The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Podcast - Apple Weekly Report #125: iPhone Expansion, NBC and Zune, Apple's Eco-stance

News Publishers Urge Reversal in Apple Source Case

by , 7:00 AM EDT, April 11th, 2005

A coalition of news publishers and two Internet industry trade associations filed friend-of-the-court briefs late last week urging the California Court of Appeal to protect the confidential sources of journalists and defend e-mail privacy in a lawsuit brought by Apple Computer against the Mac news sites O'Grady's PowerPage and AppleInsider.

In the brief that was prepared by Grant Penrod of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the news publishers argued that the trial court incorrectly allowed trade secret law to trump First Amendment rights, and that Apple has failed to exhaust all other alternative sources for the information it seeks before going after journalists' sources, as required by the reporter's privilege under the First Amendment.

On March 11, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg ruled Jason O'Grady of O'Grady's PowerPage must divulge confidential sources saying Apple's interests in protecting its trade secrets outweighed the public interest in the information.

Signers of the brief included the Associated Press, the California First Amendment Coalition, the California Newspaper Publishers Association, Copley Press, Freedom Communications, Inc., Hearst Corp., Los Angeles Times, McClatchy Company, San Jose Mercury News, Society of Professional Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and the Student Press Law Center.

The US Internet Industry Association and NetCoalition, which represent Internet companies including Internet service providers, search engines, portals, and hosting services, also filed a friend-of-the-court brief. The trade associations argued that the journalist's e-mail messages are protected under the federal Stored Communications Act. They further contend that if the trial court decision is not reversed, it will place an undue burden on service providers and will severely compromise email users' privacy.

On December 13, Apple filed suit against "Does 1-20" in a Santa Clara County district court. The company obtained a court order that allowed it to issue subpoenas to AppleInsider and PowerPage for the names of the "Does" who allegedly leaked the information in question. Journalists from PowerPage and AppleInsider had previously refused to release any information pertaining to the identities of their sources, citing first amendment protections and California's "shield" law, designed to protect journalists and encourage the publication of information in the public's interest.

Also named in the complaint was Mac site Think Secret. Although Apple first alleged Think Secret possessed trade secrets, it later admitted the site only linked to messages boards discussing the rumors of such a product and that those message boards were not owned by Think Secret.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1937 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: News Publishers Urge Reversal in Apple Source Case

Forget the news about the news publishers. This is what I found interesting:

Quote
article wrote:
Although Apple first alleged Think Secret possessed trade secrets, it later admitted the site only linked to messages boards discussing the rumors of such a product and that those message boards were not owned by Think Secret.


Did I miss this earlier? I hadn't heard about it. I'd assume it would be big news around here so I'm wondering if this is new. It's certainly the most interesting thing here if it is new news.

Close Name:Biff Posts: 1479 Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Subject:

email privacy?

View Name:Guest
Subject: Who's a journalist??
Close Name:Tiger Posts: 910 Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Subject: it's not about who's a journalist

It's about who's in possession of stolen information that, at it's most base level, isn't concerned with public safety or health issues.

The judge got it right by NOT answering the issue of whether the sites were protected as journalists. It's about whether they're trafficing in stolen information, i.e. intellectual property.

And this is the proper procedure to follow. It's called due process. And just like the defendants are entitled to it, so are the plaintiffs. It's not always a pleasant process, but it's the one we have.

Close Name:mozart11 Posts: 12 Joined: 21 Jun 2001
Subject: Where is everyone else?

It floors me that in this day where every main stream media is present on the web, from The New York Times to The National Review, why none to these highbrow elites have filed at least friend of the court briefs? Or financially support those fighting for the freedom of the press.

They will come after you next main stream media.

View Name:Guest
Subject: Kleinberg's best quote
View Name:Guest
Subject:
Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Friday, May 16th, 2008

Fri., 4:15 PM
TMO's DealsOnTheWeb.com - 8GB iPod Touch: $229 Delivered
3:35 PM
Safari Suffers from "Carpet Bomb" Issue
2:55 PM
iPodObserver - Barack Obama's Smartphone of Choice
2:35 PM
Parallels Releases Update for Vista SP1 and XP SP3
1:00 PM
iPodObserver - AT&T: Back to Three iPhone Limit Per Customer
12:55 PM
Mac Gaming News - Macgamestore Intros Agatha Christie: Peril at End House
10:35 AM
Hot Forum Topic - The iPhone's Growing Global Reach
10:05 AM
Unparsed - I found Those Missing iPhones!
9:45 AM
Fone2Phone 2.01 Improves Performance, Cell Phone Support
9:20 AM
Apple Scores 2 Black Pencils at D&AD Awards
8:40 AM
Yahoo to Icahn: Get a Clue
8:05 AM
iPodObserver - Orange Gets Europe, Middle East, Africa iPhone Deal
7:30 AM
TMO Quick Tip - Quick Look: Web Archives
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $187.6201. Change Today: -2.1099.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Apple iTunes

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb