UK Judges Not Happy With Apple’s Compliance on Court Order

| News

Three UK judges are not pleased with Apple's shenanigans in complying with court orders to publicly acknowledge that Samsung did not copy Apple's iPad. Stalling, delays, "false and misleading" additions to the statement, and website design tricks have gotten the British judges a little hot under the collar.

Apple and Samsung logos in the scales of justice

Back on July 18th, UK Judge Colin Briss ruled that Apple must display an acknowledgement on its website that said that Samsung had not copied Apple. At the same time, he acknowledged that one of the reasons it was clear they didn't is because Samsung's devices were not at "cool" as Apple's.

Of course, Apple appealed the decision, but it lost, and the appeals process was just a temporary delay. The acknowledgement would have to appear on its website and in several papers in October.

So Apple put up a statement on its UK website that made the acknowledgement, but also included some of the judge's own words regarding the cool factor. The judge was not amused. He considered it a "plain breach of the order" and gave Apple 24 hours to change it.

Apple made the required changes in wording, but apparently adding a bit of Javascript trickery that would keep the statement "below the fold" when displayed in a browser.

The Javascript code has now been removed and the acknowledgement, along with a link to the statement, can now be found at the bottom of Apple's UK home page.

Apple's UK website acknowledgement

Now appearing on Apple's UK website

The Guardian reported that the judges are furious with Apple's stall tactics. In addition to the acknowledgment, they hit Apple with additional costs "as a mark of the court's disapproval of a party's conduct, particularly in relation to its respect for an order of the court."

In the end, the Sir Robin Jacob summarized the events, "I hope that the lack of integrity involved in this incident is entirely atypical of Apple."

Sign Up for the Newsletter

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday.

Comments

deejaykaye

Losing that case was outrageous, Samsung is so obviously ripping off Apple’s IP just because it’s “not as cool” doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Having to publish that “acknowledgement” is pouring “salt in the wounds” so Apple’s reluctance isn’t surprising. I find it to be a repugnant, reprehensible action of judge to enforce such a childish requirement.

daemon

“I find it to be a repugnant, reprehensible action of judge to enforce such a childish requirement.”

Wow, that’s exactly the opposite of what the judges’ order was.

Lee Dronick

Maybe they wouldn’t be hot under the collar if they were not wearing those wigs smile

Seriously if they don’t like what Apple did then they need to be specific in telling them what to say.

RonMacGuy

“Wow, that’s exactly the opposite of what the judges’ order was.”

Wow, kind of like Samsung not paying Apple the billion dollars that they owe.”

macfehr

The judges should have let their original decision do the talking. Since when does a court ask a company to apologize for losing their case?

David

I don’t think Apple need worry. After all uk judges seem content to let terrorists escape deportation as in the case today with the Muslim cleric Abu Quatada and even when the guy came illegally to the UK in the first place. Just goes to show how out of touch UK judges are…

Log-in to comment