Recent Comments

RE: Apple's iPhone 6 Plus: A Perfectly-Sized Portable Device

Good article; I wouldn't expect less. smile I see an interesting dichotomy emerging between iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus proponents. Many iPhone 6 Plus users (including you, Dan Frakes, Bob LeVitus and others whose articles I have read) cite the Plus advantage that it almost eliminates their need to use their iPad mini anymore. I totally get that and I agree that it's a good reason to prefer the 6 Plus. But it doesn't fit for people like me. First, I use an iPad Air rather than an iPad mini. I prefer the larger size. There is no way…

RE: iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6 Plus: Dr. Mac's Final Showdown

RE: "Moving right along, that the iPhone 6 Plus can take the place of my iPad mini for travel was merely a bonus. The real reasons I selected it over the iPhone 6 are its camera and battery, which are both the best every in any iPhone." Your article, as represented by the quote above, makes no mention of any trade-offs with getting a 6 Plus, namely due to its larger size. The 6 Plus has a better camera and a better battery life, so get it if those things matter to you. That seems to be the beginning and…

RE: Apple iPhone 6 Plus - the Word That Shall Not be Spoken: Phablet

Apple did not "copy" Samsung by coming out with a 5.5" iPhone. Yes, Samsung had a phablet first. Apple is second (or whatever place). Apple is a follower, no doubt, but not a copier here. You don't "copy" a size. One milk company was the first to sell milk in half-gallon containers. Now they all do. Does that make all other milk companies copiers? No. One television company was the first to make a 60 inch television. Now they all do. Does that make all other television companies copiers? No. It's just a size. No one company has any propriety…

RE: Apple iPhone 6 Plus - the Word That Shall Not be Spoken: Phablet

It's a bit of cognitive dissonance, rationalization, whatever. When 4.0 in. was the biggest iPhone you could buy, we tended to argue why we didn't want or need a larger phone and why phablets were too large, ugly and unwieldy. Now that the iPhone 6 Plus is here (and especially given how well Apple designed it), suddenly bigger is better. Especially among those who must have the biggest and the best. But also for those who see a Plus as a possible way of not also carting around an iPad. Making phone calls is now one of the least frequent…

RE: Moshi's Cases & Covers Are...Super!

I suppose it should go without saying, but I'll say it anyway: Other than what I get paid to write an article, no money is involved in what I write. Companies do sometimes offer to give me a review unit (as was the situation here). Except for small inexpensive items, I return the product when I'm done. I only occasionally meet with companies regarding their products. It's far from the main source of what I write about. When I do, it's more likely that i will either never write an article about the product (because I think it is so…

RE: Multitasking & the iPad

As a result of reading the comments here, I realize there is another significant constraint on Apple' decision to move to a multitasking iPad: Apple expects to developers to design an app to perfectly fit the dimensions of the display. In a true multitasking environment, users should be able to resize an app's "window" to take up a selected fraction of the screen. This will almost certainly present difficulties for app designs. It's not an insurmountable obstacle. But it is worth noting.

RE: Multitasking & the iPad

Bosco: Thanks for the compliment. And your suggestion to ask for a review unit of Galaxy products certainly has merit. I'm going to investigate. Regardless, I will still likely stay within the fence. This is the MAC Observer after all. And my interests follow suit.

RE: Mac App Store's Sandbox Loophole

One more point... When a customer buys an app at the Mac App Store, part of his thinking may be that he is glad to be getting the security protection that the Store promises. If the customer then has to go outside the Store to get a fully functional version of the product, he is losing that protection. If the customer knew this was how things were going to work before purchasing the product, he might have decided not to buy it. That's why, once again, if a developer does not make all of this clear in advance of a…

RE: Mac App Store's Sandbox Loophole

James: I don't see how running on UNIX precludes requiring sandboxing. The iPhone runs on a UNIX system and it is completely sandboxed. As for Adobe and Microsoft (and Apple itself for that matter), Apple can always make a few exceptions for the big guys. At least during a period of transition. Finally, while I believe Apple is most likely headed in this general direction, I am certainly not 100% confident of how far Apple will go down this road. And, although less likely in my view, the other two possibilities remain. iJack: By referring to "honest' developers, I may…

RE: Mac App Store's Sandbox Loophole

iJack: I think you've missed the subtext of what I wrote. I don't mind that sandboxing gets circumvented. I am actually happy about it. My major point was that if Apple wants to have rules, they should enforce them. If the rule is stupid, they should abandon the rule, not fail to enforce it. Even worse, inconsistently enforcing a rule causes greater problems for developers, especially the honest ones. The honest ones play by the rules while they watch those with less integrity get away with breaking them. In this regard, I object to developers who claim that their program…