The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article:

Mossberg: iWork '08 Nice, Innovative, but Numbers Wimpy

by , 4:10 PM EDT, August 16th, 2007

Apple's new iWork '08 is a nice product, has some refreshing innovations, but Numbers is wimpy compared with Microsoft Excel, according to Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

Mr. Mossberg tested iWork '08 to see if Apple could really take on Microsoft in the category of productivity software -- where MS Office rules even on the Mac.

The verdict was: "iWork ‘08 is a nice product, capable of turning out sophisticated and attractive word-processing, presentation and spreadsheet documents. It can even read Microsoft Office documents, whether created on the Mac or on Windows computers, and can save documents in Microsoft Office formats so they can be opened in Office on the Mac or on Windows."

However, Mr. Mossberg concluded that iWork "Work simply isn't as powerful or versatile as Microsoft Office, especially when it comes to word processing and spreadsheets. And it suffers from a design that places far more emphasis on making documents look beautiful than on the nuts and bolts of the actual process of writing and number-crunching." [Emphasis added by TMO.]

Even though the Numbers application has some "refreshing innovation" is very approachable, has sliders for changing values, and has better sorting, it is missing some important features and is "wimpier than Excel," according to Mr. Mossberg. Numbers has about half the functions of Excel and has no pivot tables.

Pages was noted to be more of a page layout tool than a writing program, something that is well known. Finally, Keynote was lauded as the strongest part of the trio.

"If you’re a Mac user with basic word-processing and spreadsheet needs, and a strong emphasis on design, iWork is good choice, especially if perfect compatibility with Microsoft Office isn't a high priority. But for office-suite users more concerned with function than form, I’d recommend sticking with Office," Mr. Mossberg concluded.

TMO notes that the design of iWork is intentionally different than MS Office and caters to a different kind of customer. However, comparing the products is useful for those Apple customers who just don't want to (or can't) pay for both, need to learn more, and need to decide which one meets their needs better. In that sense, Mr. Mossberg's comparison was valuable and well executed.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:hardfaught Posts: 8 Joined: 06 May 2005
Subject: Excel Vs Numbers

As a civil engineer, I love Excel. It is amazingly powerful and it can do almost every thing possible in mathematics. But it has a steep learning curve for anything but the basics, and it is butt ugly unless you have the time to tweak it just right. I think there is a good size market for a elegant easy to use solution with some of the power of excel. This will not replace excel, but if it comes as advertised, I will likely use it a home over excel.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

I'm revolted by Pages and Numbers, and even Leopard! Apple's quality has steadily declined in the quality assurance and beta testing areas. Releases are becoming buggier and while needed features are being added, supreme sacrifices to UI design are being made. In so many instances, Apple is reinventing things when they need not to, and not even following the Apple HUman Interface Guidelines!

Close Name:Sir Harry Flashman Posts: 792 Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Subject: Email and URLs in a cell

One thing I have found with Numbers is that you can set the preferences so that you can edit a cell containing an email address or URL without it opening your mail client or browser. I know that there are tricks to do that in Excel, but it should be an option. Now I am using Excel from 2004 so maybe the later versions fixed that situation.

My spreadsheet needs are not too great, for the time being, so I may purchase iWork. Currently I am "trying" the trial version.

Close Name:usnddrp1 Posts: 4 Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Subject:

My wife and I are in the midst of publishing a book and have found Pages far better for editing and proofing. I have also switched from Excel to Numbers and, for my basic needs, have not run into any problems using my old Excel files.

One thing that's being overlooked in all this, IMHO, is: IWork is $79 and Office is $300+, unless you get the Student version which is still $150.

A significant difference for the average, basic user.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Both

I've found Numbers a little frustrating so far (i.e. cutting and pasting a set of columns with Formulae doesn't seem to move the references as well as Excel) but what does strike me immediately is that it's a perfect 'post-production' tool for Excel spreadsheets.

i.e. it's very rare you need to send a finished spreadsheet with all the Formulae, etc, intact for someone else to edit. It is just like Word, in that people send the editable file as the final version.

So I can see a workflow involving using Excel (and your Excel skills) to get the results you want, then pasting the actual cells into Numbers just to create a nice presentation version (esp. as printing is the worst part of Excel).

Close Name:geoduck Posts: 1922 Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Subject:

For right now I'll stick with my old MS OfficeX and even older FileMakerPro. But as soon as they add a simple database to iWork I'm there.

I'm not sure iWork is supposed to compete with MS Office. As others have pointed out it does basic functions well and costs less than a third of what Office costs. For those of us with simple needs it's perfect (as soon as they add a database that is).

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Brave Using Office X

Quote
geoduck wrote:
For right now I'll stick with my old MS OfficeX and even older FileMakerPro. But as soon as they add a simple database to iWork I'm there.


I used Office X for a long time but eventually found the lack of support for special characters and the number of crashes intolerable. Entourage was rendered unusable within weeks of loading it onto my PowerBook G4 and Word suffered quite a considerable number of crashes too. Office 2004 is much more stable (but not perfect) and restores my faith in the fact that Office deserves to be at the top spot. Having had a quick glance at the iWork trial, I can say that I agree it is not an Office replacement, more of a text editor upgrade, but then for the price what can you expect. My one hope was that Apple would have snuck in the ability to read .dot templates from Word and Visual Basic - but it looks like we are waiting on Open Office to be the real challenger.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Good enough

Since I am not a big Excel user, I may be just the person Apple is aiming at with Numbers. I bought the package mostly for the upgrade to Keynote, but have been waiting for an alternative to Excel. I have been using Numbers to manage some financial issues. It is elegant and a joy to use. I am sure that there is a lot that it can't do that Excel does, but it is unlikely that a user like myself will ever find those things. One particular thing that I appreciate is the way it handles formulas using referenced cells. If you are using whole columns of cells such as "cost" or "sales tax", it will use those terms in the formula so you can more easily see what you meant it to do. For single a formula, when you go back to look at it, you will see the referenced cells are highlighted in distinct colors. This has helped immeasurably when I have worked to figure out why a resulting number was not what I expected.
Beautiful program; great price.

Close Name:Fairly Posts: 25 Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Subject: Mosshead

I think Mosshead is missing the point. 25 years ago M$ promised Multiplan for Apple and where have Apple themselves been on the spreadsheet front since then? This is a watershed. And I am sorry but XL sucks like mad. Just see what fourmilab.ch said about it.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Numbers vs. Excel

Sometimes there are too many people playing the game of "in order for Apple to win, Microsoft has to lose", and it is clear that you don't have to play that game. I use a ibook G4 and plan on buying a Macbook this winter and what I have found that a lot of people always try to see which company out does each other. Now, I will say that I personally feel that Mac is by far the best computer that I have worked on. I enjoy working on OS X and I am using the free trial of iwork and plan on buying it as well. Many people will have different opinions as to which spreadsheet program they feel is better. I have a friend that uses Excel 2007 on his HP laptop and he feels that Numbers blows it out of the water. : ) Some people that have used Excel for years will probably feel refreshed about the look and feel of Numbers, and some die hard Windows users will down play it now matter how good it is just because it is an Apple product. In short, Apple does what they do best which is making great software that people enjoy using. Numbers to me is Awesome!

Close Name:Guest
Subject: iwork

Hello Im a student currently in my Freshman year at highschool. I am currently using a MacBook Pro and have found that whilst using iWork '08 the amount of crashes I endure with a single assignment are almost intolerable. If anyone is aware of this issue, and is willing to help me; please email me at aturner@turnerzworld.com or aturner@tpc-studios.com.
Thanks.
Alexander Turner

Close Name:LaurieF -   TMO Forum Mod Posts: 3547 Joined: 15 Jun 2001
Subject:

For anyone to be of any help, to say that it continually crashes is not actually much use. Can you give a better idea of what you are doing when it crashes? Does it fall over immediately upon starting up? is it a particular type of process that you're executing that is causing a problem?

Close Name:Guest
Subject: text editor?

If you think iWork is just a glorified text editor, you need to spend some more time with it. I've migrated completely off of Word on my G5 in the last year and embraced Pages -- tired of the crashes, slug speed and awful templates. And for those of you who don't think visuals and presentation matter in your documents, you must be working in IT. A great-looking report is well worth the 30% or 40% sacrifice in Word functionality, which no one uses anyway.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated January 8th

Wed, 6:20 PM
Macworld Expo 2009 - Ecamm Introduces World’s First Bluetooth Webcam
6:16 PM
News - Verbatim Announces Speaker Keyboard, Store ‘n’ Go Micro USB Drive
6:09 PM
Photo Gallery - Photo Gallery: Macworld 2009 Day 2
3:24 PM
Just a Thought - First Time Macworld Impression
12:16 PM
News - EMC Issues Beta of Retrospect 8.0 Backup Software
12:04 PM
News - REAL Server 2009 to Ship Next Month
11:40 AM
News - Livescribe to Bring Pulse Smartpen Software to Mac
10:58 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Reader Reactions: Apple’s Macworld Expo Keynote
10:39 AM
News - Verbatim, Lexar Introduce New Flash Storage Options
10:20 AM
Editorial - Don’t shoot the messenger: Content, Not Delivery Marred Apple’s Last Keynote
9:51 AM
News - LaCie Releases 2big Quadra External Hard Drive Line
9:29 AM
News - Microsoft’s Mac Business Unit Reveals Upcoming Office Improvements

The Mac Observer Reader Specials