobs told The Independent that any agreements in place with Apple Corps were made when he wasn't the boss, and that he interpreted them differently than The Beatles. Furthermore, he was happy to take it to court, if necessary. From the article:

Mr Jobs essentially dismissed the agreement's relevance yesterday, noting it was drawn up after he left the company in the mid-1980s, and before he returned to it in 1996.

"Apple Corporation and Apple [Computer] signed a legal agreement more than a decade ago. I wasn't there, and it says what each company can do with their trademark," he said. "I inherited that, and right now there's a disagreement about this. It's a trademark dispute... We might have to get a judge to decide on it."

There is more information in the full article at The Independent, including a note about Mr. Jobs playing a Johnny Cash cover of a Beatles song during the traditional music played before he ascended the stage for his keynote.

The Mac Observer Spin:

Coming from most executives (or attorneys), such a statement would usually be a PR move designed to let the opposing side know that you aren't afraid of them. Who knows if that was the case with Steve Jobs, but it's likely he was delivering a message of some sort, and it's certainly a tough stance.

Recent Headlines - Updated April 29th

Mon,12:40 PM
Three Ways to Protect your Apple Watch (and One Way Not To)
Thu,7:59 PM
Carl Icahn Isn’t Wrong about Apple in China
5:54 PM
House Passes Email Search Warrant Bill
3:20 PM
Roxio Toast 14 Titanium for Mac: $49
3:00 PM
Griffin’s BreakSafe USB-C Cable Replicates MagSafe For the Apple MacBook
2:32 PM
Bad Move: FBI won’t Share San Bernardino iPhone Hack with Apple
1:23 PM
Dr. Mac’s Deeper Look into Budget-Priced VR Headsets
12:00 PM
TMO Daily Observations 2016-04-28: The Developer Side of Apple Conferences
10:50 AM
CareKit’s Strong Suit may be Peer Support Apps
10:00 AM
The Best and Worst Analyst Questions from Apple’s Q2 2016 Conference Call
Wed,5:42 PM
Sheriff Says Death of Man in Apple HQ ‘Isolated,’ that No One Else Is at Risk
4:48 PM
John McAfee Invokes ‘Crazy Ones’ and Steve Jobs for Libertarian President Commercial
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!