How does iTunes 7 handle existing joined tracks already in your library? I did not see anything about this on the iTunes web page.

If after you choose compilation and your tracks still show up as separate albums, do a get info on all the tracks again and check the box for Album Artist and say ok, it will clear out that tag and your songs will be in one album. It may not happen to you but it did to me and I spent 10 minutes scratching my head.

Joined tracks are handled as one track, just as in iTunes 6.

The "gapless" property in the info dialog doesn't seem to actually change the way the songs are played back. They will play back without gaps if they're supposed to. It just works. So I guess that assigning albums as "gapless" is just for your own reference.

Quote

Tinky Winky wrote:
Joined tracks are handled as one track, just as in iTunes 6.

The "gapless" property in the info dialog doesn't seem to actually change the way the songs are played back. They will play back without gaps if they're supposed to. It just works. So I guess that assigning albums as "gapless" is just for your own reference.

Sure seems that way.

On CDs whose tracks intended to be separate, the sound usually fades a bit at the end of a track. Thus, the VERY short gap in iTunes 6, etc., is not very noticeable. It IS noticeable, rather like a hiccup, in albums intended to be continuous.

For example, Jane Olivor's Safe Return was recorded at a concert. The track separations don't come at the end of a song, but at the beginning of the next. Her introduction to the next song is at the end of the previous track and the applause and audience sounds are continuous. I tried it in iTunes 6 on my PowerBook and the (short) gaps were obvious. I tried it in iTunes 7 with and without the properties setting and got true gapless playback in both cases. It sounds like a live concert, just like the CD. I found the same thing with other concert albums, including comedy concerts. OTOH, some concert CDS, like Nana Mouskouri's Concert for Peace, were produced with gaps--the last 2 seconds or so of each track is silent. Gapless playback won't make any difference in those cases.

No overlap is one difference...
I always have my songs fade from one to the next. In 99% of my music, this works fine. They overlap each other just a bit. But when it comes to songs that are supposed to flow together, it doesn't sound right.
Now, why a whole album?
I just wish there was a way to tag 2 songs as gapless, instead of the "whole album" approach. There are many songs that flow into the next song on an album without being an entirely gapless album. Flaming Lips' "The Soft Bulletin" for example, tracks 6 and 7 should be gapless, but the rest of the album is not.
Maybe I'm wrong and there is a way to do this, but I haven't figured it out yet. I'll wait for iTunes 7.0.1 I guess.

Edit: You can tag individual tracks as gapless if you want... just don't select all of the songs before "editing multiple songs". The info still says "Part of a gapless album", but the other songs remain not "part of a gapless album". Apple is usually clearer on this type of thing. But at least I have the feature I was hoping for.

Seriously? I thought this was totally clear. Songs play gapless. It just works. If they're not meant to flow together, iTunes isn't going to force them to be slammed up against one another. I don't see how this is so difficult to understand. The "gapless" tag is there for your reference only, it does not affect how the songs are played back.

According to the iTunes 7 documentation, the "Part of a gapless album" setting *does* matter. Check it out:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304362

So, the option is only used if you turn on the general "Crossfading" option in iTunes.

Glenn

It appears from your screenshot that your sorting on the column "Artist". You could've fixed it to display the album together by just sorting on the "Album" column.

Actually the 'gapless album' tag is not there for your reference only. Its for for people who listen to house mix albums and it stops the split second pause between tracks (usually at the high point of a mix). Take my word for it - its a great feature and really works.

Quote

Differs2 wrote:
Actually the 'gapless album' tag is not there for your reference only. Its for for people who listen to house mix albums and it stops the split second pause between tracks (usually at the high point of a mix). Take my word for it - its a great feature and really works.

Don't be so narrow-minded. Gapless playback is "for" a lot of people. It helps with any CD that was divided into tracks after the fact--recordings of live concerts, comedy routines, some classical music, etc. The CDs play continuously, but the tracks get separated when iTunes rips the CD. Thanks for expanding my knowledge, though. I had heard the term "house mix" before, but didn't know what it meant. I haven't been to a dance club in about 30 years, harkening back to the days of <gag> disco!

so gapless is great, but itunes doesnt know where the song starts/ends it appears..has always annoyed me especially with DSOTM.

like most of "on the run" is labled as "breathe"

anyway to fix that problem? anyone else have it?

V helpful article