The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

DealsOnTheWeb Daily Deal: OneCall's Weekend Sale - 20 Great Items at Great Prices All Weekend Long

Pogue: New iMovie an "Utter Bafflement"

by , 10:45 AM EDT, August 17th, 2007

Apple made some great improvements with the new versions of iPhoto, iWeb, and GarageBand in iLife '08, but David Pogue of The New York Times thinks the company took a major step backwards with the latest incarnation of iMovie. According to him, the new version is an "utter bafflement."

His biggest complaint was that compared to the iMovie HD '06 it replaces, it seems like a stripped down application. "The new iMovie, for example, is probably the only video-editing program on the market with no timeline," he said.

The loss of audio effects, themes, visual effects, and the ability to export sections of movies all hamper the usability of iMovie '08, and the the lack of support for iMovie plug-ins means that many users won't be able to take advantage of add-ons they have been using for some time.

Even though Mr. Pogue was underwhelmed with the new iMovie, he did find a few things to like. "To be sure, the new version has some cool features," he said. "You can send a completed video to YouTube with one menu command; the color-correction and frame-cropping tools are unprecedented in a consumer program; and you can really, truly delete unwanted pieces of your clips, thus reclaiming hard drive space."

In the end, however, he sees the new iMovie as a weak replacement for the old one. He added "But one thing's for sure: it sure isn't iMovie."

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Let's get something straight ...

iMovie '08 is not a replacement for iMovie HD '06. The iLife '08 installation leaves iMovie HD '06 in place. (It replaces the other applications.) If David checks his Applications folder, he should find a folder, "Old iMovie," or something like that, with iMovie HD '06 intact. For those who bought iLife '08 (and those who will get it on new Macs) and who do not have iMovie HD '06, Apple has provided iMovie HD '06 free on its website.

His article also says that iMovie '08 is not any easier to use than iMovie HD '06. That's very strange coming from the author of the "Missing Manual" series. He produces a video "blog" every week or so, using iMovie HD. Most people don't have his expertise. Just watch the demo by Jobs to see how easy and fast it is.

As for the timeline, I suspect that timelines are confusing for a lot of people. (iPhoto doesn't have a timeline for slide shows, either.) It certainly was for me when I made my first video in iMovie '05. Maybe I'm just too new to computers (1984) and Macs (1992).

If one wants to edit the audio in an iMovie '08, one can drop the entire movie into a Garageband project and edit away.

Close Name:Engine Joe Posts: 412 Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Subject:

If you read the article, you'd know Pogue addresses the maintained copy of iMovie 06.

His point remains valid. iMovie 08 may be a good program for some tasks, but it is NO replacement for iMovie 06.

(and saying that the timeline is confusing for some people is disingenous at best because it implies that in previous iterations of iMovie, users had to use the timeline. You don't. It's one of two optional views)

Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject:

Quote
Engine Joe wrote:
If you read the article, you'd know Pogue addresses the maintained copy of iMovie 06.

His point remains valid. iMovie 08 may be a good program for some tasks, but it is NO replacement for iMovie 06.

(and saying that the timeline is confusing for some people is disingenous at best because it implies that in previous iterations of iMovie, users had to use the timeline. You don't. It's one of two optional views)


No, he did not mention that iMovie'06 is left intact. Here's what he wrote:

"That’s why, with what I imagine is a certain degree of sheepishness, the company is offering a free download of the previous iMovie version to anyone who has iMovie ‘08."

There's no mention that the installer leaves iMovie '06 in place. It's not an afterthought, at all. Apple is giving users options.

Good point about the optional view in iMovie '06.

In other ways, I think that Pogue may miss the point a bit. Jobs explained the genesis of iMovie '08--an Apple engineer was frustrated that it took so long to make a simple video from a vacation, so he designed something entirely new, aimed at the occasional user, not the power user who wants Final Cut Lite. It seems much easier to pick out the bits you want than in previous versions, for example, and it's apparently very fast. (I can't tell, as iMovie '08 won't run on my iMac G4. I'm not up in arms about that, however--there's no reason that it should be crippled to run on 3+-year-old Macs.)

This is not the first time that Apple has come out with a simpler product, less "capable" (in some sense) than its predecessor in the interest of simplicity and to meet the needs of a wider (and different) audience. Anyone recall the iPod Mini, Nano, and Shuffle? Ah, but, of course, those just tanked. No one ever bought one, did they? Everyone had to have the most capable iPod, after all.

Close Name:walnut Posts: 1 Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Subject:

Quote
gslusher wrote:
This is not the first time that Apple has come out with a simpler product, less "capable" (in some sense) than its predecessor in the interest of simplicity and to meet the needs of a wider (and different) audience. Anyone recall the iPod Mini, Nano, and Shuffle? Ah, but, of course, those just tanked. No one ever bought one, did they? Everyone had to have the most capable iPod, after all.


Sarcasm aside, that's really not a valid comparison. Did Apple discontinue the previous iPods and claim that the new, less-capable versions were better, and all we were going to get? Of course not; this was a choice, and the full iPod continued to be improved upon. If Apple has chosen to release the new version as "iMove Express" or something, while continuing to develop the original iMove, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject:

I have to say, even on my classmate's MacBook Pro and the one time I tried it on a G5 iMovie was dog-slow, I was kinda like "huh, I know it can do realtime effects in FCP but it can't handle this?". So if the main purpose was to reduce the number of relatively unnecessary options and increase the speed of its operation I'm all for it. Combine that with iMovie 06 being easily available and it seems a non-issue to me as well.

Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1950 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject: Not a Solution

Quote
gslusher wrote:
iMovie '08 is not a replacement for iMovie HD '06. The iLife '08 installation leaves iMovie HD '06 in place.


Right. Using an abandoned program with no future updates for new video formats or ensured-compatibility with future OSes will be lots of fun.

This is fine for a year or two, but you can't tell me you expect someone to keeping using iMvoie 06 for the next decade. This is a real brush-off answer that doesn't help anyone.

What I find odd is that the old iMovie 06 opened up in assemble mode by default. You had to manually switch it over to timeline mode. So why eliminate the timeline for simplicity? It was never there unless the user turned it on!

So why remove it? Sending more people to Final Cut Express is the only answer I find plausible.

View Name:Guest
Subject: re: gslusher
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: Not a Solution

Quote
Small White Car wrote:
Quote
gslusher wrote:
iMovie '08 is not a replacement for iMovie HD '06. The iLife '08 installation leaves iMovie HD '06 in place.


Right. Using an abandoned program with no future updates for new video formats or ensured-compatibility with future OSes will be lots of fun.

This is fine for a year or two, but you can't tell me you expect someone to keeping using iMvoie 06 for the next decade. This is a real brush-off answer that doesn't help anyone.

What I find odd is that the old iMovie 06 opened up in assemble mode by default. You had to manually switch it over to timeline mode. So why eliminate the timeline for simplicity? It was never there unless the user turned it on!

So why remove it? Sending more people to Final Cut Express is the only answer I find plausible.


Video formats: I guess that you mean the formats used by the cameras. (Internally, iMovie '06 uses only one format, DV stream.) Does iMovie '06 import from DVD or hard drive camcorders? I don't have one, so I can't tell--my newer camcorder is a Canon Optura 50, which uses mini DV tapes.

iMovie '08 apparently will import from a wider range of camcorders, including AVCHD, the format used by the newest hard-drive HD camcorders. If you want to use those clips in iMovie '06, you could import them with iMovie '08, then export them as needed.

Other formats (MPEG2, MPEG4, etc) are imported into iMovie '06 via QuickTime, so, I guess, any format that QuickTime can handle could be imported into iMovie '06. New codecs and formats would be added to QuickTime, not iMovie, just as now.

OS compatibility: who says that iMovie '06 won't be compatible with the Mac OS for quite a while? Carbon programs like AppleWorks will still run in Leopard.

Who says that Apple won't improve iMovie '08 in the future, maybe in the next year or two, building on the new baseline? (Anyone remember the first iMovie for OS 9? Compare that to iMovie '06.) Meanwhile, you have iMovie '06 for more "advanced" users. Give them time.

"The next decade"? I assume that's a bit of hyperbole. OS X isn't 10 years old. Go back 10 years and the first G3 Mac had not yet come out (that was November, 1997) and OS 8 had just been released (July, 1997). Are you still using OS 7.6.1 applications?

Default view: my copy of iMovie opens in the timeline view or the assemble view when I create a new project, depending upon what view was used when I last quit the application. I can't say what the original view was for the first project.

Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: re: gslusher

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Quote
gslusher wrote:
No, he did not mention that iMovie'06 is left intact.


Well, it *isn't* "left intact" if you don't already own iLife '06. And yes, there are millions of computers that can run iLife '08 that did not come with iLife '06.

We're all still waiting for a legitimate example of Apple (or anyone else) removing so much functionality from one version to the next.


If you have iLife '08, you can download iMovie HD '06 FREE, as stated in the Pogue article or several posts here.

Be careful, though: a lot of those "millions of computers" that didn't come with iLife '06 can't run iMovie '08, period.

"iMovie requires a Mac with an Intel processor, a Power Mac G5 (dual 2.0GHz or faster), or an iMac G5 (1.9GHz or faster). "

Jobs made it clear that iMovie '08 is a completely new application, not a "version" of the older application. It just has a similar name.

As for examples of removing functionality for simplicity, Final Cut Express, Photoshop Elements, and Microsoft Write come to mind. Each was a simplified version of another application, albeit with a different name.



Last edited by gslusher on Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Reply | Quote
Close Name:Small White Car Posts: 1950 Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Subject:

Quote
gslusher wrote:

Are you still using OS 7.6.1 applications?


Well that's pretty much my point.

Imagine someone who didn't like OS 8 for some reason. The advice you give (keep using iMovie 06) is pretty much the same as telling that person to "just keep using OS 7.6.1!"

In both cases I don't consider that advice to be very useful. Do you?

View Name:Guest
Subject:
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject:

Quote
Small White Car wrote:
Quote
gslusher wrote:

Are you still using OS 7.6.1 applications?


Well that's pretty much my point.

Imagine someone who didn't like OS 8 for some reason. The advice you give (keep using iMovie 06) is pretty much the same as telling that person to "just keep using OS 7.6.1!"

In both cases I don't consider that advice to be very useful. Do you?


Why not? If 7.6.1 did what they wanted and needed to do, they could keep using it. I still use 10.3.9 on an iMac G4. I miss out on some applications, but, so far, there's not been much real need to upgrade. I will when I get a new Mac, of course.

Close Name:Fairly Posts: 23 Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Subject: Gaffe

This is another gaffe by Apple. Spin it any way you want and it's still a gaffe. It doesn't matter how many fanboys get defensive and try to protect Steve-0 - it's a gaffe if it's not popular and this move is not popular. Whilst any company can be expected to make mistakes from time to time, this is an engineering matter and no engineer worth a tenth of his salary would ever go along with something so stupid as what Apple have done.

Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: Gaffe

Quote
Fairly wrote:
This is another gaffe by Apple. Spin it any way you want and it's still a gaffe. It doesn't matter how many fanboys get defensive and try to protect Steve-0 - it's a gaffe if it's not popular and this move is not popular. Whilst any company can be expected to make mistakes from time to time, this is an engineering matter and no engineer worth a tenth of his salary would ever go along with something so stupid as what Apple have done.


First, as Jobs said, it was an Apple engineer who came up with the idea for iMovie '08 because he was frustrated that it took so long to make a simple movie from his vacation.

Second, it's not an engineering matter. It's about meeting the needs of the customer.

We don't know how popular it will be. The gripes and complaints seem to be coming from experienced users of iMovie '06. That's a small group, I suspect. Remember that iLife '08 will come with all new Macs. Many people new to the Mac may find it quite easy to use and really like it.

When Pages came out, experienced Word users said that it was a piece of trash, never be useful for anything because it didn't do x, y, or z. New users, on the other hand, seem to like it because it's easy to use, without the steep learning curve that Word requires.

Another example would be iPhoto. iPhoto doesn't do anything that Photoshop and Bridge can't do--and Photoshop can do a lot that iPhoto can't. However, Photoshop--even Photoshop Elements--is intimidating and not easy to learn. iPhoto, on the other hand, is easy. I see the new iMovie as more like iPhoto, in that regard. It expands the number of people who will actually make videos. They should count, too.

View Name:Guest
Subject: Fairly flimsy
View Name:Guest
Subject: Are you kidding
Close Name:gslusher Posts: 2043 Joined: 13 Nov 2002
Subject: Re: Are you kidding

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
iM 08 is crap. Wait for the updates to fix it? Are you kidding? What kind of advice is that? You have no idea where this is headed, after they screwed this pooch so badly. Shame on you, Apple. Bad call.


Have you used it?

Close Name:dhp Posts: 180 Joined: 22 May 2003
Subject: re: gslusher

Quote
gslusher wrote:
Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Well, it *isn't* "left intact" if you don't already own iLife '06. And yes, there are millions of computers that can run iLife '08 that did not come with iLife '06.

We're all still waiting for a legitimate example of Apple (or anyone else) removing so much functionality from one version to the next.


If you have iLife '08, you can download iMovie HD '06 FREE, as stated in the Pogue article or several posts here.


I think you're losing track of your own argument. YOU were the one complaining that Pogue said it was available for free download, but didn't say it was "left intact" on the hard drive. He obviously knew that wouldn't apply to everyone, as I pointed out.

Quote
Be careful, though: a lot of those "millions of computers" that didn't come with iLife '06 can't run iMovie '08, period.

"iMovie requires a Mac with an Intel processor, a Power Mac G5 (dual 2.0GHz or faster), or an iMac G5 (1.9GHz or faster). "


...which doesn't do anything to change my point. Millions of systems that meet those requirements are in use.

Quote
Jobs made it clear that iMovie '08 is a completely new application, not a "version" of the older application. It just has a similar name.

Exactly, he said they are "replacing" (his exact word) iMovie, contrary to your statement above that "iMovie '08 is not a replacement for iMovie HD '06." Silly us for thinking that "iMovie '08" should be somehow more advanced and feature-rich that "iMovie '06."

Quote
As for examples of removing functionality for simplicity, Final Cut Express, Photoshop Elements, and Microsoft Write come to mind. Each was a simplified version of another application, albeit with a different name.

Each was a new product with a new name, new (lower) price, and new version number that was sold alongside the original, more advanced product. Can you imagine if they had released Final Cut Express 1.0 as "Final Cut Pro 3.0"?

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject:

Aside from whether gslusher's opinion is valid or not, were people who are upset about these changes actually happy with iMovie 06 performance? I haven't tried it yet because I don't have a good enough machine, but even on a better machine 06 was bad performance-wise. I imagine SJ found that aspect of it somewhat inconsistent with their other offerings, FCP and FCE work better even on my old G4 than iMovie ever did.

Also, as to taking a decent product and completely wrecking its UI/etc under the guise of an upgrade, this happens with software all the time. Vista is probably the most egregious example recently, and MS the worst culprit in general (was it Word 5 that was complete garbage?), but plenty of people do it. Still sucks, but Apple's hardly unique.

Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 2926 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject:

Word 6. Complete. Utter. Garbage.

Word 5 was arguably the best version of Word.

View Name:Guest
Subject: Worse...and Better...
Close Name:Mikuro Posts: 448 Joined: 15 Jun 2002
Subject: Re: Worse...and Better...

I suppose one way of looking at it is that at least they didn't try to staple these new features onto the old iMovie and wind up some some hideously bloated frankenprogram. That happens all too often.

Still, it seems odd for the successor to be inferior in such a way. If it's not meant as the true successor, it shouldn't be called iMovie. That's just going to confuse people. If it is meant as the succussor, it seems like they should've kept it under wraps a bit longer until they brought it up to par in these areas.

It sounds to me like they could have made this a separate app with iMovie integration. But then, I've never used any version of iMovie all that much, so I'm not in a good position to say.

Close Name:hughster Posts: 15 Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Subject:

Quote
Guest wrote:
blah blah blah...lots _IS_ missing from iMovie 08...Didn't Steve say it was "all new, tossed out the old one and started again" ... ( like it was sooooo stable...)

I expect we'll see the return of the timeline in future releases. And more transitions and effects. I believe the original iMovie had no timeline as well...Don't blast me too hard if I am wrong.

Still ambivalent, though, I must say...


You may well be right on the upgrade features. I missed the timeline until I found that it was there in 06 where it had been stored safely. On the other hand, I made an iMovie slideshow in a fraction of the time it took me to do in previous versions. I do miss not being able to cut to the beat when I have a musical soundtrack in mind, though.

Close Name:DaiMac Posts: 952 Joined: 29 Jun 2001
Subject:

Quote
Intruder wrote:
Word 6. Complete. Utter. Garbage.

Word 5 was arguably the best version of Word.


Yeah, thats right, couldn't remember if it was 6 or 5. Remember Word and Excel 5 being like 22 discs or something between them, but once you got them installed it was good

View Name:Guest
Subject:
Close Name:sleepygeek -   TMO Forum Mod Posts: 4550 Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Subject: Relax

Apple currently ships four applications that cover the same basic requirement: iMovie 08 & 06, Final Cut Pro & Express. iMovie '06 now comes free with '08. The time to criticise is when iMovie '06 disappears with no balancing updates to shipping applications, not when Apple introduces an innovative iMovie '08, that does new things that weren't possible before.

View Name:Guest
Subject: iMovie6 vs. iMovie8
View Name:Guest
Subject: imovie
View Name:Guest
Subject: imovie
Close Name:Intruder -   TMO Mac Specialist Posts: 2926 Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Subject: Re: imovie

Quote
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, I have and the employees in the store even recommended that I not get the mac if I want good editing software.


yeah, right.

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.
Log in | Register | Having Problems? Reset TMO Cookies & Try Again
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit   

You are not logged in, and this post will appear as "Guest." Log in with your username and password from the TMO forums. If you do not have a username, you can register here.
Please note that guests are limited to including a maximum of two URLs per post.


Post A Comment
  Subject


  Your Comments



Please enter the word exactly as you see it in the image above. Registered users aren't prompted for this. Having trouble reading the image get a new one.


Recent Headlines - Updated Friday, July 4th, 2008

Fri., 7:30 AM
Happy Fourth of July!
Thu., 4:50 PM
Apple Slashes $400 from SSD Drive in MacBook Air
4:05 PM
It's Official - Firefox Sets Guinness Record for Downloads
3:30 PM
Apple Files Patent for a Multi-touch Gesture Language
2:20 PM
Editorial - Mac's Market Share and the Cascade Failure of Windows
1:35 PM
iPodObserver - Apple Slurps Up Samsung's NAND Flash for iPhone 3G
1:05 PM
WSJ: Tips for Switching from Windows to Mac
12:05 PM
iPodObserver - Google Intros Google Talk for iPhone
11:35 AM
iPO Just a Thought - iPod nano Versus iPhone: Decisons, Decisions...
10:55 AM
YouTube Ordered to Turn Over All User Records to Viacom
10:10 AM
Hot Forum Topic - Apple vs. Cell Carriers: Who's Winning the Game
9:25 AM
iPodObserver - Rumor: Best Buy, Radio Shack to Sell iPhone 3G
8:45 AM
.Mac Bookmark Sync Deadline Extended to July 6
8:10 AM
Adobe Reader 9 Hits the Streets
 

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • Download Typestyler, still the Ultimate Styling Tool for Internet, Print and Video Graphics. Works great in Classic with a Native OS X Version on the way. Free Tryout: www.typestyler.com
  • OWC: Burn DVDs, DVD-DL, CDs, DVD-Ram - FAST! Superdrive upgrades from OWC starting from $31.99 with options for nearly every Mac. Models with Lightscribe, Blu-Ray too!
  • MacBook/MacBook Pro / MacMini / iMac Intel Core2 DUO DDR2 667Mhz 4GB Kit $84, 3GB Kit $60, 2GB Kit $40 1GB $20. Click to Maximize your Macs...
  • Mac observers can now play Party Poker for Mac as well as Mac casino games by going to MacPokerOnline.com.
  • RamJet Memory: MacBook 1Gig $39, 2Gig $78, 4Gig $195! Mac Pro 2Gig $115, 4Gig $189! 500G Seagate SATA II $139! Click here
  • For the latest Apple products use Ciao a comparison website to find laptops like MacBook Air. Then find the best prices on MP3 players and use our comparison tool to evaluate cell phones.

  • Laptop Hardware Provided by TechRestore - Overnight Mac & iPod Repairs.
  • Special Report: WWDC 2008
  • Special Report: iPhone
  • __________
  • Help TMO Grow
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!
  • New Media Expo 2008

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $170.12. Change Today: +1.94.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics