Recent Comments

RE: Comparing Apple's iPhone Upgrade Program with AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile

@Brian Renshaw — I'm breaking my rule of not immediately replying to comments because I think yours may be factually incorrect. I'll get with AT&T to comment officially, but my experience does not match your presumption here. AT&T's discount is for phones on their Next plan as well as out-of-contract (i.e. customer-owned) phones. I have some of each on our Family Share plan and that discount is applied to all of them.

RE: Comparing Apple's iPhone Upgrade Program with AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile

@Lee, Apple's iPhone Upgrade Program website says, "Launching at U.S. Apple Retail Stores. You can make a reservation online, starting at 12:01 a.m. PDT on September 12, to buy in store."

RE: Comparing Apple's iPhone Upgrade Program with AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile

@MaxHedrm: you're absolutely right. I put together these numbers looking at incident cost ($79/$99), not plan cost ($99/$129). Article updated. Thanks!

RE: Skype for Mac Update Ignores Its Own Audio Settings

Thanks, @Ecamm Network! Article updated.

RE: How to Test the Speed of Your Home Network with Iperf

@David I think you missed a step. You need to install Homebrew first, with the "ruby" command on the first page.

RE: How to Test the Speed of Your Home Network with Iperf

Thanks, @freejak - Indeed, HomeBrew requires Xcode. Usually OS X will prompt you for that if you need it when installing, but... that's not always the case. Thanks, @freejack.

RE: Digital Music: Can You Hear Above 16-bit/44.1kHz?

And now, as for your tests... again I go back to the body of work that's been done. I don't mean to continually punt on this point, but the scientific consensus is that when the sampling/conversion is done properly, there is no audible difference (and the filtering and aliasing is a HUGE part of getting that right... and it's not easy). Given that you quickly found audible differences and were able to train others to hear the same, I have to assume it's in the sampling process simply based upon what all the other studies have found. Again, referring to…

RE: Digital Music: Can You Hear Above 16-bit/44.1kHz?

Thanks for this, James. Good stuff, man. wink Responding in-kind, just to keep the trail here. Regarding the post two up from this, that's an interesting article. Dangerous reading for the casual reader, though, because this Tim Wescott gets far too close to *appearing* to make the argument for "stair-stepping" in digital sampling, something I think everyone knows is false, including the author (he basically says so). But he describes and diagrams it nonetheless. Was this thing peer-reviewed? If so, I blame his peers for letting him get away with this, too. wink Regardless, his final conclusion is right on…

RE: Digital Music: Can You Hear Above 16-bit/44.1kHz?

@James Campbell thanks for this. I don't usually use the comments to go tit-for-tat immediately, but since this is such a fundamental part of understanding the math here, I felt I should either respond or remove your comment pending further research. I hate removing comments, so... here we are. wink The sampling theorem is just that: a theorem. Proven (in this case, by many). And, in part, the Wikipedia article you asked us to reference says, "The sampling theorem introduces the concept of a sample-rate that is sufficient for perfect fidelity for the class of bandlimited functions; no actual 'information'…

RE: Digital Music: Can You Hear Above 16-bit/44.1kHz?

Playing some catch-up here. @macHobs - I understand your philosophical concern! I want it to be "better," too, and when I started down this path I was hopeful that it would be possible. Seems we developed the technology to placate our ears before we caught up with our eyes. @Paul Boutin - Sorry iTunes' process is mucking with your good work, sir. I'm definitely not an expert on this, but from my research I recall reading that Apple actually wants you to submit at 24-bit so THEY can do the full conversion. Perhaps that's part of your issue? @richardcon -…