The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple vs. Psystar Case Takes a Detour

TMO Reports - Apple vs. Psystar Case Takes a Detour

by , 1:55 PM EDT, October 16th, 2008

In the Apple vs. Psystar case in the Northern District of California, both parties have agreed to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Which party asked for this cannot be known at this point, or even if they did. Sometimes a judge will strongly urge the parties to enter into voluntary ADR.

An attorney, who is following the case and wishes to remain anonymous, told TMO on Thursday that he discovered that the ADR process has been initiated and both parties have agreed to it.

"ADR is a private process whereby both parties can meet and work out a resolution in lieu of going to trial," he said. "Exactly why this has happened is not known at this point."

Under ADR, the parties "(1) Meet in non-binding arbitration (essentially the arbitrator judges the parties' case by hearing their argument on the law and facts but has no authority to impose a settlement or adjudicate the matter); (2) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is where an expert has the parties submit their statement of the facts and the law and provides each of them with his evaluation of the merits of their case (this evaluation of the each party's case by a neutral expert facilitates settlement); and (3) Mediation is where the mediator get between the parties and simply tries to help the parties reach a negotiated settlement," he wrote.

This process will still require several months, but the outcome could result in a negotiated settlement, the terms of which could also remain secret.

Some notable recent events appear to relate to the case. Apple recently received a patent on the Mac OS X dock and President Bush recently signed into law a strengthened copyright bill that steepens penalties for intellectual property infringement. However, it's not possible to know, at this point, why the ADR was initiated, and the outcome, held private, may never be known to outsiders.


Recent TMO Headlines - Updated September 29th

Thu, 5:41 PM
Display Panel Orders Show iPhone Sales Higher Than Last Year
Thu, 3:46 PM
Adobe Launches Photoshop Elements 2023 and Premiere Elements 2023: Apple Silicon Upgrades, New AI Features and More
Thu, 2:58 PM
Ad-Free Instagram Experience 'OG App' Removed from Apple App Store
Thu, 2:17 PM
Apple Announces 4Q22 Earnings Call on October 27
Thu, 2:10 PM
iOS 16.1 Beta 3 Allows Users to Preload In-App Content After Install
Thu, 1:43 PM
Analysts Say, "What did Bloomberg Say?"
Thu, 1:07 PM
Hiker Tests the Apple Watch Ultra On A Three-Day Hiking and Backpacking Adventure in Scottish Highlands
Thu, 12:49 PM
Cloudflare Releases API That Will Bring iOS 16 Feature Bypassing CAPTCHAs to More Websites
Thu, 11:56 AM
Kuo: iPhone 15 May See Further Segmentation Between Pro and Pro Max
Thu, 3:00 AM
An Intervention Call and a Secret Science Project - TMO Daily Observations 2022-09-29
Wed, 4:24 PM
Apple TV+ Announces New Untitled Documentary Featuring 'Korea's Mermaids'
Wed, 3:45 PM
Apple Looking to Ready Apple Music Classical for Debut Sometime This Year
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Daily Observations
  • TMO on Twitter!