The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
LinuxInsider: Macs Are Faster

LinuxInsider: Macs Are Faster

by , 6:00 PM EDT, October 1st, 2004

LinuxInsider has published an interesting editorial from Paul Murphy who asks which is faster, Macs or PCs? In answer to that question, he says: "The short answer can be based entirely on raw hardware capabilities, and that answer is pretty simple: the Mac wins hands down." He goes on to say:

For example, the NCSA "Tungsten" cluster computer built last year was recently upgraded to include 2,500 dual Xeon Dell Poweredge 1750 servers at 3.2 GHz. According to NCSA public affairs, this thing has a theoretical peak capacity of about 32 Tereflops and yields about 15.36 teraflops in operation -- meaning that each CPU contributes about 3.1 Gigaflops to actual throughput.

In contrast, the cluster built last year at Virginia Tech using 1,100 Mac desktops has a theoretical peak of about 18.2 Teraflops and initially benchmarked at 8.1 Teraflops to deliver a contribution of 3.7 Gigaflops per CPU.

Although that was 19 percent better than the most recent Dell Xeon's, later machines built with Apple's X-Serves do much better because they have fewer I/O bottlenecks. Thus the Mach5 cluster built by Colsa Corp. and the U.S. Army, uses 1,566 dual CPU X-serves to deliver an expected 15 Teraflops in sustained throughput. That's 4.8 Gigaflops per CPU -- more than 50 percent faster than the Xeon -- and that's with last year's 2.0 GHz G5.

It can be argued, of course, that this comparison isn't fair because the Xeon is an older 32 bit processor and not generationally comparable to the G5. It might be better, therefore, to compare the X-serve cluster to machines built using a more modern 64 bit processor like AMD's (NYSE: AMD) Opteron's. "Lightning," at Los Alamos National Laboratory , uses 2,816 Opterons to produce a peak of 11,264 or 4.0 Gigaflops per CPU -- 30 percent better than the Xeons, but still 20 percent less than the G5s.

The article in its entirety goes on to address many of the issues on what makes such comparisons difficult, as well as other related issues. Included in those issues is that despite his quantitative answers, many questions regarding which platform is better simply can not be unresolved. We recommend the full article as a good read.

The Mac Observer Spin:

That it comes from a Linux-focused publication just makes it that much more interesting. While we will continue to point out that Linux and Mac platforms face the same enemy, Windows, what's important is that this piece wasn't pumped out by a Mac fan site, but rather a site aimed at the Linux community. That said, it's a corporate-owned site, part of the E-Commerce Times network, and not a fan-driven site, so some of the impact is certainly lost.

Additionally, E-Commerce Times aims its publications more at the IT world than community-oriented sites like The Mac Observer, but that means that the article is raising issues of speed in front of an audience that could conceivably produce Switchers.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:zpok Posts: 80 Joined: 06 May 2004
Subject: on enemies

"While we will continue to point out that Linux and Mac platforms face the same enemy, Windows"...

Can't someone start a project on an open source GarageBand type program, so that we can send our linux brothers our best recreations of "We shall overcome"?

Serious, I liken mac and OSS to anything Windows, but "enemy"? Not if that means I'll have to throw out this really great mouse and fairly useable- and sadly, best of breed - piece of Office software.

I'm still hoping for a successful OSX native KDE port and a cool Quartz OOo but until then, I fear I can't live without Windows...

Rrrrrrant over...

Close Name:Guest
Subject: The article is wrong...

The Virginia Tech cluster has an operational speed of 10,28Tflops not 8,1Tflops..

This was in the unofficial first test, not in the official test of TOP500.org...

So, actually it's 4,67Glops per CPU.. (10.280Glops : 1100 : 2)

See here:
http://www.macobserver.com/article/2003/11/17.1.shtml

Bryan & MOB Readers, Read ME at www.faq-mac.com

coolkamio (@faq-mac.com)

(Sorry for my bad english..)

