The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple Admits USB Dominance Too Big to Ignore; Experts See it as Right Move

TMO Reports - Apple Admits USB Dominance Too Big to Ignore; Experts See it as Right Move

by , 9:10 AM EST, February 25th, 2005

Universal Serial Bus (USB) 2.0 is the king of connectivity and Apple Computer acknowledged that fact Wednesday by no longer including a FireWire cable with its new line of iPod digital media devices. Most industry experts agree Apple's decision was the right one in a marketplace where USB is standard equipment on every PC sold today.

In announcing new models of the iPod color and a second-generation iPod mini, Apple dropped the FireWire cable as standard equipment. Although iPod users can still use Firewire to transfer data and charge their devices, consumers must now pay an additional US$19 for the cable.

The move is part of Apple's gradual shift to use USB 2.0 as the defacto standard on the iPod, which is far more common in the Windows world.

"I think it was a prudent decision, as well as a cost effective one," Mark Margevicius, research director at the technology analysis firm Gartner, Inc., told The Mac Observer.

"USB allows for so much more diversity," Mr. Margevicius said. "It was a common sense decision for Apple, much like making iTunes available for Windows. You can't overlook what the marketplace is using.

"In the PC market in 2004, high-speed USB has nearly saturated the desktop market, and now comprises over three-quarters of the notebook market."

Mr. Margevicius also believes another factor in favor of USB 2.0 is its ability to now recharge via a USB connection -- something that wasn't available on iPods and PCs until just the past two years.

When comparing FireWire and USB 2.0, the speed at which data transfers is roughly the same. USB 2.0 has a theoretical top speed of 480 megabits per second while FireWire 400, or IEEE 1394, tops out at 400 Mbps. A faster version of FireWire, known as IEEE 1394.b or FireWire 800, is roughly twice the speed of FireWire and USB 2.0. It is currently offered on Apple's Power Mac G5 models and offered on a selected few Windows-based PCs.

But that is where the similarities end.

USB 2.0 is standard fare on the majority of Windows-based personal computers available today. Mr. Margevicius said market penetration of USB 2.0 is "virtually 100%" of all personal computers sold today and either it or USB version 1.0 has been in Windows-based PCs since 2000. USB 2.0 has been standard on iMacs since September of 2003. When the iPod debuted in 2001, it used only FireWire. When Apple released Windows-ready iPods, USB was not supported. It wasn't until April 2003 that Apple first offered iPods with USB 2.0 for an additional $19.

As for FireWire, it is often an option on Windows-ready PCs and its adoption on third-party hard drives and other peripherals has not been as profound as USB 2.0, which is found on everything from digital cameras to flash drives. While FireWire 400 is prevalent, Mr. Margevicius figures it is only available on about 25% of PCs sold today.

Another factor, according to Mr. Margevicius is adoption of USB 2.0 by third-party peripheral makers. According to the latest In-Stat forecast, the number of USB-enabled devices will rise from 705.7 million in 2004 to 2.1 billion in 2009 -- everything from hard drives and printers, to coffee cup warmers and adjustable reading lights.

"The more USB-ready devices that are out there just solidifies its acceptance and use," Mr. Margevicius said.

Another possible future factor: The growth potential of Wireless USB 1.0. Mr. Mergevicius predicts Wireless USB will make its debut in the PC market late in 2005 in the form of dongles that hook into USB ports.

"Wireless USB is a technology every PC product maker is looking at for the future," he said. "I'm sure Apple is too."

Pricing a factor in Apple's decision

Although the analysts TMO talked to agree the most popular connection standard won out fair and square, all agreed the issue of saving money had to have been a major factor Apple considered when deciding to cut its Firewire shackles.

"USB is cheaper to install for a manufacturer," said Brian O’Rourke, an analyst with In-Stat who has done extensive research on USB adoption. "It can often be installed at a much cheaper price because many of the components and processors USB works with are already configured to work with it."

Mr. O’Rourke's prime example: The fact that USB 2.0 is integrated into the core logic chipset -- known as SouthBridge -- of all Intel and AMD processors used in Windows-based personal computers. "That makes building in USB 2.0 much easier and cheaper for PC makers," he said.

So how much is Apple saving? According to one analyst who watches component pricing for a living, the savings is a little less than $1.

"I'd say Apple is saving about a dollar by dropping the Firewire cable," IdaRose Sylvester, an analyst with the research firm IDC, told TMO. "While that doesn't sound like a lot of money, it adds up to millions over time."

Firewire lovers fight back

No matter what the reasons, some Mac owners are upset with Apple's decision.

Gary Reich of Annapolis, Md. was so upset, he started an online petition saying "users and supporter" of Apple products are "dismayed" about the Apple decision.

"It is very unfortunate that you have left your faithful out in the dark on this one," Mr. Reich writes on the petition site. "it seems wholly irrational to remove it from the people who provide the support, promotion and word of mouth 'advertising' that provides your company with the millions of 'switchers' you want each year, free of charge."

As of Friday morning, more than 2,800 people had signed the online petition calling on Apple to again include a FireWire cable with iPods.

But despite the concerns of many, fearful that Apple might be ringing the death knell of FireWire, fear not.

"Apple is not going to get rid of Firewire," said Jupiter Research analyst Joe Wilcox. "While USB acceptance was an important factor, Apple has made a cost decision here. It was simply the more prudent strategy. But Firewire is not dead."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Close Name:jimothy Posts: 612 Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
Apple doomed it when FW800 required a different connector. It won't last that much longer as an audio or DV port. Audio is already moving to USB2. If USB can get up to the sustained throughput, not just burst speeds, of Firewire for DV streaming, that's all it will take to kiss it good-bye no matter how fast FW gets. That's the only thing keeping FW alive now.

Well, sure, IF USB could do that, then Firewire's survival might be threatened. (Though I'd remove the cavaet, "no matter how fast FW gets." Firewire's increased bandwidth will always appeal to certain industries, such as HDTV production).

As far as audio, I believe USB has only pushed Firewire aside for consumer audio, such as Dolby 5.1 adapters (sound card alternatives, popular for laptops), but not for pro-audio. Then again, I'm a software developer, not an audio guy, so I could be mistaken.

Close Name:pyxl8 Posts: 171 Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Subject: Only slightly better off than we were b4

The iPod mini I bought in November (which included the Firewire cable and AC Adapter) cost $249.

To get the same functionality with an iPod mini I buy TODAY for $199, I need to spend $19 and $29 for the now-optional FW and AC (total: $247). So, not only will I save $2 vs the previous model, I now get an iPod with increased battery life and a slightly different (trendier?) color. Not a bad improvement for 2 bucks.

While I agree with Apple's decision purely on a business level (cutting the price, and catering to the (PC) majority's port preference), it DOES come off as a slap in the face of the loyal Mac faithful. And cutting the price gets lots more good press than just saying "hey, we've increased the battery life!"

OMG, 19 bucks??!!! Me? I'll get over it...somehow.

"It ain't personal...it's just business."

-Ken P

Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1960 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: Firewire is dead-end technology

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
If USB can get up to the sustained throughput, not just burst speeds, of Firewire for DV streaming, that's all it will take to kiss it good-bye no matter how fast FW gets. That's the only thing keeping FW alive now.

Joe Futral


Right...I don't think you'll be seeing DVCPROHD over USB 2 any time soon.

HD on firewire 400 is alive and well, however:
http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/codecs.html

Close Name:Guest
Subject: The New Analyst?

Quote

But despite the concerns of many, fearful that Apple might be ringing the death knell of FireWire, fear not.

"Apple is not going to get rid of Firewire," said Jupiter Research analyst Joe Wilcox. "While USB acceptance was an important factor, Apple has made a cost decision here. It was simply the more prudent strategy. But Firewire is not dead."


It seems like TMO has been doing this kind of quote alot just in the past several weeks. When did third party analysts become an authoritative source of information? Two months ago all they did was sell sound bytes in an effort to sound like they knew what the were talking about.

Close Name:pyxl8 Posts: 171 Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Subject:

Quote
jimothy wrote:
As far as audio, I believe USB has only pushed Firewire aside for consumer audio, such as Dolby 5.1 adapters (sound card alternatives, popular for laptops), but not for pro-audio. Then again, I'm a software developer, not an audio guy, so I could be mistaken.


Firewire is VERY alive and well in pro-audio circles, so yes, I agree that a Firewire Death Knell is waaaay off-base. We thought MIDI wouldn't last this long either!

-Ken P

-Ken

Close Name:Guest
Subject: USB 2.0 or 1.1 for iPOD

Although Apple claims that the iPOD does not support USB 1.1, it does, although the speed is slower. The iPOD can even recharge over usb 1.1

Close Name:Mace Posts: 9604 Joined: 07 Aug 2003
Subject:

Apple had made a purely business decision. As a Mac user, I'm not very happy with this decision too. However, as an AAPL investor, I applaud the decision.

Close Name:Sobriety Check Posts: 7 Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Subject:

Quote
why should PCs ditch the PS/2 ports? what kind of amazing transfer speeds do mice and keyboards need? the only advantage to USB keyboards and mice is being able to plug the mouse into the keyboard, or using the keyboard as a USB hub. many people use USB keyboards anyway, and it's nice that PCs at least give you some legacy ports.

PS/2 would be a perfect addition to the mac mini.


I can think of a couple of very good reasons to stay right the hell away from PS/2 keyboard and mouse connectors.

1) Two holes, exactly the same, right next to each other, but not compatible. Exceedingly stupid. If there are two plugs, both serving as low-speed inputs for similar devices, why oh why can't they be interchangable?

2) PS/2 controller chips all seem to be broken, sometimes you can hot plug keyboard/mouse, but sometimes you have to reboot to get them recognised again. Linux is better at handling this than Windows, but still not perfect.

PS/2 is an awful, awful mess, and should be kept as far as possible from any device intended to be operated by a human being. It's no doubt caused more support calls than any other mistake short of installing Windows.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

All your firewire cables are belong to us now.

Soon, all iPods will too, very soon!

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Firewire

Well if I'm not mistaken Firewire, the term coined by Apple for IEEE1394, was also "progressed" into the mainstream by Apple. So they're bashing their own prodigy.

As far as a dead-end technology? The latest audio/video receivers are now using IEEE1394 - "Firewire" as a mode of connecting DVD's, CD's, Media Players, Monitors, etc. to the receiver. So . . . dead? I think not.

In a related article - I think here - they figured out that Apple is making a 40% profit on the iPod and by dumping the Firewire cable making more now. So say what you will, it's all about the bottom line, or year end bonuses, or making Apple enough money to buy TiVo.

The best argument I have read here so far is to ship the units without the cable and let the buyer choose. Or have a USB model and a FW model. But the duality of it might cost too much, so I wouldn't hold my breath on this option.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: no more power adapter

The power adapter connection is FireWire, it is no longer included in the box. Plan on paying the $50 again if you ever plan on traveling with your iPod away from a computer to charge it with.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
The power adapter connection is FireWire, it is no longer included in the box. Plan on paying the $50 again if you ever plan on traveling with your iPod away from a computer to charge it with.


The new iPod photos do come with a power adapter - with a USB2 connector.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Online Petitions

"Is there any history of success with these online petitions? They seem quite silly to me."

Hey, don't be a tool Jimothy... if someone has the gumption to get off their keister and actually DO something, then more power to them I say.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: SOLUTION: They could include the FW cable at APPLE STORES...

Just a thought... since this is a PC-Mac divide issue (most PCs have USB 2, many Macs in use today do not), why not simply ship two different kinds of boxes?

The boxes going to the Circuit Citys, Best Buys, Comp USAs etc. could have the USB 2 cable, but no Firewire, since thats mostly a PC crowd shopping there. The boxes going to the Apple Stores could have both cables, since thats where the Mac folks shop.

This would have two benefits-

1) Apple would still see significant cost savings, since the majority of iPods are not sold at Apple Stores

2) It would drive traffic to Apple Stores, since the savvy would go there for the better deal. And while they're there, they might just pick up something else they need, offsetting the additional cost of the FW cable.

