The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Vista Branding Confuses Vista Marketing Exec

Vista Branding Confuses Vista Marketing Exec

by , 2:15 PM EST, November 28th, 2007

In the lawsuit against Microsoft and its use of the term "Windows Vista Capable" on PCs even Microsoft's director of marketing was confused by the term, a term that Microsoft Corp. claimed wasn't confusing at all, according to C|Net on Wednesday.

According to the plaintiffs, Dianne Kelley and Kenenth Hansen, Microsoft wasn't being upfront when it authorized the label "Vista Capable" on PCs. In their complaint, they claim that the label suggests that the computer could run all versions of Vista when, in fact, it could only run Home Basic.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs pointed out that even Microsoft's director of marketing, Mark Croft, had become confused during testimony. Mr. Croft explained at first that "capable" meant that the PC could run any version, as opposed to the term "ready" which would have the connotation that the PC would run in some improved way.

After a consult with his attorneys, Mr. Croft said that he'd made "an error" and retracted his previous statement, and said that "capable" means that the PC would be "able to run a version of Vista."

The plaintiff's attorneys keyed in on this confusion quickly: "Mr. Croft understood Microsoft's logo to be telling customers that PCs would run not only the stripped-down Vista Home Basic, but also what plaintiffs contend are the 'real' versions of Vista: the ones that include Microsoft's heavily marketed 'Vista features.' Ironically, Mr. Croft's understanding of what 'Windows Vista capable' means is the same understanding that Microsoft asserts no consumer would be justified in having."

Microsoft claims that it had informed OEMs, retailers and press about what "Vista Capable" means.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:noworryz Posts: 7 Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Subject: Select a Vista

The wheel just stopped on "Lose a Turn."

Close Name:xmattingly Posts: 266 Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Subject: I only have one comment:

Bwah-haha-hahaha! Vista is such a convoluted, mangled mess that they don't even know how to market it! Oh, that is just too rich.

Close Name:gopher Posts: 291 Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Subject: Vista's View = Clear as mud.

No wonder they are confused. With 12 different versions of Vista, what is capable and what is not?

Close Name:geoduck Posts: 1922 Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Subject:

With Leopard; >867Mhz & 512Mb of RAM and it will run. You get all the features, all the bells and whistles. No muss, no fuss, no confusion.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
geoduck wrote:
With Leopard; >867Mhz & 512Mb of RAM and it will run. You get all the features, all the bells and whistles. No muss, no fuss, no confusion.


Not quite; I have a 1ghz 12" powerbook 768 megs and some of the eye candy is off in 10.5.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Not entirely correct...

In order to get all the "bells and whistles" with Leopard you MUST have a video card that is fully supported by CoreImage.

While the core functionality of Leopard will be there, the eye candy may be missing if your machine lacks the required hardware.


This is in many ways similar to Vista, except Leopard comes in a feature-complete package and dynamically/transparently disables features your hardware can not support, as opposed to expecting users to pick and chose the features they desire.

Close Name:Steve Ballmer Guest
Subject: What capable means is obvious!

[deleted - will this idiot never learn? Thou shalt not troll, neither shalt thou spam!]

Close Name:Guest
Subject: To many Vista's not enough System

Microsoft blew it with 6 versions and only 1 that actually has the full features of Vista in it. It's called being greedy and taking your money with the other 5 knowing someday you'll want to buy that ultimate version because it doesn't have the features in the other 5 versions. Tests just released also show that Vista is twice as slow as XP.

So get a Mac with leopard pre-installed and you'll have the ultimate version because Apple wants you to take advantage of all of Leopards features all the time. And leopard runs faster and is 32/64 bit native. No special 64 bit apps to worry about too.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Awsome

Thanks for saving us from the pain of another post from this idioso...

Close Name:daemon Posts: 344 Joined: 17 May 2007
Subject:

Microsoft made a mistake in creating so many different versions of Vista. I personally wish they would go to a single version.

As far as this lawsuit goes, you might as well sue Apple for selling laptops labled "capable of displaying millions of colors," oh wait, that already happened.

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 3149 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject:

Quote
daemon wrote:
As far as this lawsuit goes, you might as well sue Apple for selling laptops labled "capable of displaying millions of colors," oh wait, that already happened.


Just like every other laptop manufacturer in the world. Not just Apple.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Vista out of touch

I understand the logic behind 2 OS levels. But Microsoft has lost touch with reality when it comes to where they draw the line between them. I see a settlement offer in the plaintiffs future.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated May 23rd

Wed, 9:31 AM
How-To - How to Configure a Static DHCP Reservation with Airport Extreme
8:57 AM
News - Apple’s Jonathan Ive Knighted in London
8:21 AM
Product News - Apple Camera Raw Update Adds Canon, Olympus Support
7:50 AM
TMO Quick Tip - Mac OS X: Handy Terminal Dock Tweaks
Tue, 9:51 PM
News - NPD: Apple Dominates Q1 Mobile PC Shipments
7:17 PM
Apple Stock Watch - Barclays: Apple Is So Big…
4:01 PM
Deal Brothers - New Mac Pro 12 Core 2.66GHz Intel Xeon:  $4739
4:00 PM
Analysis - Estimated Apple TV Sales to Date: 6.3 Million
3:20 PM
Video Review - Buffalo AirStation WZR-D1800H 802.11ac Router Video Review
1:47 PM
News - Apple’s Brand Value Grows 19%, Remains World’s Top Brand
11:13 AM
News - Galaxy Tab Injunction Hearing Set for June 7
10:35 AM
MGG Answers - How to Troubleshoot Connection Issues on Public Wi-Fi Networks

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Macsales.com SuperSpeed SSDs from $58. Transform your Mac with an SSD Solution of up to 960GB! You won't believe it's the same machine! Once you experience an OWC SSD, no going back! - Macsales.com
  • Mac RAM Upgrades: MacBook Pro 16GB kits $475, 8GB Kits for $119.99! iMac 16GB RAM Kits (4x 4GB) for $229.99! Mac Pro Memory 32GB Kit for $399.99, 64GB Kit for $889.99! Mac Hard Drives 2TB Seagate SATA II for $249.99! Click Here!
  • Macpokeronline.com If you're using a Mac, then you've gotta check out PokerOnAMac.com. Online casinos and poker rooms are literally giving away cash and the casino sites at Poker on a Mac do the unthinkable, they actually reward! Join today, the download is free!
  •  Looking to find online casinos for mac? We can help you find the best real money casino sites where you can play your favorite casino games including blackjack and slots.

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!