God this is so lame. I can't (well I CAN... ) believe that the airport is trying to pull this kind of stuff. Such a stupid and unreasonable suit to get into over what can only be a little bit of money. If the airport has wi-fi, and continental has wi-fi, then it would be pretty safe to say that continental's is not interfering with the Airport's security. What a crock. This is all about money, and it's disgusting that they're trying to use such BS to strong arm Continental.

I basically dislike air carriers (well the ones that don't make money and ask for Federal breaks) but I dislike using BS technology arguments to get your way even more.

I LOVE COMCAST!

As a Boston resident I'm embarrassed that Logan charges for wireless access. I've experienced free wireless access in a variety of airports across the country--Massport, change the policy!

I know Portland Oregon is free, but I have never seen it free at any other airport I've been at. (probably about 25 airports this year) Boston is obviously trying to rape Continental in this incident.

Hence the term "Massholes".

Sincerely,
Bitter Colts Fan

I'm pretty sure the Columbus, OH airport (CMH) has free wi-fi throughout.

DarelRex@gmail.com

Colorado Springs, CO (COS) has free Wifi.

Even the little tiny airport in Erie PA has free wifi, courtesy of the airport..

What if the airlines offered "Free Drinks" to their frequent fliers in their lounges? Would that interfere with their concession business? Wouldn't they shut that down too? Dopes.

Isn't all wifi free? or do you guys just not have the skills?

Just kidding, I'd NEVER do that.

I came across free WiFi at Bradley here in little ol' Connecticut.

I don't quite understand the argument. What risks is Massport talking about?
Continental offers WiFi in its lounge. Massport offers WiFi in the airport. Yet only Continental's poses a risk? Wouldn't they both pose the same risks, if any?

All you need to know is that it involves Massport. Basically a company that was created to manage all of the transportation access crap (airports, bridges, ports) in boston and they have a monopoly given to them by the government-this has nothing to do with security. Only that Massport has taken a beating since 9/11 and is looking for any way to make money. This is one of the most corrupt organizations in boston. They have a very union way of thinking-let's not compete fairly but find a way to screw our customers until they leave the airport and then whine about it.

It is likely that Logan Airport has a contract with a local company to provide, "exculsive" Wi Fi service at the airport, and the Continental service violates the, "exclusive" part of the contract. It is also likely that Logan airport will get a cut of the proceeds from the service.

If Continental is allowed to maintain its service, then what happens when Starbucks, Borders and any other company that has a Wi Fi service starts broadcasting? The local companys', "excusive" contract is worthless, the airport doesn't get its cut, and the Airport Authority can be held liable for its inability to assure that this local company is the only Wi Fi provider in airport.

The situation is pathetic; Logan is more interested in the incremental revenue from sale of the exculsive service then they are interesting in keeping the flying public happy. After all, what other airport is there for Continental to move to? Massport should be ashamed of themselves.