The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
IBM To Centralize Desktop Services, Applications, & Data

IBM To Centralize Desktop Services, Applications, & Data

by , 8:00 AM EDT, May 12th, 2004

Back in the 60's and 70's, the word 'computer' was synonymous with the name 'IBM'; back then, room-filling centralized servers chugged away supporting hundreds, even thousands of workers who used terminals to get their work done. It wasn't pretty, but it worked very well, and there was no such thing as a virus or worm in an IBM mainframe.

Since then, IBM has tried, and ultimately failed, to find a place in the network computing paradigm that is popular today. While it set the standard on which today's PCs are still being built, IBM has all but abandoned the desktop market, yielding to fierce competition from more nimble players like Dell and HP.

But, because the giant is down, it does not mean that it is out of the desktop market. According to a report in ComputerWeekly.com, IBM is preparing to make a renewed assault of the desktop market, at least the software end of it. Using its server know-how, IBM will offer a server based environment that will allow almost any desktop, including Macs and mobile devices, to access applications, such as Microsoft Word, and data. From ComputerWeekly:

BM has announced a software strategy, with accompanying products, designed to circumvent Microsoft's lock on operating systems and productivity applications.

Updates to IBM's client, administration and portal software will allow everything from desktop PCs to smartphones to access the same data - including Microsoft Office data - using standards-based middleware instead of a Microsoft client.

The strategy is similar to the thin-client approach -- championed by Oracle and -- Sun Microsystems, which advocated the use of easily manageable terminals as an alternative to bulky, powerful, complex Windows PCs.

[...]

IBM said the software will be available first for Windows, Linux, Unix and mobile platforms such as the Symbian OS, with a Mac OS X version to follow later this year.

There's more information in the full article at ComputerWeekly.com.

The Mac Observer Spin:

Well now, here's an interesting turn of events. Looks like IBM has taken a page from Apple's playbook: If you can't beat them at their own game, change the rules.

By making what hardware is on the desktop inconsequential, IBM could refocus mountains of IT dollars to their servers, which even today, have enjoyed famed reliability.

IT folks win big because centralization of desktop environments means an easier time of managing that environment, and there is a strong possibility that security could greatly improve.

It interesting how, even in the IT world, things are cyclic; before the PC, everything was server based. If IBM has its way, everything will be server based again.

As for Apple, it's a good thing Steve Jobs decided to make a run for the IT market. The education Apple learns in that arena will be invaluable in the coming years as it grows that portion of its business. If Mr. Jobs is smart, and we know he is, he'll pay special attention to how IBM does in its new push.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:spragueg Posts: 8 Joined: 25 Jul 2001
Subject: Mac version to follow...

...most likely means it will a crappy 1.0 never again updated version that has holes and bugs just like so many other. The kind that companies release when they want thier sales poeple to be able to say the words "cross-platform." Why even bother with a mac version without simul-release?

Close Name:iggyb Posts: 112 Joined: 09 May 2003
Subject: Not sure it will work

With the way everything seems to be going towards the laptop, this may not be as successful as it looks on paper. Besides, it mentions how Oracle has been doing this. We have the Oracle Business Suite at our company, and it sucks rocks. However, because the company invested so much in resources to Oracle, it's hard to back out now. In other words, you also lose something from having decisions like this coming from a centralized server. If the product is no good, everybody is stuck with it anyway. And because centralized programs are so frappin' expensive, you're pretty much tied into it for the long run.

Close Name:jfbiii Posts: 109 Joined: 06 May 2004
Subject: jfbiii

"IT folks win big because centralization of desktop environments means an easier time of managing that environment, and there is a strong possibility that security could greatly improve."

Agreed, but is what IBM proposing to do really so different from pulling centralized desktop profiles? Or using RDC?

Close Name:Thierry Posts: 1 Joined: 12 May 2004
Subject: mmm... are they going to compete with Citrix ?

anyway.. as lots of windows PCs are used mainly as enterprise applications terminals, it seems logical for IBM to move toward some kind of "server centric" computing.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated July 6th

Mon, 5:50 PM
News - Counter-Rumor: Nvidia & Apple Doing “Just Fine”
5:28 PM
News - Arlington Police Release Video of Apple Store Shooter
4:40 PM
Deal Brothers - Apple Mac Pro 2.66GHz Intel Xeon Quad Core for $2,274.00 Delivered A/R
4:12 PM
Product News - Babylon Upgrade Adds New Translation Features to Mac Dictionary App
11:17 AM
Ted Landau's User Friendly View - Apple’s LED Cinema Display: A Too Short Story
11:11 AM
Product News - Photo Recovery for Mac Adds Photoshop Support
10:39 AM
Hot Forum Topic - iPhones in Education
8:47 AM
News - Apple Employee Injured in Store Shooting
Fri, 10:29 AM
News - Apple Warns of Learning Interchange Security Breach
7:30 AM
News - Happy Fourth of July!
Thu, 6:07 PM
TMO Scoop - Psystar Moves to Drop Bankruptcy Ahead of Apple Legal Battle
5:37 PM
News - Uncomfirmed Reports Say Apple & Nvidia On The Outs

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!