iWork '08, AppleWorks...and the New iMacs
 |
by
August 24th, 2007
iWork '08 is out. The software suite consists of three applications: Pages (for word processing and page layout), Keynote (for presentations), and a new spreadsheet application called Numbers. The addition of a spreadsheet has led to an obvious question: How well does iWork stack up against the other major productivity package for the Mac: Microsoft Office?
It's an interesting question, but I am more intrigued by another one: How well does it stack up against AppleWorks? Yes, AppleWorks. I explored this topic once before, after the previous version of iWork was released. Here, I return to it again for an updated assessment.
AppleWorks (for those of you unfamiliar with this gem) is an integrated software package, originally called ClarisWorks, that was a spectacularly successful product for Apple back in the 1990s. With the advent of Mac OS X, Apple pretty much abandoned the software (although it's still available from the Apple Store for Education).
Its most recent and likely final upgrade was in 2003. If you run it in Tiger, it works—but it has a clunky feel reminiscent of taking a 1940s car out for a spin on today's Interstates. Yet I have continued to use it. Why? Because it still does a few things better than any alternative.
For one, I have used AppleWorks for spreadsheets. Yes, I could have used Excel, but I preferred the simplicity of AppleWorks for the mundane tasks I generally needed done. Second, I used its Draw module for creating simple layouts, such as for the landscape redesign of my backyard. My wife even prefers AppleWorks as a basic word processor, although I long ago gave it up for Microsoft Word. The major problem with continuing to use AppleWorks for any task is that its joints get creakier every year and those joints will never be repaired.
That's why, each time a new version of iWork comes out, I put it to the AppleWorks test: Is this the version of iWork that will finally let me retire AppleWorks for good?
The answer for iWork '08 is, at last: Yes.
Let's look at Pages first. My biggest objection to previous versions of Pages is that it was too much of a page layout program and not enough of a word processor. It was great if you were trying to create a newsletter. Not so great if you simply wanted to write an article.
Apple finally seems to have realized this and now offers two modes for Pages: Word Processing and Page Layout. In truth, the differences between the two modes are minimal. But they exist. For example, in word processing mode, the default is for typed text to be placed directly onto the document page. In Page Layout, text is entered into a separate text box, that can be moved around the page like any object. The overall effect is to create a more pleasant environment for using Pages as a text-oriented word processor.
An unexpected bonus is that Pages '08's word processor adds the ability to track editing changes. This is a critical feature for professional writing, where multiple people are likely to be editing a document and need to be able to quickly see the changes made by the other(s). Previously, Microsoft Word was just about the only Mac program that provided this feature.
Pages '08 is also an adequate substitute for the Draw module in AppleWorks. To use it this way, open a blank Page Layout document and choose from the Shapes options to place objects on a page. You can then manipulate the objects via the Graphic Inspector and the Arrange menu. Minor improvements make Pages '08 an even better draw program than the previous version. For example, by default, an inserted shape can be freely moved around the page. In the previous Pages version, the default was to have a shape inserted inline with the document text. One continuing significant omission: you can't layout pages horizontally (so as to accommodate objects that are wider than can fit on one page).
Numbers is clearly superior to the spreadsheet module in AppleWorks (and you can easily import your AppleWorks files to Numbers). It's especially well-suited for "page layout" style spreadsheets, using multiple charts and tables, as opposed to one simple row-and-column sheet. Professionals will still prefer Excel, but casual users will find Numbers less intimidating and easier to use. You can't embed a Numbers spreadsheet in a Pages word processing document, as you could do in AppleWorks. Instead, Pages has its own Tables component that should suffice for most requirements of this type.
As for the rest of iWork, it's easy to summarize. For page layout tasks and slide presentations, iWork always was and continues to be far superior to AppleWorks. AppleWorks does have database and paint modules, still missing in iWork.
These are of minor concern for me, and I suspect for most other users as well. If you want a database, such as for a recipe file or a CD catalog, you are better off getting one of the many excellent and low cost programs specialized for those tasks. For many database tasks, you can probably use Numbers. AppleWorks' Paint module is too primitive to care about losing it.
