The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Returning to U.S. with a Computer Poses Risks for Private Data

Returning to U.S. with a Computer Poses Risks for Private Data

by , 3:00 PM EDT, May 2nd, 2008

A recent ruling by a U.S. Court allows border patrol agents to inspect and search a notebook computer or other digital device without limitation, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). Travelers cannot be forced to divulge the password for encrypted disks, but the computer can still be seized.

Travelers and their employers are increasingly concerned that Custom and Border Protection agents could compromise sensitive information, trade secrets and private attorney-client communications. The EFF and other organizations have sent a letter to Congress asking for legislation to protect travelers from unlimited government scrutiny of their notebooks computers and smartphones at the borders.

Currently, travelers have several options. They can leave their computers at home. Or they could travel with a sanitized computer intended to only create content that is later encrypted and transmitted back to their employer's offices. Another tactic is security through obscurity -- hope that the border agents aren't too curious. However, if they do become curious, the CBP has the authority to detain the traveler or seize property. A federal court has ruled that the password doesn't have to be divulged, but declining to provide that information could mean confiscation of the computer. Finally, travelers who may have sensitive information on their smartphone are advised to enable the password lock before heading to the airport.

"There are no options that provide perfect privacy protection, but there are some options that reduce the likelihood that a legitimate international traveler's confidential information will be subjected to arbitrary and capricious examination," Jennifer Granick wrote for the EFF.

Recent Headlines - Updated August 21st

Thu,9:02 AM
Samsung Doesn’t Have to Pay Apple Attorney Fees Because iPhone wasn’t Famous
Wed,9:40 PM
Week Of Who, Day 3: Craigy Who and Mr Timey Pants
6:49 PM
ACM 268: Apple Copycats, Ad Agencies, and Steve Ballmer: Sports Mogul
6:38 PM
Jeff Gamet, John Martellaro Talk Sci-Fi Tech on MacVoices
5:26 PM
Limefuel Lite USB Battery Pack for Dual Charging: $34.99
2:22 PM
Guest Pass for iOS 7 Allows Access to Your Wi-Fi Network Without Revealing the Password
1:25 PM
Parallels Announces Desktop 10 for the Mac with Yosemite Support
1:07 PM
TMO Daily Observations: 2014-08-20
10:58 AM
RunKeeper Wants to Give You Presents for Working Out
9:44 AM
Analyst: No Apple iWatch this Year
8:45 AM
3 Handy Tips to Make Preview More Productive
Tue,10:07 PM
Apple’s Stock Sets Record Closing High, Market Cap Record Still Waits
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!