The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple Board Responds to ex-CFO Claims

Apple Board Responds to ex-CFO Claims

by , 4:35 PM EDT, April 25th, 2007

In an uncharacteristic move, Apple Inc's Board of Directors responded to the accusations from former CFO Fred Anderson that Steve Jobs was aware of the implications of improperly backdating stock option grants. The board said in a statement that Apple will not enter into a debate with Mr. Anderson or his attorneys over Mr. Jobs's involvement in the backdating issue.

The statement from board members Bill Campbell, Millard Drexler, Albert Gore Jr., Arthur D. Levinson, Eric Schmidt and Jerry York stated in part "Steve Jobs cooperated fully with Apple's independent investigation and with the government's investigation of stock option grants at Apple. The SEC investigated the matter thoroughly and its complaint speaks for itself, in terms of what it says, what it does not say, who it charges, and who it does not charge."

In essence, the Apple Board responded to Mr. Anderson's allegations to state that it would not respond.

After agreeing to a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday, Mr. Anderson released a statement through his lawyer claiming that he advised Mr. Jobs of the accounting implications when backdating stock option grants - Implying that Mr. Jobs was directly involved in improper stock option grant backdating and was aware of the possible consequences.

The board also stated "We have complete confidence in the conclusions of Apple's independent investigation, and in Steve's integrity and his ability to lead Apple."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Rainy Day Posts: 607 Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Subject: Pretty quick “non-response”

The Board was quick to “not-respond” to Fred. Guess they wanted to nip in the bud any speculation that Steve might be asked to resign as a result of Fred’s assertions, and that they wanted to send a clear message that Steve has their full support.

Be all that as it may, i read Fred’s statement as CYA spin-doctoring, nothing more. I’m sure he’s already told the SEC as much as what was in his statement.

But there are many alarmists out there who would love to make this into something more than it is, in order to garner a little attention for themselves, or simply because they’re paranoid. The Board is simply trying to head the FUDmeisters off at the pass.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated July 9th

Thu, 3:50 PM
Ted Landau's User Friendly Blog - User Interface Blues
3:42 PM
Reports - Chrome OS Complicates Apple & Google Boards of Directors
1:08 PM
Deal Brothers - Life ‘09 Software Drops to $59.99 Delivered
11:06 AM
News - TechRestore Posts Stop-motion iPhone 3GS Breakdown
10:17 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Parallels versus Fusion: Reader Favorites
9:32 AM
Product News - LaCie Unveils LaCinema Rugged HD Multimedia Hard Drive
8:54 AM
Product News - CheckUp 2.5 Adds Snow Leopard, New Mac Support
8:37 AM
News - Latest Microsoft Ad Hits at MacBook Price Again
8:06 AM
TMO Appearances - TMO’s Jeff Gamet Dives into Social Media at CoMUG
7:30 AM
The Back Page - Looking Ahead at the App Store’s Future
Wed, 6:48 PM
Games - Pipe Mania Puzzle Game Released for Mac, iPhone
5:36 PM
Product News - Apple Releases Safari 4.0.2 with Nitro JavaScript Engine Improvements

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!