"...for the clean images your..."

You mean "you're."

"...credentials include the Indian Jones trilogy..."

Not familiar with that one. Ever seen "Indiana Jones?" It's quite good.

I know it's early, but come on, guys. don't make me link to Bob the Angry Flower.

hehe spelling poopoo

Quote

Anonymous wrote:
I know it's early, but come on, guys. don't make me link to Bob the Angry Flower.

Thanks, Guest! We appreciate the note and have patched it up for ya!

Might as well add to the thread - "pouring" should be "poring".

Oh get off of it.... I'm just amazed by the 379 terabytes of storage

I hang my head in shame. I'm not the Grammar Nazi I thought I was. I shall from now on be a 'Grammer" Nazi. I love Frasier.

Hi guys--
You mean "poring," as in "gazing intently," not "pouring" as in filling up another pitcher of beer before filing a web story.

Presume you've all seen the Apple / Shake logo in the LOTR credits? (Two Towers onwards atleast_

reword the article bryan

this is unfortunatly NOT THE ORIGINAL TRILOGY, but rather the special edition versions of the movie

for more information on this, you can visit www.originaltrilogy.com for more information, and the some 61000 people who think that the original versions of star wars, the empire strikes back and return on the jedi should be sold on dvd

once agian, this is the special edition version, not the original trilogy

sorry for the harsh tone, but i felt it necessary

now, if only lucas would make the original theatrical cuts available on DVD

its Lucas's film its up to him how he wants to portray it, get over that original trilogy crap!

im sorry if i believe the original theatrical cuts are an excellent piece of theatrical history. i also pity the person who cannot see that to be true, even if they were deemed incomplete.

im just asking for an accurate representation from a media outlet.

while perfection should be sought at every possible instance, it was a pure mistake that led to the discovery of some of the mathematical and scientific principles that are commonly used today.

to you guest, should we then throw out all history merely because the creator changes his or her mind

TRO

"<i>you can thank Lowry Digital and its 600 Power Mac G5s for the clean images you are watching on screen</i>"

Yeah ... because the quality of the images has soooo much to do with the operating system they were edited or rendered on.
If they were edited on IA32, *gasp* HEAVEN FORBID a Non-Apple branded product, the images would be so horrible, completely unviewable .. they'd just never look right on any 23" Apple screen now would they ?

<a href=http://demonwolfe.net/figure/and-best-online/detection.html>spy remove</a>

Quote

Anonymous wrote:
"<i>you can thank Lowry Digital and its 600 Power Mac G5s for the clean images you are watching on screen</i>"

Yeah ... because the quality of the images has soooo much to do with the operating system they were edited or rendered on.
If they were edited on IA32, *gasp* HEAVEN FORBID a Non-Apple branded product, the images would be so horrible, completely unviewable ...

lol...so like, when someone brings you a drink you don't say 'thank you' to them? After all, ANYONE could have brought you a drink, so why thank the one guy who did?

Come on...what's wrong with praising the equipment that got the job done? No one's saying another computer COULDN'T have done the job...do you think praising one thing is the same as critisizing everything else? geez...

* "I like crackers."

* "Dude, why do you hate cookies!??!"

Thanks, it was very interesting