The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
What Lies Behind the Apple-Creative Settlement?

TMO Reports - What Lies Behind the Apple-Creative Settlement?

by , 5:35 PM EDT, August 24th, 2006

With Apple and Creative settling their legal dispute, questions remain about the settlement terms. Apple is paying US$100 million to Creative for the use of its patented MP3 player navigation technology, but it could recoup much of that money if Creative can obtain licensing fees from other companies, a curious arrangement for such a situation.

Meanwhile, Creative will produce iPod accessories, but it didn't say if it will also stop making its own MP3 players; iPodObserver.com had a request in for comment from the company as this article was posted.

"This settlement suggests that Apple thought they could lose the case," noted law professor Lars Smith, who teaches at the University of Louisville's Louis D. Brandeis School of Law. "This was more than a nuisance payment, and the legal fees if they had pursued this in court would have been a lot less than $100 million."

He added: "That's not to suggest Apple did anything wrong, however. Patent filings are kept secret for 18 months after they're filed, so both companies could have been working on the same thing at the same time, but Creative beat Apple to the filing."

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster pointed out in a research report he issued on Thursday: "If Creative had been able to win any favorable rulings in the five outstanding lawsuits, Apple could have faced headaches including: further appeals, product injunctions, future and historical royalty payments, etc."

Not only that, said Mr. Smith, but "Apple, as the biggest player in the market, could have anti-trust issues. If they had an exclusive license for Creative's patent, they could have been challenged in court."

The professor also pointed to Microsoft's impending entry in the market, the Zune MP3 player. "Apple could be worried about that," he said. "And Creative can't compete against Microsoft too." He agreed that, if Microsoft has to license Creative's technology for Zune, Apple could reap the benefit by seeing some of its $100 million payment come back via one of its staunchest rivals.

Addressing Creative's announcement that it will produce iPod accessories through the "Made For iPod" program, Mr. Munster said: "We see it as a turning point in Creative's thinking on the space. Over the last several years, Creative has been focused on head-to-head competition with the iPod and it appears that the company is now embracing the iPod ecosystem as a way to grow revenue. We see this as a subtle admission by Creative that iPod does in fact dominate the MP3 player market (~75% U.S. market share according to NPD) and more may be gained from "coopetition" than direct competition."

Recent Headlines - Updated November 28th

Thu,8:00 AM
Happy Thanksgiving from The Mac Observer!
Wed,9:36 PM
Apple Reportedly Building Chinese Sapphire Plant with Foxconn
8:40 PM
ACM 282: The Steampunk, Sapphire, and Apple Watch Episode
7:46 PM
Melissa Holt on MacJury’s Holiday Gift Guide 2
4:42 PM
Steampunk USB Flash Drives with Motorized Gears - Really!
4:05 PM
Black Friday 2014: The Best Mac Deals
3:10 PM
iOS 8: Control Which Apps Can Access Your Private Data
2:50 PM
The Name Your Own Price Must-Have Mac Bundle
1:36 PM
TMO Daily Observations: 2014-11-26
10:46 AM
5 iPhone Apps to Cut Your Thanksgivings Stress
8:50 AM
iOS 8 and OS X Yosemite: Naming Group Conversations in Messages
Tue,9:01 PM
BuzzFeed Uses Apple Watches to Incentivise Staff
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!