The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Podcast - Apple Weekly Report #125: iPhone Expansion, NBC and Zune, Apple's Eco-stance

Heinen, Anderson Likely Targets for SEC Charges

by , 11:45 AM EDT, April 23rd, 2007

Apple's former General Counsel Nancy Heinen and former CFO Fred Anderson are the most likely targets for criminal charges in the SEC backdating probe into the Mac and iPod maker's stock option grants. Criminal charges could be filed against the former Apple executives as early as this week, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

Ms. Heinen was investigated for her alleged role in orchestrating stock option grants that were backdated to favorable dates for the recipients, and for approving falsified documents related to option grants . She may also have benefited from backdated grants herself.

Miles Ehrlich, Ms.Heinen's lawyer, said that she is being used as a scapegoat because Apple is a high profile company. "It's simply unfair to single out Nancy Heinen for enforcement action from among the thousands of executives in hundreds of companies all over this country who've been swept up in these stock options cases," he said.

Unnamed sources close to the investigation also claimed that former CFO Fred Anderson may be targeted with criminal charges. His legal team was not available for comment, and the SEC has not confirmed or denied the claim.

Apple launched its own independent investigation into possible backdated option grant irregularities last year. In June 2006, the company announced that it had found evidence of improperly backdated grants, and then turned the information over to the SEC. The investigation raised concerns about the involvement of former Apple executives, presumably Ms. Heinen and Mr. Anderson, but cleared CEO Steve Jobs.

The SEC conducted its own investigation, and later the U.S Attorney's office launched a criminal investigation as well. That investigation seemed to be focused on former Apple attorney Wendy Howell and her involvement in an option grant awarded to Mr. Jobs. Ms. Howell claimed that she was working under instructions from Ms. Heinen.

Should Ms. Heinen's legal team state that they will fight any charges brought against her. Mr. Ehrlich commented "Nancy didn't backdate stock options, and she didn't deceive anyone."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Bosco Posts: 971 Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Subject: Criminal charges

Criminal charges could be filed against the former Apple executives as early as this week...

It's unlikely they could be filed any earlier at this point.

Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2003 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Maybe

Quote
Bosco wrote:
Criminal charges could be filed against the former Apple executives as early as this week...

It's unlikely they could be filed any earlier at this point.


Dunno, perhaps they could be backdated?

Close Name:Bosco Posts: 971 Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Subject: Re: Maybe

Quote
gslusher wrote:
Dunno, perhaps they could be backdated?


Good one!!

Close Name:JonGl Posts: 93 Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Subject: I'm not sure I understand....

Was backdating "illegal" when this was done? It seems to me, that if this was such a common practice, that there's something fishy about prosecuting it. I know tax laws are often created such that they reach into the past, and tax income/items from before the tax law was in place, but prosecuting crimes that weren't crimes when they were committed sounds like a farce, and I thought that was what was happening here... Can somebody clarify?

-Jon

Close Name:Bosco Posts: 971 Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Subject: Re: I'm not sure I understand....

Jon, Backdating per se is not illegal now nor was it illegal in the past. What is illegal is not accounting for the shares according to Generally Accepted Accounting Standards (GAAP). Currently, GAAP does not require options to be expensed, but this options scandal is likely to change GAAP toward that.

What Uncle Fred is accused of here with regard to an options grant given to Steve Jobs apparently is picking a date when AAPL was at a short/medium term low and granting Jobs' stock options at that price. This lets Jobs maximize profit when he exercises the options in the future. The accounting problem is that Apple actually has to acquire this stock into its option pool in order to grant it to Jobs later. So if Apple acquires it on Day D at $X/share, but Apple backdates the option to day D-100 at $X-15/share, then Apple is giving Jobs $15/share but not accounting for that gift.

People are pissed off and the regulators are on companies' backs because this was a widespread management abuse of trust. It is mostly a senior management issue. CEO pay is under scrutiny from all sorts of people, not just left wing nuts. Read John C. Bogle's books. He founded the Vanguard funds, which were the first index mutual funds.

Close Name:JonGl Posts: 93 Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Subject: Re: I'm not sure I understand....

Quote
Bosco wrote:
Jon, Backdating per se is not illegal now nor was it illegal in the past. What is illegal is not accounting for the shares according to Generally Accepted Accounting Standards (GAAP). Currently, GAAP does not require options to be expensed, but this options scandal is likely to change GAAP toward that.


Thanks for that succinct information.

-Jon

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Thursday, May 15th, 2008

Thu., 4:50 PM
OWC Adds Sizes, Reduces Prices for Portable Hard Drive Line
4:20 PM
Battlestations: Midway Set for June 27 Release
3:40 PM
ForeSee Survey: Apple, Newegg and H-P Lead in Online Satisfaction
1:30 PM
Apple's Bolyston Street Store Sign of Things to Come
1:05 PM
TMO Appearances - TMO's Dave Hamilton, John F. Braun at NCMUG
12:30 PM
Mozilla Releases Thunderbird 3 Alpha
12:10 PM
Marware Introduces C.E.O. Envi for MacBook Air
11:25 AM
Icahn Ready to Dump Yahoo Board
10:40 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Time Capsule: Reader Experiences
10:15 AM
Take Control Unveils New Apple Mail Books
9:50 AM
iPodObserver - Intel Debunks iPhone Atom Rumors
9:20 AM
iPodObserver - AT&T: One iPhone Per Customer
8:50 AM
Skype 2.7 Hotfix Improves Firewall, Router Support
8:05 AM
Cyberduck 3 Adds WebDAV, Amazon S3 Support
5:00 AM
Adobe Intros Flash Player 10 Beta
3:40 AM
User Friendly Blog by Ted Landau - The iPhone needs a faster better Safari
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $189.73. Change Today: +3.47.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb