The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Editorial - Dvorak Has Right Idea, Wrong Platform

Chip Makers Add Cores, but Software Isn't Keeping Up

by , 2:30 PM EDT, July 23rd, 2007

Chip makers are racing to add cores to their microprocessors, and they create some buzz with the technology. Software developers, however, are being hard pressed to exploit these multi-core CPUs, and if they don't learn how to do it routinely, fast, and soon, there could be trouble in the industry, according to Jordan Robertson of the Associated Press on Sunday.

Multi-core processors are designed to avoid problems that plagued high clock rate processors that leaked energy and ran hot. Multi-core processors can run a little slower and get more work done in each unit of time -- assuming that the software can parcel out work, called a thread, effectively to each core.

The problem, according to Mr. Robertson, is that advanced multi-core designs are outpacing the ability of software developers to exploit them.

"You can imagine a scenario where people stop buying laptops and PCs because we can't figure this out," said David Patterson, a computer-architecture expert and computer science professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

"The gap between hardware and software hasn't become a problem for consumers yet, because operating systems like Windows XP and Vista [and Mac OS X] already work with the multicore chips out now, and basic applications like word processing and e-mail won't need the extra cores or a software overhaul," the author wrote. "But experts predict dire consequences if the software for more complicated applications isn't brought up to speed soon."

The key is the scalability of the software. If it doesn't scale well with the number of cores, customers will start to become disenchanted. Eight core systems are already being planned. "We'd be in uncharted territory," Patterson said. "We need to get some Manhattan Projects going here — somebody could solve this problem, and whoever solves this problem could have this gigantic advantage on everybody else."

Part of the problem is our languages and part of it is programmer education. Mark Lewin, program manager in External Research & Programs for Microsoft Research, just announced a US$500,000 grant program for universities with innovative ideas on how to solve this problem for multi-core computing.

The technology also raises the question of, given the state-of-the-art, how many cores the average user can exploit given today's software. Or even advanced technical users.

"Companies that successfully migrate appropriate mass-market applications to the parallel computing environment — or create new ones that exploit the shift in chip technology — stand to profit mightily," the author concluded.

TMO notes that memory access is also an issue. Multi-core processors, especially when used for advanced, threaded scientific calculations, need fast access to memory. Desktop users, managing their e-mail and surfing, however may not need all that memory speed, so manufacturers try to manage production costs accordingly. That means engineering compromise. As a result, there is even more opportunity for customers in science and advanced technology to become jaded with their desktop systems because, even with efficient threads, they cannot move their data fast enough.

  

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2059 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Dire consequences?

"But experts predict dire consequences if the software for more complicated applications isn't brought up to speed soon."

What "dire consequences"?

"'You can imagine a scenario where people stop buying laptops and PCs because we can't figure this out,' said David Patterson, a computer-architecture expert and computer science professor at the University of California, Berkeley."

Yeah, sure. They'll stick with older, slower, less capable computers just to spite the manufacturers and software developers. Sure.

View Name:Guest
Subject: No Communication?
View Name:Guest
Subject: re: gslusher
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2059 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: re: gslusher

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Quote
gslusher wrote:
Yeah, sure. They'll stick with older, slower, less capable computers just to spite the manufacturers and software developers. Sure.


The point is that the new computers effectively *won't* be any faster or more capable if the software doesn't take advantage of the increased number of cores.


So people won't buy new computers at all? Realize that few people get every single uptick in computers. Most probably wait 2-3 years, by which time the newer computers are substantially faster and more capable than their old computers.

I still want to know what the "dire consequences" will be. Will Dell go bankrupt? Will Intel's stock drop to $0.03? Will HP lay off 10,000 people? Will China enter a depression when all PC and laptop manufacturing contracts are cancelled?

View Name:Guest
Subject:
Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

Tue., 5:00 PM
Corsaire Publishes Guide on Hardening OS X Leopard
3:30 PM
iPodObserver - Pacific Crest Sees Big Jump in iPhone Surfing, Rising Apple Cash Flow
3:00 PM
iPodObserver - Blog: Infineon Drivers May be Cause of iPhone 3G Dropped Calls
1:35 PM
Cooliris 1.8 Adds Safari 3.1 Support
1:15 PM
PCW: Intel, Dell Innovate for Mobile Users, Windows Sleeps
12:30 PM
Psystar Misses Another Deadline to Respond, Given Extension
12:00 PM
Dr. Mac: Rants & Raves - Episode #84: When Good iPhones Go Bad...
10:50 AM
Apple Intros New Get a Mac Ads
10:15 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Reader Perception: Apple's PR
9:40 AM
Apple Tops PCs in Customer Satisfaction Study
9:00 AM
Apple to Open Fort Worth Store on Aug 23
8:30 AM
Apple's $20 Billion Cash and a 21st Century Mission
7:50 AM
iPodObserver - Apple Tosses MobileMe Users 60 Day Credit
6:00 AM
iPO Review - DLO Portable Speakers for iPhone
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Special Report: WWDC 2008
  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!
  • New Media Expo 2008

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $173.53. Change Today: -1.86.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

What's the buzz? These articles have TMO readers talking.

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb