The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Obama Embraces Net Neutrality, Plans to Hire National CTO

Obama Embraces Net Neutrality, Plans to Hire National CTO

by , 5:05 PM EST, November 7th, 2008

President-elect Barack Obama's transition team has published its Technology Agenda, a plan that includes embracing and promoting Net Neutrality and plans for the nation's first Chief Technology officer. The policy position also speaks to a right to privacy as it relates to technology, the First Amendment and the Internet, using technology to allow access to government, reforming the patent system, and improving access to next-generation broadband access.

Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality is the label for the concept that all traffic on the Internet should have equal access to bandwidth -- in other words, under Net Neutrality, Internet providers can not block or slowdown traffic (think Bit-torrent), or speed it up (think content companies paying to make their traffic arrive faster than the competition's) based on its source, destination, or who owns it.

Net Neutrality has been under fire from content providers and content companies for years, with an army of lobbyists having sought to promote policies and legislation that would allow their clients to control more of what happens on the Internet. President-elect Obama's position supporting Net Neutrality is the highest profile such position yet.

From the Technology Agenda, "A key reason the Internet has been such a success is because it is the most open network in history. It needs to stay that way. Barack Obama strongly supports the principle of network neutrality to preserve the benefits of open competition on the Internet."

National CTO

Chief Technology Officers have heretofore been found almost exclusively in the ranks of technology companies and Fortune 500 corporations. According to the Technology Agenda, the Obama White House will appoint a CTO for the executive branch of government. From its description, this will not be a Cabinet level appointment, but will likely be closer in terms of power and responsibility to the position of "Drug Czar," as first appointed by the first President George Bush.

The CTO's job will be to "improve the exchange of information between the federal government and citizens," while also working on the security of the government's networks. In addition, the position will work on developing technology-related policies for the White House, and work on insuring that the federal government's computing infrastructure is "best in class," and that they "share best practices."

It is quite likely that the administration will be raiding a number of Silicon Valley companies to fill this position, as well as the team of people the CTO will use to help administer this position. It will be interesting to see if the CTO's position results in any shift in power between Windows, Mac OS X, Unix, and Linux, and the use of these platforms in government.

Currently, the Bush Administration has the Office of Science & Technology Policy. It is unclear if the CTO position would be part of the OSTP, or if it would replace it.

Privacy & The First Amendment

The Technology Agenda also also directly addresses both privacy and the First Amendment, embracing the former and stressing the importance of the latter.

"The open information platforms of the 21st century can also tempt institutions to violate the privacy of citizens," the policy position said. "As president, Barack Obama will strengthen privacy protections for the digital age and will harness the power of technology to hold government and business accountable for violations of personal privacy."

That's the strongest and most specific statement of support for this fundamental freedom to have come from Washington in decades, if not ever. The advances in technology seen in the last 20 years makes the issues of privacy, technology, and politics more intertwined on practically a daily basis.

The related issues of free speech, free religion, and a free press -- guaranteed under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, also earned a plank in the Technology Agenda, with Mr. Obama pledging to help parents protect children while preserving First Amendment protections.

How the administration would achieve both goals at the same time is unclear, but the policy states, "Obama values our First Amendment freedoms and our right to artistic expression and does not view regulation as the answer to these concerns."

As part of the effort to protect children, it states, "An Obama administration will give parents the tools and information they need to control what their children see on television and the Internet in ways fully consistent with the First Amendment."

Broadband

Mr. Obama said that he intends to pursue access by all American citizens to broadband Internet access in the same way that the government has in the past ensured access to telephone service and electricity.

"[Messrs.] Obama and Biden believe we can get true broadband to every community in America through a combination of reform of the Universal Service Fund, better use of the nation's wireless spectrum, promotion of next-generation facilities, technologies and applications, and new tax and loan incentives."

This also represents a sea change from prior administrations, and it will be interesting to watch how the White House approaches this, especially in the shadow of the current financial crisis and the pressing issues of two wars.

U.S. Patent & Copyrights

The last of the major issues that falls under the purview of what we have historically covered at The Mac Observer is the patent system. The Technology Agenda pledges to protect American IP abroad (think rampant piracy of music, software, and movies throughout Asia, especially in China), while reforming the Patent system in the U.S.

Without offering details on how, the Agenda states, "Barack Obama believes we need to update and reform our copyright and patent systems to promote civic discourse, innovation and investment while ensuring that intellectual property owners are fairly treated."

Since midway through the Clinton Administration, copyright policies have shifted towards greater and greater protections for IP owners, mostly large media companies, a shift that continued during the eight years of the Bush Administration. An administration pledging to update the copyright system to "promote civil discourse, innovation and investment" represents another specific shift in direction for the executive branch.

He also addresses an issue that has often affected Apple and other technology companies, and that is the Patent system itself, including how patents are granted.

"By improving predictability and clarity in our patent system, we will help foster an environment that encourages innovation," the policy position states. "Giving the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) the resources to improve patent quality and opening up the patent process to citizen review will reduce the uncertainty and wasteful litigation that is currently a significant drag on innovation. As president, Barack Obama will ensure that our patent laws protect legitimate rights while not stifling innovation and collaboration."

Currently, a lot of patent litigation centers around patent trolls who get a patent and then look for other companies who have developed products, software, or services that use the principals covered in the patent, and then sue for licensing royalties. The wording of the Agenda suggests that the administration may well seek to change the way the system works as it relates to this issue.

The U.S. patent system hasn't undergone any major changes or upgrades in decades (with the possible exception of some of the library of patents being made available online), and updating that system would be a major challenge that would be opposed by almost as many forces as would welcome it.

Other

There are many other aspects of President-elect Obama's Technology Agenda that cover areas outside of The Mac Observer's domain, and we encourage our readers to check it out in full.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Guest
Subject: Definition incorrect

You write, "Net Neutrality is the label for the concept that all traffic on the Internet should have equal access to bandwidth." This is not correct. There are actually many definitions of "Net Neutrality," ranging from the reasonable (prohibiting anticompetitive conduct only) to the absurd (expecting broadband providers to give away bandwidth for free or allow bandwidth hogs to take over networks). Alas, many of Obama's advisors are out on the far, radical edge on this one, embracing regulation so extreme that it would force small and competitive providers out of business. Only the cable and telephone companies could survive their proposed policies, and then only by cross-subsidizing from other services.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
You write, "
Only the cable and telephone companies could survive their proposed policies, and then only by cross-subsidizing from other services.


It's the providers' own fault, for selling 'packages'. It would be simple to charge for the bandwidth used, but they don't want to.

Close Name:AlaskaBoy Posts: 4 Joined: 11 Oct 2008
Subject: http://www.savetheinternet.com/=faq

One of many articles on the subject.

What's at stake if we lose Net Neutrality?

The consequences of a world without Net Neutrality would be devastating. Innovation would be stifled, competition limited, and access to information restricted. Consumer choice and the free market would be sacrificed to the interests of a few corporate executives.

On the Internet, consumers are in ultimate control -- deciding between content, applications and services available anywhere, no matter who owns the network. There's no middleman. But without Net Neutrality, the Internet will look more like cable TV. Network owners will decide which channels, content and applications are available; consumers will have to choose from their menu.

The free and open Internet brings with it the revolutionary possibility that any Internet site could have the reach of a TV or radio station. The loss of Net Neutrality would end this unparalleled opportunity for freedom of expression.

The Internet has always been driven by innovation. Web sites and services succeeded or failed on their own merit. Without Net Neutrality, decisions now made collectively by millions of users will be made in corporate boardrooms. The choice we face now is whether we can choose the content and services we want, or whether the broadband barons will choose for us.

What's happening in Congress?

The SavetheInternet.com Coalition applauds the recent introduction of the bipartisan ?Internet Freedom Preservation Act 2008? (HR 5353). Introduced on Feb. 12, 2008 by Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Chip Pickering (R-Miss.), this landmark bill would protect Net Neutrality and spark a much-needed public conversation about the future of the Internet.

The new bill would enshrine Net Neutrality -- the longstanding principle that Internet service providers cannot discriminate against Web sites or services based on their source, ownership or destination -- into the Communications Act. It also requires the Federal Communications Commission to convene at least eight ?broadband summits? to collect public input on policies to ?promote openness, competition, innovation, and affordable, ubiquitous broadband service for all individuals in the United States.?

Big phone and cable companies like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner have been lobbying furiously to kill Net Neutrality. They want to exploit their gatekeeper power to decide what you can do on the Web.

But Markey and Pickering?s bill deals a blow to the gatekeepers by ensuring that the public -- not phone or cable companies -- control the fate of the Internet.

Contact Congress today. Tell your representative to support the "Internet Freedom Preservation Act 2008? (HR 5353) to make Net Neutrality the law of the land.

Close Name:Terrin Posts: 414 Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Subject:

I agree it is the provider's fault. They advertise these all you can get packages. They brag about how fast the network is. They could easily advertise a cap, but they choose not too.

Moreover, most of these companies are 1) getting tax breaks to build their networks, 2) paid next to nothing for use of the public airwaves, and 3) use their lobbying power to try and shut down competitors trying to offer free alternatives or competition.


Quote
Guest wrote:
Quote
Guest wrote:
You write, "
Only the cable and telephone companies could survive their proposed policies, and then only by cross-subsidizing from other services.


It's the providers' own fault, for selling 'packages'. It would be simple to charge for the bandwidth used, but they don't want to.

Close Name:Terrin Posts: 414 Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Subject:

It is nice to give criticism. It would be nicer if you cited examples of your concerns. Otherwise it just looks like you are gripping just for the sake of gripping.


Quote
Guest wrote:
You write, "Net Neutrality is the label for the concept that all traffic on the Internet should have equal access to bandwidth." This is not correct. There are actually many definitions of "Net Neutrality," ranging from the reasonable (prohibiting anticompetitive conduct only) to the absurd (expecting broadband providers to give away bandwidth for free or allow bandwidth hogs to take over networks). Alas, many of Obama's advisors are out on the far, radical edge on this one, embracing regulation so extreme that it would force small and competitive providers out of business. Only the cable and telephone companies could survive their proposed policies, and then only by cross-subsidizing from other services.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: net neutrality

In my opinion without net neutrality the Internet would eventually resemble in every aspect it's cable or phone providers. Bland and less and less important as people would embrace other new technology to fulfill their needs to communicate. A little like the fledgling emergence of pirate television in the late 80's early 90's or radio before that. The interest of people is quite fickle and will flow to something else quite fast any greedy corperations simply can't help themselves from dysecting the goose to extract every speck of gold NOW !!! thus killing it and forgoing future eggs. This has and is demonstrated time and time again.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Zero Marginal Cost = Zero Profits for ISPs

A major economic problem for ISPs - particularly backbone providers - is that the cost of an additional bit on the network is essentially zero. In a competitive market, the price will be driven to the marginal cost, and network providers won't make any money.

Early in the 20th century, economists knew that nobody would build a telephone system unless there was money to be made, so government-sanctioned monopolies were permitted, in return for regulation which was intended to prevent the telephone companies from gouging consumers.

Unfortunately, we all know how well the phone monopolies worked out. Yet the question remains: who is going to want to be a network provider if the price is driven to zero by competition and zero marginal cost?

Close Name:Guest
Subject: The link to see the paper is gone...

yes it is... gone...

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated February 11th

Fri, 8:10 PM
News - Apple Sues Motorola Mobility in California Over German Case
7:54 PM
Free on iTunes - OnLive Desktop: Windows & Office on Your iPad
7:43 PM
Product News - Apple Rolls Out MacBook Air Configurations for Education
6:35 PM
Just a Peek - Battle Pocket Bulge With The Hint for iPhone
6:01 PM
Rumor - Apple Reportedly Bringing MacBook Air Styling to Pro Line
4:50 PM
Particle Debris - The Hidden Gotchas of Browser Security
3:56 PM
Apple Stock Watch - Analyst: Paying a Dividend Makes Sense for Apple
2:58 PM
Deal Brothers - iMac 27-inch 2.93GHz Intel Quad-Core i7 processor:  $1,999
2:45 PM
In-Depth Review - Theodolite App for iOS is Breathtaking
12:52 PM
Apple Stock Watch - Mizuho Securities Starts Apple Coverage with $635 Target
11:35 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Forum Poll: Are You Planning on Buying a New iPad?
11:00 AM
Analysis - Competitors Size up Apple’s iBooks Author

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • TypeStyler 11 is now in the Mac App Store!! -- Special Introductory Price of $59.95!! -- To Buy From The Mac App Store Click Here Now!! Or buy direct from Strider Software.
  • Mac RAM Upgrades: MacBook Pro 16GB kits $475, 8GB Kits for $119.99! iMac 16GB RAM Kits (4x 4GB) for $229.99! Mac Pro Memory 32GB Kit for $399.99, 64GB Kit for $889.99! Mac Hard Drives 2TB Seagate SATA II for $249.99! Click Here!
  • Poker Mac If you're using a Mac, then you've gotta check out Online Poker Mac. This mac poker and online casino mac site actually does the unthinkable, it actually rewards!
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!