HP Reportedly Bails on Windows RT to Focus on Android Tablets

| News

HP has reportedly bailed on Windows RT as a tablet OS, leaving the company . Citing unnamed sources, SemiAccurate reported that HP is making the move in the wake of Microsoft launching its own Surface tablets.

Kicking Windows RT

Artist’s Rendition

Windows RT is the flavor of Windows 8 designed for tablets with ARM processors, while Windows 8 Pro is designed to work on both desktop PCs and Intel-based touch tablet/toaster-fridges. Microsoft announced two Surface tablets on June 18th, one for Windows RT and one for Windows 8 Pro.

While there remain more unknowns than there are knowns about the new devices, it would appear that “angry partners” can be added to the knowns column. If SemiAccurate is…well…accurate, it would appear that HP would rather work with Google on Android tablets than Microsoft on Windows RT tablets, even though Google also introduced its own tablet, the Nexus 7.

The site said that other unspecified OEMs are also frustrated with Microsoft, though we should note that one of the bigger OEMs, Acer, has publicly said that Microsoft doesn’t really intend to make its own tablets. Of course, that same Acer exec also predicted the iPad would be a flash in the pan, so keep a big bag of salt on hand when listening to his pronouncements.

In any event, Microsoft’s Surface puts its OEMs in an interesting position. The company is asking those OEMs to pay a licensing fee to make Windows RT-compatible devices and then compete with Microsoft on price, even though Microsoft isn’t directly paying the same licensing fee. If anything, its OEMs are subsidizing the development of the OS while Microsoft reaps the rewards.

A more cynical reading of this rumor might find that HP is dumping Windows RT because it has lost faith in the platform. While no one has been able to truly compete with Apple’s iPad (the Nexus 7 might be the first contender), Google’s Android has at least been able to move a few units. That’s something Microsoft can’t claim.

Whatever the case, if Microsoft was fancying going the whole widget route for Windows RT, the company may find that its OEMs help it along that path.

Comments

Paul Goodwin

Hmmm. That’s kind of a big kick too. Sounds like they are not very happy with MS and believe Android based products are the only path for tablets other than Apple’s. It’ll sure be interesting to see how all of the non-Apple tablet stuff unfolds.

John Dingler, artist

Everyone in that other OS camp seems to be expressing frustration toward each other: MS with OEMs for their inability to make a decent-selling tablet to combat the iPad, and OEMs with MS for showing them up by outrageously releasing a so-called “tablet,” the Surface.

Also, as long as MS keeps the bifurcated approach to its tablet OS, Apple’s singular iPad/iOS approach remains a winning proposition to those who favor the iPad.

gslusher

by outrageously releasing a so-called ?tablet,? the Surface.

A minor correction: Microsoft didn’t “release” anything. They “announced” the Surface, but gave no pricing information nor a release date. They didn’t let even anyone really check it out, especially the keyboard. (DId any of the demos really use the keyboard?) When Apple announced the iPad, several columnists got to play with it for an hour or more. The same held for the original iPhone. However, at least Microsoft did let people touch a Surface tablet, unlike RIM, which wouldn’t let anyone near the demo Playbook when it was announced.

From the demo, it would appear that it would be a good idea to have a backup Surface readily available. (N.B. Steve Jobs had a few failures in demos, as well. On one occasion—I think it was when the “clicker” stopped working, so he couldn’t go to the next slide, Jobs told the story about Woz’s TV disrupter. If you can find it on YouTube, it’s worth watching.)

Log-in to comment