The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Time Capsule's Term "Server Grade" Examined

Time Capsule's Term "Server Grade" Examined

by , 2:45 PM EST, March 3rd, 2008

Apple uses the term "server grade" in its description of the hard disk in the Time Capsule. On Monday, The Register discussed a Time Capsule that was taken apart, and Tony Smith concluded that the term may be used somewhat loosely.

One buyer who took his Time Capsule apart and provided photographs noted that it contained a Hitachi 1 TB Deskstar 7K1000, model HDS721010KLA330, designed for "networked storage servers." However, Hitachi's caveat is that, unlike the higher level model designed for rugged 24x7 server use, namely the Ultrastar A7K1000, the model in the Time Capsule is designed for "lower duty cycle environments in the enterprise storage hierarchy."

At Tidbits on Monday, it was reported that Apple senior product manager Jai Chulani said "server grade" means "the same 7200 rpm drives used for Apple's Xserve servers, and that they have a higher mean time between failure (MTBF) rating than consumer drives." That MTBF for "server grade" was placed at 1 million hours.

Mr. Smith at The Register noted that the technical term "server grade" lacks a standard definition, but felt that such a term, in his opinion, belonged to a drive more rugged than Hitachi's Deskstar.

In his blog on Saturday, Victor Cajiao agreed and pointed out that the Deskstar data sheet declines to provide an explicit MTBF number, something that server grade drives, like the Barracuda ES.2 drives, typically do.

In any case, it seems that Apple's industry term, intended to convey a simple idea, is getting some close scrutiny from observers. Not helping matters is the generally recognized idea that drive manufacturers themselves use estimation methodologies for MTBF that is regarded as optimistic. Despite that, higher MTBFs are still better than lower MTBFs -- at least when users get to know what they are.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:LaurieF -   TMO Forum Mod Posts: 3547 Joined: 15 Jun 2001
Subject: That'd do me fine.

At one million hours being over 114 years, it qualifies as server grade for me. I could live with 100,000 mtbf, but I'd want an extra one just to be sure!

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

I would prefer time machine to have two drives with staggered backups to both.

That is the way I have my file server set up to back up my principal workstation over a network, using Retrospect, under Mac OS X Tiger.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

..and thats the problem with MTBF figures. 1 million hours does not equate to 114 years in MTBF terms.

Basically if you had 1 million drives running in a specified environment, then one drive from that population would fail every hour.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated July 6th

Mon, 11:17 AM
Ted Landau's User Friendly View - Apple’s LED Cinema Display: A Too Short Story
11:11 AM
Product News - Photo Recovery for Mac Adds Photoshop Support
10:39 AM
Hot Forum Topic - iPhones in Education
8:47 AM
News - Apple Employee Injured in Store Shooting
Fri, 10:29 AM
News - Apple Warns of Learning Interchange Security Breach
7:30 AM
News - Happy Fourth of July!
Thu, 6:07 PM
TMO Scoop - Psystar Moves to Drop Bankruptcy Ahead of Apple Legal Battle
5:37 PM
News - Uncomfirmed Reports Say Apple & Nvidia On The Outs
4:57 PM
News - Microsoft Sick Over Barf Ad
4:09 PM
Product News - KRK Ships R6 Passive Studio Monitor for Recording
3:45 PM
John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 7/2)  Juiced, Joost and Goosed
3:12 PM
Product News - ExactScan 2 Pro Released

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!