The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

Featured Article: Consumer Reports: Apple #1 in Tech Support

Just a Thought - Scan of the Beholder

by

- May 31st, 2005

Vern Seward takes a moment away from Mac commentary to look at another area of technology (and privacy).

"Hurry Babe, we're gonna be late for our flight."

I grabbed my keys and did a quick scan around my living room to insure that I wasn't leaving anything obvious. I was positive that I would find that I left something behind when me and Carol arrived in Hawaii, but it never hurts to look, especially since I know that Carol would be another few minutes getting ready.

The wall says it's nearly 3:30 PM on August 4, 2012, our flight leaves in an hour. Calling to her again is futile, but I need to get her moving a bit quicker. "If we miss this flight there won't be another one until tomorrow, and we'll have to fly stand-by."

From somewhere beyond the opposite side of the living room, Carol yells her reply, "I'll be ready in a minute! Keep your shirt on!"

I smile. Carol and I have been married for 9 years, and I don't mind that she takes her time to dress for a trip. Last night's packing, however, took all of 5 hours to cram 2 large suitcases full of her clothes and accessories. I had finished my packing in 45 minutes.

Even so, I won't complain, she always looks great.

Now, with the new scanners at the airports, Carol had made an extra effort to look especially good...naked; in preparation for our Hawaiian vacation, Carol had spent extra time at the gym, and ran 5 miles everyday instead of her usual 3 miles. She tanned, and waxed herself until she could have ignited lust in a 90 year old blind quadriplegic while dressed in a hooded down parka, loose fitting fatigues, and mukluks.

Of course, what she was wearing would make no difference to the new airport scanners; these new devices could easily peer through layers of clothing as easily as if they were made of clear plastic.

When they were first installed there was such a public uproar, especially here in the States, that many wondered if the airports would be forced to abandon them, or, at the very least, use them only on a selected few passengers, and even only then with the passenger's consent. People were so afraid that someone would see them as bare as the second they were born

The scanners, back-scatter scanners they are called because the device looks for x-ray energy reflected from selected materials instead of the more powerful x-rays that go through the body and reveal what's inside, can detect a variety of items that may be on or even just under the skin. The resulting topographical image can be very detailed, revealing hair, and skin imperfection with astonishing clarity.

"Sweety, please! We're gonna be late!"

"Bob, I'm ready! Quit your yelling!"

Indeed, she is ready, and she looks like a cross between a fitness trainer and a model for Vicky Sue (Victoria Secrets), except that she is dressed to the nines. I look like I wrestle snakes for a living, but she likes the way I dress, she says it suits my personality. If I didn't know her better I'd say she likes the way I dress because it contrasts her attire so well; I become sort of like a frumpy backdrop to a living portrait of Venus De Milo. Whatever, she's with me and that's what matters.

We get to the airport a half hour before the flight is scheduled to take off. In the old days, before the back-scatter scanners, you had to arrive at least an hour and a half before your flight was due to leave in order to go through all of the security checks, and scans. Now, with the new back-scatter scanners, and luggage scanners that seek out not only objects that appear lethal, but compounds in sufficient quantities that, when combined, could create an explosive device, the process of detecting would-be hijackers, terrorists, and other miscreants has become streamlined and efficient. Sure, we must endure a moment of embarrassment, but it's a small price to pay for relative freedom and safety.

As we step up to the back-scatter scanner, Carol adjusts hers clothing so as to give the operator the best possible view. She is not shy; I believe that, in a past life, she was a strip-tease artist, or maybe she was Swedish.

Ahead of us, a woman who looks old enough to be Eve's mother is causing a ruckus; she is refusing to go through the scanner, and she won't let any of the security people frisk her.

"You better not lay a hand on me, boy," she growls at the nearest guard who attempted to guide her to another area so as not to hold up the line. "I'm not going anywhere!" She waves her wooden cane ominously and glares at the guards through thick glasses. "I don't need to be escorted no where. All I want is to be sure that a woman is looking at me on the other side of this things," she raps the scanner portal with her cane. " and not some pervert who gets off watching old ladies!"

"Madam," said one brave guard who apparently was the senior guard on duty, "all of our scanner operators have gone through extensive training in discretion. I assure you that your privacy will be strictly maintained, no matter who is sitting at the controls of our scanners."

The old lady points her cane at the senior guard and narrowed her eye to little more than slits with pupils. "Son, do I look like I run a brothel?"

"Uh, no ma'am."

"Then why did you call me a madam?"

"Ahh, it's, ahh, well..."

"It's obvious you are brainless; you can't speak and they put you in charge!. Just answer one question truthfully, soon boy, and you can get through this without getting your knuckles rapped."

The senior guard reflexively rubbed his knuckles and eyed the cane suspiciously. "And your question, ma'am?"

"Is there a woman at the control of this thing right now?"

The guard spoke into a communication device, waited until he got a reply, smiled, and said, "Yes ma'am. There is a woman operator currently running this device."

At that announcement nearly all of the female passengers left the other lines lined up behind me and Carol.

Carol, on the other hand, looked very disappointed. My guess is that she wanted to give some poor guy watching the monitor a heart attack. I guess it never occurred to her that the person studying her might be a woman.

The old woman smiled and said, "that's all I wanted to know. Let's get this party started!"

She walked up to the scanner, stood with her arms out stretched as she had been instructed to do, then ambled away towards her awaiting flight,

I was next. I had long since gotten over the embarrassment of standing before some unseen person naked, and knowing that the operator was a woman brought to mind the old Seinfeld 'Shrinkage' episode, but I was never really big on modesty either. I guess Carol is rubbing off on me.

I stepped up and stood in the scanner portal for 30 seconds; I didn't feel or hear anything from the device. The green light blinked on, and I moved off to wait for Carol. I assume the female operator was too busy looking for explosives to bother to find humor in my nakedness, and would likely be equally unimpressed with Carol.

But when Carol stood in the portal the light took a full minute to change, and it turned red when it did come on. A guard escorted Carol to a room. I was told to wait outside, that it would not take long.

Sure enough, moments later, Carol emerged from the room, and she had an odd smile on her face.

"Well," I asked her? "What happened?

Still smiling, Carol hands me a slip of paper. On it is a name and a phone number.

Puzzled, I hand the note back to Carol. "From the guard," I inquire?

She snickers as she balls the note up and deposits it in a waste can that we were passing. "From the operator."

"But the name on the paper was Harold..."

"Yep!" Then she glances back at all of the women who now stood in the line that we were in.

is a writer who currently lives in Orlando, FL. He's been a Mac fan since Atari Computers folded, but has worked with computers of nearly every type for 20 years.

You can send your comments directly to me, or you can also post your comments below.

Most Recent Columns From Just A Thought

The Just A Thought Archives

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:kenaustus Posts: 601 Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Subject: Been there, done that

I was asked if I would volunteer for a trial of the scanner at London's Heathrow. Didn't bother me so I said sure - it actually takes a little longer than going through the metal detector and I still had to do the metal detector bit.

I was interested in the scanner so I asked to see the screen. Bad decision as it clearly showed that I need to loose some weight. I actually felt sorry for the guy working the system - what he sees all day ain't pretty. Enough to put a guy off his dinner.

Sorry Vern - they will be using same sex personnel. The religious right will make sure of that. The only concern you might have is if Harold had asked Carol to hand the note to you . . .

Close Name:metavurt Posts: 163 Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Subject: Religious Right? ha ha ha

Actually... the religious right will make sure there's always a man in charge because um.. women aren't really that equal. trust me, i grew up with it.

Close Name:Tiger Posts: 906 Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Subject: nah

I predict the end to all air travel before this comes into being.

All of humanity who use air travel will be punished for the misbehavior of the few who feel it is within their right to abuse and misuse this wonderful privelege. That's why we'll never see flying cars. Too easy to make a weapon out of them.

Hopefully, genetic screening will advance well enough that we can prevent the proliferation of criminals and terrorists. Oh wait, that's a horrible idea.

Welcome to our brave new world.

View Name:Guest
Subject: boot-y-licious
View Name:Guest
Subject:
View Name:Guest
Subject: Unintended consequences
Close Name:iggyb Posts: 112 Joined: 09 May 2003
Subject: lay off the conservatives

It's not just the right-wingers who will have a problem, thinking it's a type of R-rated fun for the operators. The ACLU is already emphatically against this, and many people on both sides of the fence are crying invasion of privacy. And, I happen to agree. This goes a little far, in my opinion.

