Going off the board…
I’m going completely on a limb and away from the above suggestions:
The brick is a device in the size range between a Mac Mini and portable drive. It is intended to be light weight and highly portable, but also entirely dependent on other devices to operate.
It will:
1) Serve as a complete repository for a users information (think of the Home on iPod, where a home folder and all settings were retained on an iPod for portability).
2) Potentially include a low-end processor and connectivity to other devices i/o (monitor, keyboard, mouse). The processor could be scaled up dynamically (think x-grid) if connected to another host computer.
3) Or be entirely dependent on the processor of the device it’s connected to (tower, laptop, iPhone), allowing the user of the “brick” to have complete access to all their data, apps and settings no matter what computer they’re using.
Target customers would be those in creative fields who frequently move among computers, ie:
1) photographers, who work with Mac Pros in the office/studio, but MacBook Airs in the field
2) video pros, who are on location with MBPs, but in the office with MacBooks
3) creative pros, who need access to lots of data, but could suffice with their iPhones to run a presentation on the “brick” while it is connected to a projector.
From a sales perspective:
1) Facilitates the ability for a person to seamlessly move from a primary computer to multiple computers (ie: “now that I can make a MB Air fit into an easy work flow with my tower, it makes sense to buy one.”)
2) All the iPhone users have the ability to buy a “brick”—which can either be an accessory for their iPhone, but also be a “try me” mac when connected to their existing monitor, keyboard mouse (like the mini)


