W alt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal has a new column for that paper dealing with the "Switch" question. Sparked by Appleis own "Switch" ad campaign, as well as increased reader mail from Mr. Mossbergis own readers concerning the issue, Mr. Mossberg is offering a rational look at which Windows users can easily make the Switch. From the article"
Most home Windows users tempted to switch to a Mac could do so without losing anything, and might well gain. Macintosh computers are the best-designed computers on the market, and handle every common computing task as well as, or better than, a Windows PC.
I donit say that lightly. In 1997, before Mr. Jobs took over the company again, I was so disillusioned with Apple and its products that I wrote a column advising consumers to shun the Mac. Today, Apple and the Mac are far better.
Switching to the Mac might make sense if youire tired of Windows or Microsoft; if you spend much of your time working with digital photos, videos or music; or if you just love the look and feel of the Mac hardware and software. It might appeal if you prefer a carefully designed machine over a commodity box, or tight integration between software and hardware instead of a generic operating system crammed into a generic PC.
Switching probably doesnit make sense if your computing needs fall into certain categories, such as remote access to Windows corporate networks or heavy game playing.
He also lists some pros and cons for each platform (comparing a G4 iMac to a system from Dell). The cons for Windows seem particularly to the point:
- Weaker software/hardware integration
- Boring, me-too design
- Inferior software for photos, video editing, DVDs
- Rampant virus and security problems
- Microsoft "activation" requirements
Check out the full article for a lot more information; itis a very good read.