Bottom line: iWork '08 can handle almost all of the tasks that might otherwise lead you to hang on to AppleWorks. In almost every respect, it handles those tasks either as well or better (often much better) than AppleWorks. This is finally it. If you haven't already done so, the time has come to put AppleWorks in the dust bin.
A word about the new iMacs
The same day that Apple announced iWork '08, it also announced a new iMac line-up. The new iMacs are thinner, faster, and better looking than their predecessors. Aside from a reflective glass screen (which I have never much liked, despite its many advocates), the new machines have a lot to recommend them. As an upgrade from the previous iMacs, however, my overall reaction is to yawn. If you weren't about to purchase a new iMac anyway, there is little in these new machines to change your mind.
While watching the Special Event where Steve Jobs revealed the new iMacs, I had the impression that even Steve was less than excited. Certainly, there was none of the energy that he generated when talking about iPhone in keynotes at Macworld Expo or WWDC. Actually, although I may be misinterpreting body language here, it looked to me as if Steve was never running on all cylinders throughout the entire talk. I started to wonder if he might be ill.
The iMac situation reminds me of a recent visit to a department store, where I happened to pass the aisle displaying pocket calculators. I was surprised to see that Texas Instruments was still selling essentially the same calculators, even using the same model names in some cases, as were available 15 to 20 years ago. One can only assume that either there is no way to improve these calculators or there is no longer any incentive to do so. Either way, the calculator market is stagnant.
The same situation apparently exists now with desktop Macs. Either there are no dramatic improvements or exciting new features possible right now—or Apple is too busy with its iPods and iPhones to spend the time and energy needed to come up with any. I suspect it is some combination of both.
Ted Landau is the founder of MacFixit, and the author of Mac OS X Help Line, Tiger Edition and other Mac help books.
Send polite comments to , or post your comments below.
User Friendly View Archives.
Observer Comments
I'm also very impressed with iWork: Pages is great, it looks vastly better than Word for page layout, I'd switch in a second. Numbers is interesting, my spreadsheet use is minimal so it should do for me, assuming I can unlearn my Excel habits.
But...
I'm waiting for the last two parts, the basic drawing module and a database. The latter especially is keeping me from making the jump.
BTW It was Appleworks on the Mac before it was ClarisWorks. Actually the name goes all the way back past the earliest days of the Mac to the Apple II days when AppleWorks was one of the first intigrated Office Suites. We used Appleworks to plan our wedding and send invites/thank you's on an Apple IIc in 1987
The one thing I especially like about the new iMac is I don't have buyer's remorse about buying an iMac in January. My "old" iMac is nearly feature-for-feature equal to the new model, and it has the magnetic holder for the remote and the "sleep" light. I am very happy with my purchase. Still.
Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:48 pm Subject: Importing AppleWorks files? ... and glossy screens
You say that "you can easily import your AppleWorks files to Numbers" -- via export to .xls, .txt, .csv, etc., or directly? I had heard that iWork was not able to import AppleWorks files directly, from any AppleWorks format to any iWork program. I've got a lot of .cwk files lying around on my hard drives, though most of them are version 5 since I started using email more often than typing letters before version 6 came out... I guess I can just store those alongside my WordPerfect 3 documents, and continue to read them via SheepShaver, if AppleWorks quits working in a future version of OS X!
And I have to concur with you about the glossy screens. I am happy with my new MacBook, but we recently decided to replace our 2002-vintage Power Mac G4/933 with an iMac, and after looking at those vast glossy screens reflecting the overhead lights in the Apple Store we decided to get a refurbished instance of "last month's model" with the matte screen. I can relocate or reorient my 13" MacBook screen to get rid of glare, but that would be awfully difficult to do with a 24" behemoth sitting on a desk in a room with lots of windows.
Quotelooper wrote:
after looking at those vast glossy screens reflecting the overhead lights in the Apple Store we decided to get a refurbished instance of "last month's model" with the matte screen.
I wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with an aftermarket way to "matte" the glssy screens. A thin layer of matte plastic, a thin coated piece of glass, or something. Call it a screen protector. Just knock the glare down a bunch and I suspect it will sell like hotcakes.
Don't you think? The touch interface is our next step up-obviously Apple is working on this, and though Surface is a 'bigass table,' it's pretty similar to Microsoft's other rushed to market me too products; surely they are working something more usable too. Recycling issues aside, the glass cover on the screen is better for a touch based interface. Mark my words: this is what we'll all be using in ten years. The displays will be next, and more and more of this technology will be integrated into OS X. Just you watch.
Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:34 pm Subject: iTouchScreens and iWork
QuoteGuest wrote:
Don't you think? The touch interface is our next step up-obviously Apple is working on this, and though Surface is a 'bigass table,' it's pretty similar to Microsoft's other rushed to market me too products; surely they are working something more usable too. Recycling issues aside, the glass cover on the screen is better for a touch based interface. Mark my words: this is what we'll all be using in ten years. The displays will be next, and more and more of this technology will be integrated into OS X. Just you watch.
I was thinking the same thing. Not as a total replacement for keyboard and mouse input or input devices, but as an option. Kid games, finger painting programs, kiosks, that sort of thing where you need easily clean the monitor surface.
The only thing I would need iWork is for Keynote. I do page layout and use InDesign a lot, for a short note or letter I use TextEdit. I will probably buy iWork and maybe get away from Excel. I have and use Excel as part of Office, but I not for crunching big spreadsheets. I never use Word for creating stuff; only to open a doc sent by a client and clean out the Word turds before putting the copy into InDesign.
I am using FileMaker as a data base, but a couple of versions behind the latest. I would love to see a FileMaker lite as part of iWork.
Am I the only person who uses the clippings feature a lot? There is some very good clip art in there and although I've often been copying and pasting the art into Pages, I still use AppleWorks a few times a week.
I'm rather nervous about that bank of extremely useful art disappearing soon.
Please Apple, leave the AppleWorks clip art online.
For the past 21 years I have operated, as a "one man shop" a school fundraising company. I run my business on AppleWorks and Quickbooks... period... oh yes.. with PowerMail for email. Most of my business work on AppleWorks is in the database. For example, I do the parent letters in the draw module, using text effects from Aldus TypeTwister 1.0. And, I'm doing this on a Twin 2.3 ghz G5 running 10.4.10. (And... my kid works for Apple as a tech.)
NOWHERE else can you do a database with over 100 layouts, some of which have auto-updating spreadsheets in the layout. NOWHERE else can you mail merge into a word processing document with a spreadsheet embedded in it, and mailmerge INTO THE SPREADSHEET and have it autocalculate for each record you merge into it. Not even Filemaker can do that.
The idea of having Filemaker Lite as a part of iWork is a great idea. Then you essentially have a new AppleWorks, because the database in AppleWorks is based on Filemaker.
Can you use Numbers in iWork as a flat file database (or even a bunch of them as relational)? Can you mailmerge into the word processor out of the spreadsheet in iWork? Can you embed a spreadsheet into a page layout document in iWork and then mailmerge into that spreadsheet from another spreadsheet?
Then there's the issue of over 100 layouts in my room grouping file, which contains room counts for over 2000 classrooms in about 70 schools, so we can count out packets and have them ready to hand out to the teachers in the school. Can ANYTHING import the layouts? NO. I can import the data into Filemaker, but would have to RECONSTRUCT EVERY LAYOUT.
AppleWorks does all that and more in my business each and every day.
I started with an Apple //e and two 5.25 floppy drives with AppleWriter and Multiplan back 25 years ago, and by the time I left teaching and opened my company I had moved up to AppleWorks for the //e, still using the two floppy drives. I was used to writing stuff in Basic, so would have gone to a DOS PC if there had been a way to port all my files to one, but there wasn't, so I went to a Mac LC and ClarisWorks. We now have 5 macs here... a blue/white G3, the twin 2.3 G5, a PowerBook G4, an iBook G4, and an Intel iMac... all wirelessly networked into WildBlue internet, and all running AppleWorks.
The open source community needs to do something to replace AppleWorks and to allow the thousands if not millions of people who depend on the AppleWorks database every day a way to port their files to something that will remain viable for the forseeable future.
This move by Apple was about as stupid as some of the Performa computers they sold in Sears.
In July I got the 24" iMac and in August I got the new 24" iMac.
I was afraid of the new glossy screen but after using both I will be dumping the obsolete and pathetic white plastic model. The screen clarity and vibrancy of the new iMac is superior by an enormous margin. Side by side the poor last months iMac looks really sick. The new one comes with the beautiful new keyboard and I will be adding a couple of those to my Mac Pro form July and an older Mac Pro.
When showing photos, slide shows and movies side by side friends laugh at the old iMac and marvel at the new one. The difference has been enough to convince two die hard PC zealots to make the move to 24" iMacs with a safety net of Parallels of course.
Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:00 pm Subject: Re: Appleworks is essential for my business
There is no doubt that if you are heavily invested in the database module of AppleWorks, and use custom layouts etc., iWork '08 is not an adequate substitute. My contention was that such people are a small minority of AppleWorks users. But if you are in that minority, it is not yet time to toss AppleWorks. Still, it pays to start looking down the road -- as I suspect the day will come when AppleWorks will no longer even run in Mac OS X.
BTW, you can mail merge from Address Book to Pages documents.
Quotetedlandau wrote:
AppleWorks (for those of you unfamiliar with this gem) is an integrated software package, originally called ClarisWorks, that was a spectacularly successful product for Apple back in the 1990s
Thanks for the kind words, Ted, now and in the past.
QuoteIs this the version of iWork that will finally let me retire AppleWorks for good? The answer for iWork '08 is, at last: Yes.
I must admit that seems likely to be my answer now as well. About the only thing I have continued to use AppleWorks for is spreadsheet. (I don't use any MS products.) I've been eagerly awaiting Numbers.
But I do have to say that I will miss the style of integration between environments that we put into ClarisWorks. One of the ways ClarisWorks was novel was that it was one, highly integrated program, instead of several programs loosely stitched together. iWork is back to several programs, but at least they are stitched together pretty well.
Bob Hearn
ClarisWorks co-author
(P.S. How appropriate - the "Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above" word I have to enter to post is "Clarus".)
Sat Aug 25, 2007 9:03 pm Subject: Waiting impatiently
For FedEx to deliver my 24-inch iMac. Mixed emotions to the glossy screen. No windows behind me, so maybe there won't be glare.
Cheers, Neil Anderson
http://www.cyclelogicpress.com
I've been clinging to AppleWorks, too, which I use mainly for invoicing and correspondence. I only use the word processor and spreadsheet objects. I use Photoshop, Illustrator (now that FreeHand is no more!), Filemaker Pro and Acrobat Pro.
The AppleWorks embedded spreadsheet objects are great. I use imported graphics and logos. I'd always hoped that AW would import EPS files. I made a library of my signatures, with a WACOM tablet and Photoshop, for placingin electronic documents, faxes and PDFs, to clients, suppliers, etc.
So, I've got this simple, streamlined workflow that I've dreaded changing, although, it's about time to do so.
I tried version 2 of pages and it was dog-slow. Version 3 is quite nice and I've been playing with the demo quite a bit.
However... and this is a BIG one... Pages will NOT open my AppleWorks documents! This is painful. I'd have thought that Apple would have included an AppleWorks import filter with Pages, so this ommission is plain dumb. There are probably a lot of longtime AppleWorks users who would be happy to move to a modern application.
For me, right now, Pages isn't quite there yet.
Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:49 pm Subject: I still need AppleWorks
Thanks for the article. This is very good information. I have recently upgraded an older G4 tower to OS X and I'm upgrading the software. I can also no longer print out of OS9/Classic since I have a new HP networked printer, C6180.
I have many ClarisWorks 5 documents and I tried importing one to Word and it was painful. It isn't a question of whether I need a new office suite, I have MS Office 2004. It's about what will be the easiest way to allow me to access my ClarisWorks documents. AppleWorks seems to be the answer.
I called my local Apple Store and they are still selling it. So, I'm picking up a copy.
BB
PS. I got AppleWorks and have it installed on my Mac. It works great! No problem opening up my ClarisWorks documents. Maybe it's just me but I still think this is a great program.
Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:11 pm Subject: ClarisWorks "record macro" still missing
In ClarisWorks for pre-OSX Macs, you could record an action (a macro), create an icon, place that icon in the Button Bar, and Voila! tons of time saved. MS Word's implemention is clumsy, making you dig through submenus to access your macro, and Appleworks for OSX killed it.
To me that was the best feature. Plus AW was great at page layout too.
Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:10 pm Subject: Glossy screen is NOT AN ISSUE
I got a 24" iMac two weeks ago. It sits on a desk at an angle 3 feet from a large window, and under fluorescent lights. Believe me, the reflections are NOT AN ISSUE. The display is uncommonly bright, the processor is r-a-p-id, and I really would get another one in an instant if I need it here at work.
True the AW paint program is very basic but it can do one thing that I haven't found elsewhere even in some high end graphic apps.
If you have a graphic on a while background and wish to eliminate the background, do this:
Put the graphic in a paint doc, then either use the lasso and drag around the object or use the select tool (hold down the Command key) and drag around the object. The selection will automatically leave out the white space. You can then copy/paste into any doc.
I've used this trick for more than 10 years though in earlier incarnations you had to paste it first into the Scrapbook to make it a resizable image.
To me this is invaluable. I sure hope AW works with Leopard.
It's a shame that we have to resort to this...
http://www.photodon.com/lcdprotect-sheet.htm
http://www.powersupportusa.com/products/ef.php?category=ib
I'm happy that I snagged a new white 24" iMac with a matte screen for $1099 a month ago!
Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.
Recent Headlines - Updated July 5th
- Fri, 10:29 AM
- News - Apple Warns of Learning Interchange Security Breach
- 7:30 AM
- News - Happy Fourth of July!
- Thu, 6:07 PM
- TMO Scoop - Psystar Moves to Drop Bankruptcy Ahead of Apple Legal Battle
- 5:37 PM
- News - Uncomfirmed Reports Say Apple & Nvidia On The Outs
- 4:57 PM
- News - Microsoft Sick Over Barf Ad
- 4:09 PM
- Product News - KRK Ships R6 Passive Studio Monitor for Recording
- 3:45 PM
- John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 7/2) Juiced, Joost and Goosed
- 3:12 PM
- Product News - ExactScan 2 Pro Released
- 1:56 PM
- Deal Brothers - Apple TV with 160GB Hard Drive: $324.00 Delivered
- 12:46 PM
- TMO Appearances - TMO Appearances Jeff Gamet Shares iPhone Apps on MacJury
- 10:41 AM
- Product News - Art Text 2.2 Adds New Templates, Layer Options [Updated]
- 10:04 AM
- Hot Forum Topic - Deciphering Mac Sales
The Mac Observer Reader Specials
- Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
OWC: Big Drives, High Performance - Not High Prices! SATA 3.5" up to 1.5TB. Notebook up to 500GB. FW up to 6.0TB. 1.0TB Drive Models from as low as $97.99 www.MacSales.com
If you're using a Mac, then you've gotta check out Full Tilt Poker for Mac. This Full Tilt Poker bonus code does the unthinkable, it actually rewards!
RamJet Memory: MacBook and MacBook Pro 4GB kits for $57.99! Mac Pro 4GB Kits $99.99! iMac and Mac mini 4GB Kits for $57.99! 1TB SATA Hard Drives for $109.99! Click hereFor the latest Apple products use Ciao, a price comparison website, to find laptops like MacBook Air. Then find the best prices on MP3 players and use our comparison tool to evaluate mobile phones like the Apple iPhone.
Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.
