Barclays: Apple Is So Big…

| Apple Stock Watch

AppleApple is so big, the company’s influence should be dictating your tech investment strategy, according to Barclays analyst Ben Reitzes, and what Apple doesn’t have, Samsung does. In a research note to clients obtained by The Mac Observer, the analyst outlined a three column investment strategy for investing with companies aligned with either Apple or Samsung, or at least steering clear of companies that aren’t “Apple-safe.”

Size Matters

Barclays is currently forecasting revenues of US$200 billion for Apple by 2013, which, he wrote, defies the “Law of Large Numbers.” This is a reference to the idea that Apple has already grown so large, some have said that the company can not maintain its rate of growth.

Mr. Reitzes’s point is that while that will eventually be true, it’s not true yet, and Apple still has years of growth with just its current product lines.

Samsung is also a giant in the industry, with projected revenues of $196 billion in 2013, just behind Apple. That includes the sale of some 446 million handsets, including both feature phones and smartphones.

Especially with Apple

“Let’s put the Apple figures alone in perspective,” Mr. Reitzes wrote. “Apple just reported revenues of more than $46 billion in C4Q11. Within three years, it is plausible that Apple could have an $80 billion revenue quarter.”

That’s a lot of money, but as in all things, context is king. To wit:

“This type of revenue in one quarter is about the size of both the enterprise server and storage market combined – for an entire year.”

Long time Apple observers will clearly remember days in which it was lamented frequently and loudly that Apple didn’t play well in Enterprise, and that the company wasn’t competitive in that market. While that has been changing with iPhone and iPad, Mr. Reitzes points out that Apple could see more revenue in a single quarter than the entire Enterprise server and storage markets bring in all year.

Furthermore, Barclays believes that Apple’s Americas division alone could have sales $56.6 billion, a number that represents about 40 percent of the estimated consumer electronics sales in the U.S. That’s a bit of an apples-to-oranges comparison, but it does serve to put Apple’s growth in perspective.

Tech Investing

With all that talk talk of Apple’s massive size, Barclays is telling clients that they need to take Apple into consideration when investing in tech. On the one hand, there’s the idea of investing in companies that are in some way aligned with Apple, either through its supply chain or as partners. On the other, investors need to be wary of companies ripe for Apple disruption. The third option is to pay attention to companies aligned with Samsung.

“Our point is simple: Apple’s share of tech revenue and profits, when combined with Samsung’s, is so large globally that those who are allied with them can still win – and those that are not (either in the supply chain or because of a technology disruption like printing) could face some serious challenges,” the analyst wrote.

He added, “We do not believe that consumers or corporations will see spending capabilities expand enough over the next five years to allow categories like PCs and printers, for example, to grow significantly. The share of wallet for smart mobility is too high to allow other categories to grow at historical rates (consider that smartphones are subsidized, but come with higher monthly fees that total more than $1,000 per year for many users).”

Three Columns

Below is Barclays’s first column, companies with “Overweight” ratings that are aligned with Apple.

Barclays First Column

Next we have Barclays’s second column of companies with an “Overweight” rating that are aligned with Samsung.

Barclays Second Column

The third column is even more interesting to us, mostly because it includes a few names that were, once upon a time, considered Apple’s nemeses. These companies are all rated “Underweight,” and are named as companies that are “challenged by Apple and Samsung.”

“Given the rise of Apple and its share of market cap and industry profits, it is important to also invest in what we call ‘Apple-safe’ companies,” Mr. Reitzes wrote. “This third column of tech includes cloud and Big Data themes and other enterprise-related tech trends that Apple cannot really disrupt. However, we don’t include enterprise PCs, which we believe are disrupted by the consumerization of IT, where Apple leads.”

Barclays Third Column

Today’s note was released after the closing bell.

Shares in Apple gave up some of Monday’s gains, ending the day at $556.97, down $4.31 (-0.77 percent), on strong volume of 24.8 million shares trading hands.

*In the interest of full disclosure, the author holds a tiny, almost insignificant share in AAPL stock that was not an influence in the creation of this article.

Sign Up for the Newsletter

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday.

Comments

wab95

These figures speak volumes about Apple’s impact and functional presence in the industry; and more effectively than verbal rebuttal, throw into unflattering relief the claims of Apple’s doomsayers, however stentorian and insistent, on the one hand, and explain Apple’s continued and unrelenting momentum in the consumer and enterprise spaces, on the other. 

By any meaningful metric, Apple has emerged as a cross-industrial superpower in the second decade of the 21st Century. Worrisome for its competition is the emerging consensus amongst analysts that there is ample opportunity, thanks particularly to emerging markets, for continued growth and dominance for years to come.

MIke

I think Apple is working on a car and if this is true, the earth will crack in two. It will be the first car revolution since Henry Ford did the first one. Other cars will burn in flames never to be seen again. It will be before and after, as everything Apple does. Jony Ive said this week he is working on the most important work of his life. So, watch this carefully. It is a car my friends!

Lee Dronick

It will be the first car revolution since Henry Ford did the first one.

Henry Ford did not invent the first automobile.

cb50dc

?This type of revenue in one quarter is about the size of both the enterprise server and storage market combined ? for an entire year.?

I gotta admit, I’m starting to get a little worried about Apple’s sheer magnitude. I keep thinking that some day soon we’ll find a little news item about something Apple’s cooking up called “iSkynet.”

(Yeah, I know we’re already overdue for it.)

mrhooks

Henry Ford did not invent the first automobile.

I don’t see where he said that.  Ford’s Model T may not have been the first automobile, but it is considered to be the first revolution in the auto industry, due to its influence on all other automobiles of the time, and for making autos popular among the masses.

I don’t think inventing something (e.g., the first auto) counts as revolutionizing it anyway, since how does one revolutionize something that doesn’t yet exist?  Revolutionized transportation, yes, but not automobiles.

Lee Dronick

I don?t see where he said that.

Yeah, maybe not.

Log-in to comment