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
zpok wrote:
"While we will continue to point out that Linux and Mac platforms face the same enemy, Windows"...

Can't someone start a project on an open source GarageBand type program, so that we can send our linux brothers our best recreations of "We shall overcome"?

Serious, I liken mac and OSS to anything Windows, but "enemy"? Not if that means I'll have to throw out this really great mouse and fairly useable- and sadly, best of breed - piece of Office software.

I'm still hoping for a successful OSX native KDE port and a cool Quartz OOo but until then, I fear I can't live without Windows...

Rrrrrrant over...


Huh? OS X supports up to 5 button mice, with scroll wheel. and office is available for os x... am I missing something?

Close Name:Guest
Subject: On enemies

How can you call Microsoft when it have been proved that Windows crashes on purpose sometimes when you run QuickTime, Apple invention?

Close Name:zpok Posts: 80 Joined: 06 May 2004
Subject: right some wrongs

Oooops, I've been mixing MicroSoft with Windows arbitrarily. What I wanted to say - inexpertly - was that
1) as a consumer I don't feel enmity towards Windows - I just don't use it if I can help it
2) Microsoft (not Windows) does have some good products, like Office X on the mac and the nice mouse me and my wife are using...
3) I hardly see Linux as the enemy, I think the idea of Linux and OSS is pretty cool even as the software mostly isn't (for me, for me, personal opinion)...

And as long as the alternatives for Office aren't there yet, I can't wish for Microsoft to disappear...

Sorry, my bad

btw: I know the hardware division of MS has little to do with MS the software giant, and I know quite a lot about MS's tactics which leads a lot of people to logically see them as enemies. I let my consumer side speak for once... and while it's true that MS is one dirty player, it isn't the only one. None of the "others" are "nice". Maybe they are from a consumer stand point, but in that particular universe, MicroSoft is plenty "nice" too, giving away free browsers and mediaplayers

For instance, OSS is very lax in giving past developers and creative people credit. I'm not talking legalese here, just stating they copy a lot of good ideas - like everybody else - and then they go "long live Linux, the rest sux", just like everybody else. They as a community are not nicer, just cheaper. And some of their users are worse in attitude than the most stupid mac user who thinks he's god's gift to computer users because of his hardware choices...
And certainly Apple is not a "nice" company. They can be as arrogant as the rest, and then some... Ask any developer or hapless webby with the wrong domain name who's come across their legal team. And while I really love Jobs' distortions and the Jobs-Ives tandem of great useful toy-making, you have to always be very careful when translating their specs and claims to the real world - like with every computer company. I remember the "toast" campaign, and loved it, seeing those pentiums burn burn burn, but couldn't ignore the fact that in reality, the one where I sadly happened to live in, my friend's PC ran circles around my mac without going woosh at all. And he had the cool games. And his PC while being a piece of junk had better multimedia than mine, even if he had to sell his soul to use it. And his software was cheap. Thank god things got better eventually...

In short: the consumer in me tells me to be smart and use what's useful and leave the wars to the players.

Even shorter, I felt the need to rant...

View Name:RealityCheck -   Troll Posts: 392 Joined: 06 May 2004
Subject: Victims of RDF Overdose-PC 12x Faster Than Dual 2.5 G5
Close Name:aaronsullivan Posts: 87 Joined: 22 Oct 2001
Subject: RealityCheck's competition

That's a funny joke, RC. I didn't know you had a sense of humor.
Comes with no software.
It's more expensive.
Baseless claims about speed.
Comes with Windows, the most fragile, frustrating, dangerous, maintenance heavy OS ever!

Try clustering these babies. What a joke.

Close Name:Jason Varner -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 1125 Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Subject: Re: Victims of RDF Overdose-PC 12x Faster Than Dual 2.5 G5

Quote
RealityCheck wrote:
Check the facts:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/9/emw162566.htm

Read it and weep Mac zealots.


::Reads linked article::

::Weeps::

So the rest of you don't have to read this thing, I'll summarize. (and please, if you don't believe me, read it yourself. I have nothing to hide here.)

The linked article is a press release (emediawire is a prweb.com website) by one Michael's Computers out of Marina del Rey, California, promoting his MX8, "World's PROVEN only Personal Computer to perform operations instantly." To give a taste of the press release, here's a few quotes.

Quote
Michael's Computers wrote:
ATI's x800 Video Card is IN! And you NEED this human reality visual card! Graphics are ultra REAL! 65% FASTER than previous Radeon 9800XT Pro!


Quote
Michael's Computers wrote:
That's why those who use Michael's Computers are the only fortunate customers to experience near CLICK INSTANT performance.


As for RealityCheck's claim of '12x faster', I see only this remark.

Quote
Michael's Computers wrote:
Featuring the NEW Intel 3600MHz Pentium 4 'E' processor, it outperforms it's nearest competition 12X faster than Apple's G5 Dual 2.5GHz!.


Erm, excuse me. Benchmarks?

As for RealityCheck's claim of 'good price', I find this:

Quote
Michael's Computers wrote:


Oops, wait. I don't actually see any price in this press release. I suppose I could call or mail Michael's Computers, but I frankly don't feel like spending the time to debunk further. Ah well.

Jason

Close Name:AFCdtLoeb Posts: 2533 Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Subject:

Do not feed or reply to the trolls please.

View Name:RealityCheck -   Troll Posts: 392 Joined: 06 May 2004
Subject: Janson, Here's The Prices
Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Factually, the stuff the Mac-department of Microsoft pumps out for Mac is simply better than the PC-version of Office.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Michaels Computers

Lets see these Wintel one chip wonders outperform a Dual 2.5 GHz Mac with 8 Gigs of ram running a 64 bit app or two. Anyone can beat a Mac by 12 times scrolling an Office document or searching a faster hard drive. What bullsh*t.

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject:

Interesting. At another link, Michael's claims to be 128% faster than the dual G5, not 12x.
And as far as I know, there is no "United States Navy Sidewinder Missile Division in California". There is a program office in China Lake. And the USG is not prone to buying white box machines. They buy from a supplier like Dell or Compaq.

SATA-X? It's called a RAID. There is no 600GB SATA drive. It is only achievable with a RAID (does not call it that, though). Specialized XPPro kernal? I don't think so. On is 7.7 seconds? Highly doubtful.

The guy is a scam. Other than on his own website, I can find no hard evidence that anybody has ever actually received a machine from him.

Leave it to RC to post a scam as evidence.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: if you remember

check out slashdot and pcworld and wired and even better, register for "micheal computer", this guy is the biggest scam in all of the tech industry. he claims outrageous performance and cant deliver, literally can't deliver. this guy runs the scam out of his little house in Cali, micheal probalby is RC, that would explain the stupidity that spews from the catastrophically dismal and naive wound in his face.

Close Name:JTuckerJX Posts: 279 Joined: 01 May 2003
Subject:

I wonder how many people actually buy AppleCare. I was brand spankin new to owning a Mac, my wife had never even seen one before. I called tech support ONCE, and that was over an AOL problem (at the time I worked for them and didn't have a choice). I haven't had a single problem and don't expect to. BTW, who in their right freaking mind would offer an 8 year warranty in the computer world? IMO this guy would be bankrupt by the end of the 8 year period b/c of the amount of computers he would be getting back.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: AppleCare

I bought AppleCare and have used it several times. I'd say never buy a TiBook. And also Don't buy AppleCare get some other sort of care. One that also includes some accidental damage cover.

Close Name:slinky259 Posts: 91 Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Subject:

Oh man.. Michael's computers. At one point, he was advertising computers with a processor that didn't even exist (not sure if it even does now)!

Check out the Tom's hardware link up there.

