<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">The Mac Observer Forums</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/atom/" />
    <updated></updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2010</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.6.8">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:03:16</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Defining The Apple iPad&#8217;s Market</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78263/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78263</id>
      <published>2010-03-14T13:21:33Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>DawnTreader</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>I&#8217;ve been reading comments around the Web about the Apple iPad in response to reports of robust pre-order activity. It&#8217;s clear this is a misunderstood product. I posted my views on defining the Apple iPad&#8217;s market at <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twilightjunction.blogspot.com%2F">Eventide</a>. </p>

<p>The blog post started as a response to comments about <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fbrainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com%2F2010%2F03%2F13%2Fday-1-estimate-120000-ipads-sold%2F">PED&#8217;s column on early iPad sales</a>. But when my intended post became lengthier than his original column, I chose to post it on my blog instead.</p>

<p>The iPad isn&#8217;t intended to compete with laptops, it&#8217;s intended to compete economically with netbooks.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Rant. ~ Why Google is THE BEST FRIEND &#123; as an enemy &#125; That Apple Has Had for Years!</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78269/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78269</id>
      <published>2010-03-16T11:37:53Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>TanToday</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>OK, I believe I was the first here to start mumbling about Google&#8217;s Schmidt being a mole inside of Apple via his board seat, and did that over a year ago.</p>

<p>He is your typical arrogant liberal &#123; unlike Jobs, who is an ATYPICAL arrogant liberal &#125; and like Bill Gates so long ago, was invited into the Cupertino Cafe to &#8220;get involved&#8221; in the planning and future, AS A BOARD MEMBER. What he did, was glean the ideas, run home to GOOG and tell the eggheads there, &#8220;Boys, WE GOTTA GET IN THAT GAME, they have some GREAT IDEAS!&#8221; Leading of course, to Google developing CHROME, a rival operating system, and ANDROID another operating system,and even GRABBING AWAY AdMob at the last minute, a company that AAPL had been trying to close a merger with. They they went and got into hardware, and phones.</p>

<p>Typical arrogant liberal &#8220;do no evil&#8221; but STEAL EVERYTHING, just change the paint on the cars you boosted.</p>

<p>So, GOOGLE is the enemy now?</p>

<p>Most would say so, but old cranky Tan, the Neanderthal knuckle dragging antediluvian dinosaur here on the AFB, has a different perspective here. Let me try and lay that out, so you left coast green boys, can rip into me for being so cranky and cantankerous.</p>

<p>I love Apple, despite it being seen as a bastion of pinko commie greenies and aging flower children. Why? Because they make things that NORMAL PEOPLE &#123; unlike us here, and geeks around the world &#125; can actually pick up, and work, without poring over user manuals, and tweaking and twiddling every obscure setting just to make the darned things work. AND the biggest thing of all, when it doesn&#8217;t work, make an appointment at the Apple Store, take the sucker in, give it to the Genius, say to  him &#8220;Make this WORK please,&#8221; and they DO! Praise the Lord, pass the moonshine, and kiss the Genius!</p>

<p>But my &#8220;problem&#8221; with Apple personally, is their SLOW almost glacial like roll outs of the cutting edge of things, such issues as connectivity with FAST Net Servers, USB3, and other matters, including processors, come AFTER the Windoz people have been selling them for months, sometimes years. </p>

<p>And the penny pinching, like sub par cameras and no flash, and nickel dimeing you to death on peripherals and cables are just annoying.</p>

<p>But now, with ANDROID and CHROME breathing down their necks, and others coming in for BLOOD, Apple cannot afford to sit on their laurels, and leisurely issuing a tweak here, and a diddle there, calling them upgrades. If they don&#8217;t hit the metal HARD NOW, and get out and move FASTER than they are used to moving, they will, mark my words here, WILL&#8230;be AGAIN where they were when Bill Gates the MOLE, came in a grabbed the GUI and MOUSE and took away their markets, or when VHS took BETAMAX to the cleaners. Being &#8220;better&#8221; is only a temporary situation in these arenea&#8217;s you have to be WAY BETTER, MUCH FASTER, and move so fast the &#8220;Jonny-come-latelies&#8221; cannot catch you. Recently, that hasn&#8217;t been the case.</p>

<p>So, as much as I despise GOOG and their underhanded ways, IF THE BOYS AT CUPERTINO are as P.O.&#8216;ed as the press makes them out to be, the next round of &#8220;improvements&#8221; needs to be full bore ahead, MOVE UP all the pending goodies, and LOAD UP this years releases with EVERYTHING.</p>

<p>But the iPad shows me that they haven&#8217;t learned that lesson yet. You have a camera that isn&#8217;t there, connectivity in and out limited, and they plan on nickel and dimeing you death with the cables, and input output devices.</p>

<p>Maybe GOOG needs to nip at their heels even more?
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>AAPL Intraday Updates</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78264/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78264</id>
      <published>2010-03-14T14:23:35Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>DawnTreader</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>iPad pre-orders are off to a roaring start. Will last week&#8217;s advances in AAPL continue this week?
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Political rants</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/77994/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.77994</id>
      <published>2010-01-25T20:24:53Z</published>
      <updated>2010-01-25T20:29:39Z</updated>
      <author><name>Tommo_UK</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>This is for exiled posts unsuited to their topics <img src="http://www.macobserver.com/imgs/smileys/icon_smile.gif" width="20" height="20" alt="smile" style="border:0;" /></p>

<p>Whatever happened or was posted was literally years ago, so get the f over it ok? </p>

<p>Time to move on.. enough with this petty political bickering. Got a political rant? Post it here and get it off your chest. This topic is NO HOLDS BARRED so say whatever you want. Political correctness does not exist in this topic, so nobody get offended at what anyone says, but try to keep it at least rational, reasonable, and above all, logical. I don&#8217;t care if you think white people are trash, black presidents are stupid, republicans hate gays or democrats want to rape your kids&#8217; trust fund to pay for medicare. Just get it off your chest ok? Knock yourselves out, just keep it out of the other topics!
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>iPad Pre&#45;Orders/Post Your Numbers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78241/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78241</id>
      <published>2010-03-09T09:56:43Z</published>
      <updated>2010-03-12T22:45:19Z</updated>
      <author><name>Hamourabi</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>starting friday 12th Apple accepts preorders and reservations for iPad on the online store and in the brick and mortar stores. There might be some info relating to the public interest and the number of reservations for the iPad. Could this have some impact on AAPL next week?
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>AAPL 12&#45;Month Price Targets</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78227/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78227</id>
      <published>2010-03-07T00:10:35Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>DawnTreader</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>I&#8217;ve just posted my new AAPL 12-month price target at <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Ftwilightjunction.blogspot.com%2F">Eventide</a>. </p>

<p>My calculations work out to $384 per share. In light of Friday&#8217;s closing price it&#8217;s not as big of a jump in price as it might have been viewed just a few months ago.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Apple Sues HTC</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78197/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78197</id>
      <published>2010-03-02T09:36:38Z</published>
      <updated>2010-03-02T09:37:26Z</updated>
      <author><name>rattyuk</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <blockquote><p>CUPERTINO, Calif., March 2, 2010 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/&#8212;Apple(R) today filed a lawsuit against HTC for infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone&#8217;s user interface, underlying architecture and hardware. The lawsuit was filed concurrently with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. District Court in Delaware.</p>

<p>&#8220;We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We&#8217;ve decided to do something about it,&#8221; said Steve Jobs, Apple&#8217;s CEO. &#8220;We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketwatch.com%2Fstory%2Fapple-sues-htc-for-patent-infringement-2010-03-02%3Fsiteid%3Dnbsh">Press Release HERE</a>
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>I have just felt a disturbance in the force&#8230;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78268/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78268</id>
      <published>2010-03-15T14:38:47Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>rattyuk</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>...as if a million geeks all suddenly called out &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>

<p>Well it looks like Microsoft is just going to copy Apple, yet again.</p>

<blockquote><p>We just got out of a meeting with Microsoft&#8217;s Todd Higgs, who dropped a little bombshell on us: the only official way to get apps on a Windows Phone 7 Series device will be to download them from the just-detailed Windows Phone Marketplace. That means developers will have to abide by Microsoft&#8217;s technical and content guidelines in order to make it in, with the very real possibility of rejection&#8212;sound familiar? Todd told us Microsoft plans to avoid Apple-style submission headaches by making the process transparent and predictable, with a group of Microsoft execs regularly meeting to examine edge cases and refine the guidelines as needed, but even the best intentions can be led astray by a sexy app or two. We also got some additional details on Marketplace and how it&#8217;s going to work, catch the highlights after the break.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.engadget.com%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fconfirmed-marketplace-will-be-the-only-way-to-get-apps-on-windo%2F">Engadget has the details&#8230; </a></p>

<p>BTW good luck with those meetings guys&#8230; It&#8217;s a minefield.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>OT: political compass test</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78215/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78215</id>
      <published>2010-03-05T01:38:05Z</published>
      <updated>2010-03-05T01:40:28Z</updated>
      <author><name>Eric Landstrom</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>I found something that is fun: <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politicalcompass.org%2F">A political compass test</a>. </p>

<p>I&#8217;m a bit on the authoritarian side but I can explain it: I&#8217;m lawful. <br />
My political compass results are:</p>

<p>Economic Left/Right: 0.00<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.03</p>

<p><img src="http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=0.00&amp;soc=1.03"  alt='pcgraphpng.php?ec=0.00&amp;soc=1.03' /></p>

<p>Take the test and post your results.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Mac Unit Shipment Predictions</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/forums/viewthread/78256/" />      
      <id>tag:macobserver.com,2010:tmo/forums/viewthread/.78256</id>
      <published>2010-02-18T13:31:29Z</published>
      <updated>2010-03-12T22:39:23Z</updated>
      <author><name>capablanca</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>OK, we are halfway through the quarter again.&nbsp; Time for wild speculation on 2Q Mac shipments.&nbsp; I kicked things off last quarter in mid November with a then wildly optimistic 3.15mm units.&nbsp; This quarter I am also feeling very good.&nbsp; But maybe not quite as good.</p>

<p>No Windows 7 halo any longer; maybe a little drag from the coming iPad.&nbsp; I am penciling in 2.85mm for 2Q.</p>

<p>What say you?
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>


</feed>