The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

DealsOnTheWeb Daily Deal: 8GB iPod Touch: $229 Delivered

Microsoft Antitrust Monitoring Extended to 2009

by , 11:15 AM EST, January 30th, 2008

Microsoft's hopes for an early end to the antitrust consent decree went out the window when U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly extended parts of the agreement out to November 12, 2009. The decree was extended because the court felt that the final judgements had not yet had a chance to work together, and blamed Microsoft for much of the delay, according to Computerworld.

Judge Kollar-Kotelly stated "Although the technical documentation project is complex and novel, it is clear, at least to the Court, that Microsoft is culpable for this inexcusable delay. To be sure, the delay has developed in stages, and at each step Microsoft commendably has been willing to work with the Plaintiffs and the TC to address issues and identify a means of resolving them."

She added "Nevertheless, practically speaking, Microsoft has never complied with" key parts of the ruling. "In addition, there is no reason why the type of documentation finally being created could not have been created from the outset if the necessary resources had been devoted to the project."

Microsoft general counsel replied to the court saying "We will continue to comply fully with the consent decree."

Microsoft found itself on the wrong end of an antitrust case several years ago when a group of states and companies contended that the Redmond-based company was abusing its monopoly status in the operating system market to gain dominance in other markets. The original court ruling ordered Microsoft to be broken into two separate companies, but a later ruling reversed that and instead forced the company to share information that would make it easier for competitors to develop Windows-compatible applications.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:jbruni Posts: 73 Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Subject: Attitude

There's attitude for you. The judge states that Microsoft has not complied with key portions of the ruling, and Microsoft states they will "continue" to comply fully.

So does that mean they will continue not to comply?

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Friday, May 9th, 2008

Fri., 6:00 PM
iPO Free on iTunes - Aussie UFOs, StrangeThings, Hometown Tales and More
5:30 PM
StrangeCharm - Fewer Particles, More Debris ( Week of May 5)
4:05 PM
MW: The New Rules for Buying a Mac
3:15 PM
OpenOffice 3.0 beta Released for Mac OS X
1:30 PM
Pogue: Time Capsule is So Simple, Just Ignore It
1:05 PM
C|Net: Why Apple Should Build a Game Console
10:45 AM
Hot Forum Topic - The iPhone's March Across the World
10:20 AM
Mailplane 2 Beta Includes OmniFocus Support
9:45 AM
iPodObserver - Apple Canada Offers $45 Credit in iPod Suit
9:05 AM
Apple Settles Power Adapter Suit
8:05 AM
Microsoft Dissolves Yahoo Proxy Board
7:30 AM
TMO Quick Tip - Tracking Application Updates in Dashboard
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $183.45. Change Today: -1.61.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb