NY Times Looks At Apple's Backwards Marketing Strategy

Hereis a story that takes a different tack; John Markoff, of the New York Times, has posted an interesting article that examines Appleis marketing strategy, which, along with everything else Apple does, seems to fly in the face of convention. Apple gives away (or nearly so) software to get people to buy hardware. Mr. Markoff says thatis a bass-ackwards marketing strategy that somehow seems to work for Apple. And if Apple can do it...

Hereis and excerpt from the article, Can Hardware Rise Above Software?:

Common Silicon Valley wisdom has hewed for decades to the business adage that to establish a successful business in consumer products, you must be willing to lose money on the razors and look for profits from selling the blades. A notable example has been Microsoftis money-losing Xbox video game business. By hemorrhaging money on each video game console (razor) sold and hoping someday to make it up on game software (razor blades), Microsoftis home and entertainment division reported losses of almost $1 billion last year.

Now, along comes Mr. Jobs, the chief executive of Apple Computer, who once again is standing the common wisdom on its head. For its fiscal first quarter of 2004, Apple sold nearly 750,000 of its palm-sized iPod digital music players (razors) for an average price of $400, while selling 30 million songs (blades) for about 99 cents each. While Mr. Jobs has repeatedly said that Apple makes little or no profit from each song downloaded, the company said last week that its iPod sales were crucial to Appleis financial resurgence.

The article is an interesting look at Appleis marketing strategy. Stop by the New York Times for the full article.