The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Running Vista in Parallels - The Big Gotcha

Running Vista in Parallels - The Big Gotcha

by , 12:55 PM EST, January 31st, 2007

Parallels is alerting its customers that, with the introduction of Vista, Microsoft has complicated things substantially in the Vista End User License Agreement (EULA) regarding the virtualization environment. In a communication with TMO on Wednesday, Ben Rudolph, the Parallels Marketing Manager pointed out that Microsoft has set some "very specific, and restrictive, guidelines on when and how Vista can be run in a virtual machine."

Parallels Desktop is the #2 selling software for Macs (behind Microsoft Office). It allows Macintosh users to run Mac OS X and Windows side-by-side using virtualization technology.

The crux of the matter is that the least expensive versions of Vista, the Home Basic and Home Premium are not licensed for use in a virtualization environment. This will force customers who want to run Vista within Parallels into, at least, the Business version of Vista which retails for $299.

It gets worse. The Vista EULA goes on to say:

"USE WITH VIRTUALIZATION TECHNOLOGIES. You may use the software installed on the licensed device within a virtual (or otherwise emulated) hardware system on the licensed device. If you do so, you may not play or access content or use applications protected by any Microsoft digital, information or enterprise rights management technology or other Microsoft rights management services or use BitLocker. We advise against playing or accessing content or using applications protected by other digital, information or enterprise rights management technology or other rights management services or using full volume disk drive encryption."

This would appear to preclude the use of Vista for things like watching DRM'd video content including the new Netflix service. But the dust has not settled and the complete EULA interpretation will become clearer in time.

Parallels has posted additional coverage on the issue at their Website.

In a related story at OSNews on Tuesday, it was pointed out that when customers upgrade from XP to Vista, their XP license is voided. Those who looked at the EULA concluded, "What this means, basically, is that after you've upgraded your XP install to Vista, you cannot use the license of your old XP install on another computer."

One way to deal with the first issue above is to utilize Apple's Boot Camp and bypass the restrictions in the Vista EULA regarding virtualization. But many customers who are enthusiastic about running Mac OS X and Vista apps side-by-side, especially with the Parallels "Coherence" feature won't like that alternative.

Digg!

Recent Headlines - Updated April 18th

Fri, 7:25 PM
Look Out Apple Haters, Android’s Monopoly on Large Screens Will End
5:20 PM
Why Apple Didn’t Try to Copy Google Glass
4:30 PM
Menu Bars Of The Stars
4:12 PM
How to Streamline System Preferences on Your Mac
2:56 PM
Microsoft Pilot Program Allows Developers to Respond to App Reviews
1:15 PM
Tavik’s Zippered Folio Case for iPad Air is Built for Travel
1:13 PM
Apple Maps Misses Your Coffee Shop, but Finds Loch Ness Monster
12:55 PM
Online Privacy: Track Which Apps Access Your Personal Information
10:56 AM
Judge Denies Rockstar Consortium’s Bid to Move Google Patent Fight to Troll Town
9:25 AM
Dropbox gets Deeper into Photo Management with Loom Purchase
8:40 AM
iTunes Radio: Create a Station from a Song or Artist
Thu, 7:56 PM
Apple’s First WSJ Mention: Just Three Words in 1978
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!