On the other hand, I guess we'll finally be able to purchase real X-Ray Vision goggles that were always advertised in the back of the Marvel Comics...

Close Name:GaelDesign Posts: 13 Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Subject: What's with all the right-wing hate?

I don't what everyone's up in a tizzy over in terms of the "evil" right-wingers. I'm someone that could be called a "Religious Right" conservative (even though I try to be smarter than to follow labels like sheep), and I think this idea sucks. Frankly, the Religion Right folks are usually the ones who ARE all worried about family values, nudity, etc. (someones to an over-extreme degree), so why would they like these kinds of X-ray devices?

Personally, I place the blame on the government security people who don't have a blanced view of security vs. privacy. And those kinds of people have little to do with left/right/Republican/Democrat. Anyone who rises to political power often loses perspective, and that's just the nature of the beast. I normally can't stand the ACLU, but I'll back them on this one.

Cheers,

Jared

Close Name:Al Swearengen Posts: 339 Joined: 10 May 2005
Subject: Cargo?

As a card carrying nudist I don't have a an issue with people of either sex or sexual orientation looking at my body. Like kenaustus said, the security person is going to tired of looking at bodies all day long, they need to concentrate on finding non-metalic knives and other weapons.

I hope that they start doing a better job checking air cargo that is shipped on passenger flights, that still seems to be weak spot.

View Name:Guest
Subject: Americans would be funny...
Close Name:kenaustus Posts: 601 Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Subject: Oooops

Jared

My comment was that the RR would ensure that there is no cross gender checking IF this did come about. I happen to believe that the RR is a rather strong political force that no administration wants to get mad from the wrong person looking at the scans. While I'm strongly center minded (tend to believe that both sides can have good and bad ideas) my comment wasn't a dig at the RR, but a comment on their power to ensure some level of propriety if this happens.

Frankly I would feel sorry for the scanners if this is put into place, but have no problem going thru it - if the scanners can handle me going through then I can too . . .

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 2836 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: Americans would be funny...

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
...if they weren't so dangerous. You have far more chance of dying in your car - and the odds of that happening are low enough that everyone forgets about it most of the time. This big brother stuff just makes what we were worrying about in the sixties and seventies a reality. Terrorists aren't the bad guys - they are generally victims who have had enough. Someday, believe it or not, you might be considered the terrorist - and God help you if you are.


Trying to figure out how Osama Bin Laden is the victim.... Or Timothy McVeigh...

I agree that terrorism is in the eye of the beholder, but to say they are victims is a bit of a stretch.

But, if you subscribe to that theory, then why are the "victims" in Iraq killing far more civilians than combatants? Were they victimized by the Iraqi people? And why are the vast majority of these "victims" coming in from other countries to kill these civilians? Why are they coming from Jordan, and Saudi Arabia and Syria to fight? Why are they not fighting in their own countries, where they would have been victimized? We certainly haven't been blowing them up in crowds in those countries.

It is possible, just possible, that some people just like to kill other people.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Monday, May 12th, 2008

Mon., 4:50 PM
Subversive T-shirt Buried Under Apple's Boston Store
3:45 PM
Cover Stream 2.0 Gets Search Filter and Integrated Song Browser
3:10 PM
iPodObserver - Apple Confirms a Steve Jobs WWDC Keynote Address
2:05 PM
iPO Editorial - Making Sense of an iPod superTouch
1:10 PM
TMO Appearances - TMO's Dave Hamilton to Speak at Seacoast MUG
12:35 PM
Google Releases YouTube Upload App, Vidnik
11:40 AM
Analyst: Apple to Sell 11M iPhones in 2008, 17M in 2009
11:05 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Reader Reactions: The Unavailable iPhone
10:35 AM
Apple's Boston Store to Open on May 15
10:05 AM
QuickerTek Intros MacBook Air Battery Extender
9:40 AM
iPodObserver - Rumor: New iPhones Now, Tablets at WWDC
8:40 AM
Pixelmator 1.2 Draftsman Adds Rulers, Adjustments
8:15 AM
iPodObserver - iPhone Unavailable at US, UK Apple Store
8:00 AM
iPO Ted Landau's User Friendly View - In search of headphones for my iPhone
7:30 AM
iPO Quick Tip - iPhone: Saving SMS Messages to Your Mac
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $188.16. Change Today: +4.71.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

Top Deals From DealsOnTheWeb