Close Name:jimothy Posts: 612 Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Subject: "Facts"

Quote
RealityCheck wrote:

Check the facts:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/9/emw162566.htm

I don't think this word ("facts") means what you think it means, RC.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: michaels...

i love the first question on the FAQ...

Q: When a client says “But what about support? We have always chosen Dell"

A: (a bunch of lies about the Navy clipped out) "I only choose Michael's Computers over any other company because it’s far better to know the maker and someone you can trust and is a Christian.”

... i am sooooooo sure the Navy has a contract with this guy. looks like a 1-person operation at most. he probably built a machine for his navy recruiter buddy up the street and qualified that as meaning 'i build computers for the US Navy.'

it's been awhile since i've since BS this rich. even funnier that it was used to supposedly prove a point... hahahahhaaha! nice one.

check it out... http://michaelscomputers.com/faqs.htm

Close Name:cintyram Posts: 1 Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Subject: sincere appeal to reality check

hi rc,
who ever you are i used to appreciate some of your posts as they bring a different view from the rest;
but now a days you are becoming a complete out and out troll and mis-informer. if you want people to take your posts seriously, please post only good links; do not try to debunk people; any way i hope it makes you feel good that not every one here hates you; but i for one do appreciate that you are the devil's advocte for this site ; please try to keep your position by writing only valid and relevant posts;
cheers
.....

Close Name:Jon Stanard -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 2038 Joined: 27 Jul 2001
Subject: Re: Not this guy again

Anyone intersted, READ THIS LINK!! Slaughters this thing. You read it too RC, and let us know what FACTS you "think" now.


Quote
Anonymous wrote:
http://www4.tomshardware.com/column/20040317/too_good_to_be_true-01.html


Nick M.

Close Name:Nom Posts: 58 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Typo?

"many questions regarding which platform is better simply can not be unresolved" - do you mean "resolved"?

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Michael's Computers

In response to the question as to whether anyone has actually received a machine from Michael's Computers, I have. I purchased a laptop machine from him about a year ago and it arrived in a timely fashion and has performed pretty well overall. I did my own windows installation and tuning, so I have it moving pretty fast.

My problem is not with the speed of the machines or the advertising, but rather with Michael's warranties and after-purchase support. I've had to replace a power supply under warranty which required sending the machine back at my own expense and being without it for three weeks. Now my DVD-RW drive won't open without using a paperclip to force eject and I have not gotten any response to my numerous emails. His phone defaults to a busy signal and his email frequently bounces.

Long story short, I've filed a complaint with BBB and intend to examine action through the FTC, ICC, etc., if he doesn't honor the warranty and make good.

I only went with this company because the guy is a member of a forum (www.dodgeforum.com) that I frequent. Others on the site recommended these machines and I didn't do my homework. I'm wiser for it now, and recommend that nobody do business with Michael's Computers.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated November 22nd

Fri, 7:07 PM
Games - Soccer Sim Championship Manager 2010 Released for Mac
6:47 PM
Games - EA Publishes Original Monopoly for iPhone
6:15 PM
News - Original Apple I on Ebay for $50K, w/Letter from Steve Jobs
6:11 PM
Games - New iPhone Games: Secret of the Lost Cavern Ep 1, New DJ Nights, More
5:47 PM
Games - Star Trek D-A-C Game Headed to the Mac Next Month
4:57 PM
Product News - TidBITS Releases “Take Control of Syncing Data in Snow Leopard”
4:26 PM
John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 11/20) Stationery Pads Go Poof
2:59 PM
Free on iTunes - Musée du Louvre, Art Lite, SketchBook Mobile X and More.
1:50 PM
Deal Brothers - Acer P215H bmid 21.5” Widescreen LCD Monitor:  $139.99
11:24 AM
TMO Appearances - Jeff Gamet Shares More Holiday Gift Ideas on MacJury
10:43 AM
Product News - Cocktail 4.5 for Leopard Adds QuickLook Cache Clearing
10:06 AM
News - Hack Enables Mac OS X 10.6.2 on Netbooks

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!