The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: BMO Capital Forecasts 2.4M+ Macs For the Quarter

Just a Thought - Benchmarks: Not Just For Geeks Anymore

by - May 28th, 2004

So, I was thinking about doing the OS X 10.3.4 update when it occurred to me that it is entirely possible that the update could make my already slow 450mhz G4 Cube run even slower. "But how do I test such things," I asked myself. "Dude, benchmarks," was my reply, and I slapped my forehead for not having thought of it earlier.

There happens to be several benchmark tools available for OS X; I picked Haxial's Benchmark for no particular reason, and ran it, making sure that nothing else was running. I then filed away the results and did the update.

Once the update was completed I ran the benchmark tool again and compared the before and after update results. Much to my relief, there was no big difference.

Benchmark: CPU & RAM Benchmark: CPU & RAM
Version: 1.000 Version: 1.000
Date/Time: 27 May 2004, 06:33:21 PM Date/Time: 27 May 2004, 11:10:08 PM
Operating System: MacOS 10.3.3 Operating System: MacOS 10.3.4
Total Time: 96,073 millisecs (1:36) Total Time: 96,193 millisecs (1:36)
Average Speed: 175.6M bytes/second Average Speed: 175.4M bytes/second
Time Speed Time Speed
Memory Copy: 8,874 126.2M/sec Memory Copy: 9,443 118.6M/sec
Memory Fill: 9,195 522.0M/sec Memory Fill: 9,159 524.0M/sec
Memory Clear: 9,656 497.0M/sec Memory Clear: 9,573 501.4M/sec
Memory Equal: 9,676 115.7M/sec Memory Equal: 9,783 114.4M/sec
CRC: 12,371 51.7M/sec CRC: 12,274 52.1M/sec
Quick Hash: 12,371 51.7M/sec Quick Hash: 12,276 52.1M/sec
Secure Hash: 9,447 33.8M/sec Secure Hash: 9,365 34.1M/sec
Encryption: 24,483 6.5M/sec Encryption: 24,320 6.5M/sec
Haxial Benckmark before update Haxial Benckmark after 10.3.4 update

Benchmark tools are kinda interesting because they can give you an idea of how well your system is performing, which is especially useful around update time. What's even better is to compare your results with those of other benchmarkers. Haxial's Benchmark tool is pretty basic, and doesn't have much backend support (it is free after all).

There are other free benchmark tools, including SpeedRun, which I didn't try, and Xbench, which has a Web site where you can send your data and compare it to others. My Cube compared fairly well against other Cubes. I'm not endorsing Haxial's Benchmark or Xbench, but I'll use both the next time I update; I'm leaning towards Xbench because it has a more comprehensive battery of tests then Haxial's product, including graphics and AltiVec tests.

What I like about these benchmark tools is that the average Joe or Jill can run it and see something meaningful from the data, yet, those of us who get a kick out of numbers labeled 'Mops/sec' can also get our jollies.

So, benchmarking; it's fun, interesting, and useful. Give it a shot, see what you think.

is a writer who currently lives in Orlando, FL. He's been a Mac fan since Atari Computers folded, but has worked with computers of nearly every type for 20 years.

You can send your comments directly to me, or you can also post your comments below.

Most Recent Columns From Just A Thought

The Just A Thought Archives

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:jonkroupa Posts: 48 Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Subject: More than once.

It is better to run the benchmark more than once, after a fresh remote, and take the average of a few runs. random factors can influence the numbers, like maybe the operating system desided to page some memory to disk right as you ran it the first time.

Close Name:VSeward -   TMO Staff Posts: 971 Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Subject: Re:More than once

Yeah, I guess I should have mentioned that. I did, in fact, run the Haxial Benchmark 3 times. What you see is the best of the three before and after.

I didn't notice much of a change with the Haxial benchmark, but with Xbench, the first run was really slow, the 2nd was better and the 3rd and 4th were better still, but not by much.

Weird.

Vern Seward

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

Tue., 6:55 PM
User Friendly Blog by Ted Landau - Why User Interface Design Matters
4:30 PM
Apple Trackpad Secrets and Technical History
4:05 PM
iPodObserver - Apple: What to Bring When Buying iPhone 3G
3:35 PM
Microsoft: We Have a Noisy Competitor
2:50 PM
Columnist: Safari Security Fails to Learn from Past
2:20 PM
iPodObserver - Services to Unlock Mobile Phones Gaining Momentum
1:00 PM
Daylite 3.7.4 Adds iWork 08, Dialectic Integration
12:20 PM
FoneLink 2.1 Adds Support for More Cell Phones
11:25 AM
Freeway 5.1.3 Adds Chinese Support
11:10 AM
iPodObserver - Rumor: Canadian Apple Stores Won't Sell iPhone 3G
10:35 AM
Microsoft Aligns with Icahn for Yahoo Takeover
10:00 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Is Internet Killing the Video Star?
8:20 AM
iPodObserver - MobileMe Launches on July 10
7:55 AM
iPodObserver - Apple: iPhone 3G Launches at 8AM Friday
6:00 AM
iPO Review - BudFits
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Special Report: WWDC 2008
  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!
  • New Media Expo 2008

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $179.55. Change Today: +4.39.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb