Nice tip!

Spotlight is the worst-implemented feature in Tiger. This article points that out:

Quote

Except that Spotlight can't find the file, even though it's found it before...

.
Since when did end users have to fix their search tool? Isn't that the FINDER's job? Why should end users have to know that a spotlight database even exists?
It is absolutely insane that over a year after Tiger is released, Spotlight is still severely broken. Each update to 10.4 that has come out, I have hoped that it is fixed. Nope. There is not even a utility to fix it (like some third party utilities that are available). I manage about 150 mac users. This has held back rolling out Tiger because our users will no longer be able to reliably search for a file.

Good tip, but it is an absolute shame that it is needed.

Oh yeah, If you're not afraid of the command line...You can use mdutil in terminal to rebuild your database as well. There is a man page to learn the switches.

As with 'any' program, spotlight 'can' be corrupted, but it's not normally the case..

To say that you're not upgrading your 150 users to Tiger simply because there's no reliable way to find files is just plain dumb, and sounds more like an excuse.. Heck, you probably shouldn't even have your files on a computer, since there's no assurance that the hard drive isn't going to crash.

Not to be name calling, but you're simply missing out on a LOT of great feaures, plus speed boosts that Tiger has over Panther.

Be that as it may, the simple fact is that Spotlight is a proc hog, and is less efficient than the good ol' "find" function which it replaced. I've killed Spotlight all together on my system, which has reduced processor load, decreased the heat output of my Powerbook (and it was 101F today, so that's key), as well as extending the battery life.

If I really need to find something, I use Quicksilver.

Quote

spliceguys wrote:
As with 'any' program, spotlight 'can' be corrupted, but it's not normally the case..
To say that you're not upgrading your 150 users to Tiger simply because there's no reliable way to find files is just plain dumb, and sounds more like an excuse.. Heck, you probably shouldn't even have your files on a computer, since there's no assurance that the hard drive isn't going to crash .

Well, part of our workflow happens to have some people search for files that have been created in the past to make sure we don't have to do any re-shoots. (Yes, there is a database as well, but it isn't always updated as it should be.) We need absolutely accurate file searching, or we'll be spending money re-shooting products that are already done.
As for the files... they are on a server in the first place. And spotlight is very inconsistent in that manner.
If we could just have our old search back as an option...

Use the mdutil command-line executable to flush the spotlight caches, and force them to be rebuilt.

http://www.hmug.org/man/1/mdutil.php

Mmm... Quicksilver. Findy goodness.

But I use Spotlight a lot. No problem here. Tiger. Leopard. Sweet. What's the beef?

Quote

brett_x wrote:
Well, part of our workflow happens to have some people search for files that have been created in the past to make sure we don't have to do any re-shoots. (Yes, there is a database as well, but it isn't always updated as it should be.) We need absolutely accurate file searching, or we'll be spending money re-shooting products that are already done.
As for the files... they are on a server in the first place. And spotlight is very inconsistent in that manner.
If we could just have our old search back as an option...

Well, one wonders a couple of things on hearing that.

1. Why is your database not being used to create new jobs? If it were, then creators, dates and critical keywords could be used as part of each file creation, which in turn would throw up flags for files of a similar type, thereby killing two birds with one stone, right?

2. I'm assuming you're non-profit. A commercial operation surely would have no objections to being asked, and paid, to do a job twice.

Both I and a colleague have identical macbook pro's and both of us realized at the same time that our spotlight searches were not working at all. I'll bet that there are many users out there that have this problem and don't realize it. I am sure that it has been a couple of months at least that I have had the problem and was completely oblivious to it. But my searches were not working...

I don't think this is within the tolerances of normal functioning of a feature as important as this.

Sean