The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
AMD Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel (UPDATED)

AMD Files Antitrust Suit Against Intel (UPDATED)

by , 3:25 PM EDT, June 28th, 2005

AMD on Tuesday announced that it has filed an antitrust complaint against Intel in U.S. federal district court in Delaware accusing the chip maker of unfair trade practices.

The company cited violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act and the California Business and Professions Code. AMD said in a statement that its 48-page complaint details "how Intel has unlawfully maintained its monopoly in the x86 microprocessor market by engaging in worldwide coercion of customers from dealing with AMD."

AMD said that Intel's share of the x86 processor market is 80% by unit volume and 90% by revenue, "giving it entrenched monopoly ownership and super-dominant market power." The chip supplier noted that Japan's Fair Trade Commission recently found that Intel abused its monopoly power, something "Intel did not contest," according to AMD, which said that the European Commission is pursuing similar possible violations.

In its press release, AMD cited a long list of violations, including: "Forcing major customers such as Dell, Sony, Toshiba, Gateway, and Hitachi into Intel-exclusive deals in return for outright cash payments, discriminatory pricing or marketing subsidies conditioned on the exclusion of AMD;" and "Establishing and enforcing quotas among key retailers such as Best Buy and Circuit City, effectively requiring them to stock overwhelmingly or exclusively, Intel computers, artificially limiting consumer choice."

AMD said that, for example, "Intel paid Sony millions for exclusivity," with its share of Sony's business dropping from 23% in 2002 to 8% in 2003 to zero percent today. The company also detailed aggressive action against Hewlett-Packard, Compaq, Gateway, Acer and other computer manufacturers, action that it said forced them to severely decrease the amount of business they give to AMD. The company also claimed that "Intel designed its compilers, which translate software programs into machine-readable language, to degrade a program's performance if operated on a computer powered by an AMD microprocessor."

Apple will be switching its computers to Intel processors in a year and complete the transition by the end of 2007, but the company was not mentioned, except in passing in AMD's press release.

UPDATE, 5:35 PM EST: After The Mac Observer posted this article, an Intel spokesperson responded to a request for comment by saying: "We strongly disagree with AMD's complaints about the business practices of Intel and Intel's customers. Intel believes in competing fairly and believes consumers are benefiting from this vigorous competition. AMD has chosen, once again, to complain to a court about Intel's success, with a legal case full of excuses and speculation. Intel will respond appropriately to AMD's latest complaints and is committed to successfully resolving these issues in court."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Guest
Subject: How will Apple benefit?

Must the US rely on Japan and EU to enforce antitrust laws? Will Apple's income expectations be affected? Will this maybe leave the door open to use AMD and IBM chipsets into the future?

Close Name:Benton Posts: 62 Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Subject: Forgot to log in.

Quote
Guest wrote:
Must the US rely on Japan and EU to enforce antitrust laws? Will Apple's income expectations be affected? Will this maybe leave the door open to use AMD and IBM chipsets into the future?


MACINTOSH today, MACINTOSH tomorrow and MACINTOSH forever!

Close Name:Guest
Subject: AMERIKKA FOR $ALE

Who ever buys the most laws and lawyers (US politicians) wins.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Headline Error

AMD has filed a Complaint to the US Federal Court system. This is not a Law Suit as your headline suggests. This is why Macs and their users suck :p

Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1960 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: Headline Error

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
AMD has filed a Complaint to the US Federal Court system. This is not a Law Suit as your headline suggests. This is why Macs and their users suck :p


It says "Antitrust Suit." That may "suggets" lawsuit to you but what is actually SAYS is "Antitrust Suit."

A "suit" literally means "a proceeding in a court of law" which is what this looks like to me.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Bill Gates

Stil blinging

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Oh well

maybe AMD should design a better chip

Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1960 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject:

I wish them well. It would be nice to see a mix of Intel and AMD chips in Apple or Dell products.

Right now companies usually offer more than one brand of video cards in their machines. This results in each company constantly trying to out-do the other so that more people pick their card when configuring a machine.

There's obviously competition between chip-makers, but imagine how fierce it would get if the average consumer could decide which brand they wanted in any computer they purchased.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Intel a Monopoly?

Intel doesn't dominate the x86 market; I do! Intel is the devil!

Close Name:Guest
Subject: AMD chips

Quote
Guest wrote:
maybe AMD should design a better chip


On the comparison of price/performance/power for simialr AMD and Intel chips, AMD wins hands down. But thats just one man's opinion... For a price compairson between AMD and Intel (end-user applications such as a custom build) AMD wins hands down again. But thats just the facts....

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Thank you, Small White Car. Some people have too much time on their hands.

Close Name:Al Swearengen Posts: 339 Joined: 10 May 2005
Subject: We are not different

Quote
Guest wrote:
Who ever buys the most laws and lawyers (US politicians) wins.


That happens in every country

Close Name:Guest
Subject: quoted for great truth

Quote
Al Swearengen wrote:


That happens in every country
[/quote]

Close Name:aleks Posts: 21 Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Subject: Funny

We , no well you all use to smash and beat intel to the ground, now...well, you have no choice but to defend them. Wow.........by the way, I said it before and I'll say it again, I love Apple, but I don't quite know what to think of the Zealots.......Also, I am no troll!!!!!!!!!!!!! #%$* RC!!!!!!!!

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: Funny

Quote
aleks wrote:
We , no well you all use to smash and beat intel to the ground, now...well, you have no choice but to defend them. Wow.........by the way, I said it before and I'll say it again, I love Apple, but I don't quite know what to think of the Zealots.......Also, I am no troll!!!!!!!!!!!!! #%$* RC!!!!!!!!


Not sure I see anybody on this thread defending Intel. Only pointing out that a suit is just a filing in court.

Personally I don't care what chip is creating heat in the background, only the quality of the OS that it is running. If OSX runs great on Intel-based hardware (or AMD-based) then that is wonderful. It is a "don't care" for me.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
Intruder wrote:
Personally I don't care what chip is creating heat in the background, only the quality of the OS that it is running. If OSX runs great on Intel-based hardware (or AMD-based) then that is wonderful. It is a "don't care" for me.


Absolutely! I'm a driver not a mechanic when it comes to OS'es.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Uh, that's Steve, not Intel

As one of the zealots, I think I defend what Steve Jobs says more than specific, non-Apple companies. Steve said before that the G4 was better than the Pentium, and so it was. Then he said the G5 was better. Sure. Now he says it doesn't matter what chip Apple uses, it's the OS experience that matters. And so it is.

I can't really think of much that Apple could do that I wouldn't adjust to in a week or so. I'm sold on Apple, and Apple at the moment is (and probably always has been) Steve Jobs.

Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2088 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: antitrust

[quote="Guest"]Must the US rely on Japan and EU to enforce antitrust laws?/quote]

Given the attitude of the current administration, it's unlikely that the federal government will support, much less attack, such an antitrust suit. Almost as soon as Ashcroft became AG, he told the US attorneys handling the Microsoft suit to go for a lower settlement, which got so watered down that the judge would have rejected it, if possible. The fact that Microsoft gave oodles of money to the Bush campaign didn't have anything to do with this, of course.

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: antitrust

[quote="gslusher"]

Quote
Guest wrote:
Must the US rely on Japan and EU to enforce antitrust laws?/quote]

Given the attitude of the current administration, it's unlikely that the federal government will support, much less attack, such an antitrust suit. Almost as soon as Ashcroft became AG, he told the US attorneys handling the Microsoft suit to go for a lower settlement, which got so watered down that the judge would have rejected it, if possible. The fact that Microsoft gave oodles of money to the Bush campaign didn't have anything to do with this, of course.


Most likely not, since Microsoft gave oodles of money to both the Bush and Kerry campaigns. In fact, the majority of Microsoft PAC money went to Democrats, not Republicans.

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117487,00.asp

Campaign contributions are a matter of public record. Don't assume that the outcome was "bought".

Close Name:Guest
Subject: AMD vs Intel, and apple

So why did Apple decide to use intel chips and not AMD, I believe AMD would be much more suitable for the Macintosh.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated November 22nd

Fri, 7:07 PM
Games - Soccer Sim Championship Manager 2010 Released for Mac
6:47 PM
Games - EA Publishes Original Monopoly for iPhone
6:15 PM
News - Original Apple I on Ebay for $50K, w/Letter from Steve Jobs
6:11 PM
Games - New iPhone Games: Secret of the Lost Cavern Ep 1, New DJ Nights, More
5:47 PM
Games - Star Trek D-A-C Game Headed to the Mac Next Month
4:57 PM
Product News - TidBITS Releases “Take Control of Syncing Data in Snow Leopard”
4:26 PM
John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 11/20) Stationery Pads Go Poof
2:59 PM
Free on iTunes - Musée du Louvre, Art Lite, SketchBook Mobile X and More.
1:50 PM
Deal Brothers - Acer P215H bmid 21.5” Widescreen LCD Monitor:  $139.99
11:24 AM
TMO Appearances - Jeff Gamet Shares More Holiday Gift Ideas on MacJury
10:43 AM
Product News - Cocktail 4.5 for Leopard Adds QuickLook Cache Clearing
10:06 AM
News - Hack Enables Mac OS X 10.6.2 on Netbooks

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!