The only downside is that Best Buy etc. might be mildly miffed that the Apple Store box is a slightly better deal. But so long as the iPod is selling like hotcakes for them and making them tons of cash, I'm sure they'll find a way to live with it.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Better standard

As well as daisychaining, target mode etc Firewire is a preferred method for offloading digital media from cards, cameras etc. USB interface is clunky & slow. FW 800 is faster will be a great shame if it is abandoned

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Firewire is dead-end technology

Considering that FW400 is a 4 or 6 wire cable and FW800 is a 9 wire cable, I think that changing the connector was kind of necessary. Besides, 9 pin to 6 pin and 9 pin to 4 pin cables are available.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Mac idiots.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Radio Shlock

Quote
algr wrote:
I don't have a problem with Apple not including a Firewire cable, but charging $19 for a dollar cable is dishonest.

Bought any video cables from Radio Shack recently?


Nope, the only reason to shop at Radio Shlock is the fact that they're conveniently located almost everywhere.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Radio Shlock

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Quote
algr wrote:
I don't have a problem with Apple not including a Firewire cable, but charging $19 for a dollar cable is dishonest.

Bought any video cables from Radio Shack recently?


Nope, the only reason to shop at Radio Shlock is the fact that they're conveniently located almost everywhere.


Mac idiots.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: mindlessness

What makes you think that a customer base FAR less than than than Wintel PC's REALLY had the effect of keeping usb alive? I couldn't possibly been that USB was made a STANDARD for ALL pc's! But whatever, I won't change your mind, APPLE invented the universe ya know...

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Rude Winblows trolls

"Mac idiots"

Oh, do f**k off and go back to slurping Bill Gates' schlong like you were doing all afternoon, ok 'Windows idiot'?

Man, the nerve of some losers, I tell ya.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Rude Winblows trolls

I own a Power Mac G5, and I think your all whining like little bitches. You got to pay to play. If you don't like it buy something else.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: 'mindlessness'

"What makes you think that a customer base FAR less than than than Wintel PC's REALLY had the effect of keeping usb alive? I couldn't possibly been that USB was made a STANDARD for ALL pc's! But whatever, I won't change your mind, APPLE invented the universe ya know..."

Sigh. Poor PC users can't credit Apple for anything, even when it's obviously true and benefits THEM.

Back before Apple adoped USB, it was effectively going NOWHERE on the PC side of things. A spokesperson promoting USB made a comment that trying to get PC makers to adopt a new standard was like "herding cats". It took Apple's no-nonsense, total adoption of USB to show the way... eventually the PC makers followed their lead and now we've got USB everywhere.

What is so hard about this to grasp? Its simply history, no more, no less. What's next, you're going to tell us that Windows 1.0 was released before the Macintosh?

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Rude Winblows trolls"

"I own a Power Mac G5, and I think your all whining like little bitches."

I own a Cray supercomputer, and I think you're whining like a little bitch about little bitches.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Online Firewire Petition Approaching 4000 Signatures...

http://www.petitiononline.com/firewire/petition.html

Go on and tell Apple what you think.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: ADB Connection

ADB = "Apple Desktop Bus" - it's the same as the older connector used by PCs... DB-9 or something, but it's not compatible.

Many PCs still come with that "round" connector these days. And USB 2.0 is NOT 100% installed on new PCs, especially not low-end ones which still sell like girl-guide cookies.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

"Mac idiots."

Yeah, that'll take away Apple's success. Good work.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
"Mac idiots."

Apple's success is gone. Homework.


?

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Anonymous wrote:
"Mac idiots."

Apple's success is gone. Homework.


?



Yeah, I agree, that really doesn't make any sense at all. I guess the Windows trolls dont really have their hearts in it anymore.

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
Just a thought... since this is a PC-Mac divide issue (most PCs have USB 2, many Macs in use today do not), why not simply ship two different kinds of boxes?

The boxes going to the Circuit Citys, Best Buys, Comp USAs etc. could have the USB 2 cable, but no Firewire, since thats mostly a PC crowd shopping there. The boxes going to the Apple Stores could have both cables, since thats where the Mac folks shop.

This would have two benefits-

1) Apple would still see significant cost savings, since the majority of iPods are not sold at Apple Stores

2) It would drive traffic to Apple Stores, since the savvy would go there for the better deal. And while they're there, they might just pick up something else they need, offsetting the additional cost of the FW cable.

The only downside is that Best Buy etc. might be mildly miffed that the Apple Store box is a slightly better deal. But so long as the iPod is selling like hotcakes for them and making them tons of cash, I'm sure they'll find a way to live with it.


Although an interesting idea, it is a logistical nightmare. Harkens back to the day of the Centris vs Performa lines that Apple did way back: "This is the same as that except that this part is different, otherwise..."

Simplicity in the supply chain is key to success in commodities.

Close Name:Mace Posts: 9604 Joined: 07 Aug 2003
Subject:

Quote
Intruder wrote:
... Simplicity in the supply chain is key to success in commodities.
Agree.

Close Name:Black Cardinal Posts: 2 Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Subject: PC keyboards still use PS/2 connectors

That "ADB" port is actually a PS/2 keyboard connector, and it is still very much the standard in the PC world. USB keyboards are not very common yet. USB mice are just beginning to replace PS/2 mice. ADB was never available on PCs, it is the "Apple Desktop Bus" and was only ever on Macs.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: IT'S NOT ADB, IT'S PS-2

Good lord. Just because ports looks the same doesn't mean they are. I understand the users of our great Macs (yes, I have a rev.A powermac g5 dual 2Ghz and the most recent rev powerbook 15") aren't really techies but PLEASE, PLEASE make sure you know what you're bitching about before you bitch. (I switched to Apple 1.5 years ago for productivity reasons. I got tired of the constant varii and spyware issues. I am a network and systems administrator by trade and get rather annoyed when either side slams the other with "facts" which aren't facts.)

Close Name:rascal Posts: 15 Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
Apple doomed it when FW800 required a different connector. It won't last that much longer as an audio or DV port. Audio is already moving to USB2. If USB can get up to the sustained throughput, not just burst speeds, of Firewire for DV streaming, that's all it will take to kiss it good-bye no matter how fast FW gets. That's the only thing keeping FW alive now.

Joe Futral


erm no its not. firewire has other advantages apart from speed. its the industry standard for video and that won't change overnight - its also what almost every Mac user is going to use for external hard disks etc..

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: IT'S NOT ADB, IT'S PS-2

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Good lord. Just because ports looks the same doesn't mean they are. I understand the users of our great Macs (yes, I have a rev.A powermac g5 dual 2Ghz and the most recent rev powerbook 15") aren't really techies but PLEASE, PLEASE make sure you know what you're bitching about before you bitch. (I switched to Apple 1.5 years ago for productivity reasons. I got tired of the constant varii and spyware issues. I am a network and systems administrator by trade and get rather annoyed when either side slams the other with "facts" which aren't facts.)


Interestingly, though, an ADB extension cable makes a great Svideo cable. They use the same pinout and configuration.

And no, ADB and PS/2 are not the same. You are quite correct about that. Pinout (and I believe connector size and layout) is different.

Close Name:Black Cardinal Posts: 2 Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Subject: Sorry

I should have read further down before posting. Then I would have seen that the ADB vs PS/2 issue was already well covered. My bad.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated November 22nd

Fri, 7:07 PM
Games - Soccer Sim Championship Manager 2010 Released for Mac
6:47 PM
Games - EA Publishes Original Monopoly for iPhone
6:15 PM
News - Original Apple I on Ebay for $50K, w/Letter from Steve Jobs
6:11 PM
Games - New iPhone Games: Secret of the Lost Cavern Ep 1, New DJ Nights, More
5:47 PM
Games - Star Trek D-A-C Game Headed to the Mac Next Month
4:57 PM
Product News - TidBITS Releases “Take Control of Syncing Data in Snow Leopard”
4:26 PM
John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 11/20) Stationery Pads Go Poof
2:59 PM
Free on iTunes - Musée du Louvre, Art Lite, SketchBook Mobile X and More.
1:50 PM
Deal Brothers - Acer P215H bmid 21.5” Widescreen LCD Monitor:  $139.99
11:24 AM
TMO Appearances - Jeff Gamet Shares More Holiday Gift Ideas on MacJury
10:43 AM
Product News - Cocktail 4.5 for Leopard Adds QuickLook Cache Clearing
10:06 AM
News - Hack Enables Mac OS X 10.6.2 on Netbooks

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!