The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Podcast - Mac Geek Gab #172: Maintenance Utilities, Wiring For Broadband, System Preferences Issues and Cool Stuff Found

TMO Reports - Creative Accuses Apple of Violating its Patent

by , 1:30 PM EDT, September 1st, 2005

Creative Technology, which on Tuesday announced that it has won what it calls the "Zen Patent" covering the interface for its MP3 players, is "looking at all [its] alternatives right now," according to president Craig McHugh.

According to a New York Times article, Mr. McHugh noted: "We have always been very vigorous in our defense of our patent portfolio." Reporter Laurie J. Flynn noted that Mr. McHugh "said on Wednesday that Apple was the only company that Creative had identified so far that was in violation of the patent, although Creative was investigating others."

Creative said that its defense could include legal action. Apple declined to comment.

Ms. Flynn quoted intellectual property (IP) lawyer Mark Goldstein as saying that Creative is "trying to show they're in the same league" as Apple by going after what he called "the 500-pound gorilla" in the marketplace. Creative holds about 3.3% of the MP3 player market while Apple controls approximately 74%.

However, Tom Field, a professor at Franklin Pierce Law Center who specializes in IP issues, told The Mac Observer that companies don't typically defend their patents by going after the top dog first. "They go after the small potatoes who can't afford to defend themselves, collect license fees from them and then build a war chest for going after the big company," he explained.

He added: "That also makes the patent look better because they can show all these other companies that have agreed to pay license fees."

Mr. Field said that if Apple is found in violation of Creative's patent, it would be forced to pay royalties on the sale of all iPods going back to the date of the Zen Patent's publication, which was Jan. 5, 2001. That would cover all iPods sold since its introduction in October 2001.

Going forward, Apple would have to obtain a license from Creative to keep including that interface on the iPod, which Mr. Field said seemed unlikely "given the bad blood between the two companies." Creative could refuse to sell a license to Apple, if it wants.

Of course, Apple has other alternatives before it has to resort to paying for licenses, altering the iPod's interface or even discontinuing sales of the MP3 player. Mr. Goldstein pointed out to Ms. Flynn that Apple could request that the U.S. Patent Office re-examine Creative's patent. However, to fight Creative in court, Apple would have to show that it had similar technology in existence before Creative started shipping its MP3 players in September 2000.

"What would matter then is what was out there in, say, 1999 and 2000," Mr. Goldstein said. "What anybody was doing similar to Creative could be a huge burden to overcome."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
View Name:Guest
Subject: The old adage holds true....
View Name:Guest
Subject: I agree
View Name:Guest
Subject:
Close Name:coaten Posts: 3024 Joined: 10 Oct 2001
Subject:

It's just plain sad. There is no honour in a fight of this nature.

View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject: Probably does not apply...
View Name:Guest
Subject: Will they sue ...
View Name:Guest
Subject: Creative Can Suck It...
View Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Creative Can Suck It...
View Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Creative Can Suck It...
View Name:Guest
Subject: Creative's A Total Joke
View Name:Guest
Subject: Re: Creative's A Total Joke
View Name:Guest
Subject: You guys are idiots
View Name:Guest
Subject:
Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3079 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject:

If you bother to read the posts around here, you'd notice that most think patents on this sort of thing are stupid regardless of who files for it. The Patent Office seems to hand them out for the most ridiculous claims.

But, since you decided to throw in the "fanboy" insults, you probably just want to stir the pot. Or are you just incapable of making a reasoned statement without insulting your audience?

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Wed., 4:35 PM
Joost Announces Flash Viewer, Adds Social Networking Features
4:05 PM
TMO Reports - Apple's Pricing Strategy Different Than the Street
1:50 PM
How to Keep Leopard Purring
12:35 PM
Microsoft Exec Says Mac Users Pay an "Apple Tax"
12:05 PM
OWC Announces Memory Upgrade Kits for New MacBooks
9:40 AM
Forum Poll: Are You Buying a New MacBook or MacBook Pro?
9:15 AM
TextSoap 6 Improves Cleaner Editor
8:40 AM
Analyst: $999 MacBook Big News
8:20 AM
Typinator 3.2 Adds FileMaker Snippets
7:55 AM
Apple Posts MacBook, Display Event Video
7:30 AM
Flash Player 10 Sports 3D, GPU Acceleration Support
12:10 AM
Adobe Ships Creative Suite 4 Apps
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Macworld Expo - Hotel Deal
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $97.95. Change Today: -6.13.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb