The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple Wins Initial Ruling Against 3 News Web Sites (UPDATE)

Apple Wins Initial Ruling Against 3 News Web Sites (UPDATE)

by , 1:00 AM EST, March 4th, 2005

Apple Computer can force three Mac news Web sites to disclose where they got confidential information about about an unreleased Apple product, a San Jose, Calif. judge tentatively ruled Thursday. A full hearing on the matter is set for Friday.

Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg refused to protect the publishers of AppleInsider.com, PowerPage.org, and ThinkSecret.com from Apple's request that the three Mac news sites turn over records that could disclose who their sources were regarding stories about an un-announced audio hardware product code named "Asteroid" or "Q97".

Kleinberg offered no explanation for the preliminary ruling, which was handed down March 2, but revealed in court papers Thursday.

"We're disappointed that the tentative ruling was a denial," said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney Kurt Opsahl, in a prepared statement. "We will now concentrate on making our case before Judge Kleinberg, Friday.'

Mr. Opsahl previously said that if the court decision did not go in its favor, the EFF would seek a writ from the Calif. Court of Appeals that would protect the journalists from disclosing information about their sources.

EFF lawyers argued Thursday that while the Uniform Trade Secrets Act holds those who receive trade secrets liable if they knowingly disseminate confidential information, Web sites and their journalists are protected by the California Constitution, the California Evidence Code, and the First Amendment and that the case threatens the basic freedoms of the press. The subpoenas should not be permitted because Internet journalists deserve the full protection of traditional print and broadcast journalists, the brief said.

In December, Apple filed a seven-page "John Doe" lawsuit and requested the owners of three Mac news Web sites produce all "documents relating to the identity of any individual or individuals who have knowledge regarding the source of posts on its site disclosing information about the product."

On February 16, Apple agreed to not serve subpoenas on the three Mac news sites seeking information on who allegedly leaked product secrets until the court held Thursday's hearing on the matter.

Recent Headlines - Updated April 21st

Tue,10:09 AM
Google Kills YouTube for 2nd Gen Apple TV, Older iOS Devices
9:10 AM
Jeff Gamet Talks Cloud Services at Denver Apple Pi
Mon,6:42 PM
How to Create and Use Network Locations for Mac
6:09 PM
Some Apple Watch Orders ‘Preparing for Shipment’
5:58 PM
Announcing TMO’s New Product Scoring System
4:49 PM
Microsoft Office Mastery Bundle: $49
4:31 PM
How Bob Levitus Learned to Blow Stuff Up Without Risking Life and Limb
4:05 PM
FitPort for iOS: A Beautifully Designed Fitness Monitoring App
2:42 PM
Twitter’s New ‘DM Everyone’ Sucks, But it’s Off by Default
1:14 PM
TMO Daily Observations 2015-04-20: Apple Watch Inventory Theories, Playing the Innovation Game
10:50 AM
Apple Uses Earth Day to Highlight China Solar Farm, More
9:51 AM
Analyst: Apple Watch Pre-orders are Build to Order
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!