The Mac Observer

 
   
28 of 45
28
Elliott Wave Analysis (Archive)
Posted: 23 June 2009 11:25 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 406 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
alice - 23 June 2009 11:17 AM

Mace - How does your EW count of AAPL fit in with what Neely is predicting?

If Neely is right, AAPL is in wave E of Cycle IV mad.  AAPL would break below $80.  Let’s pray that he is wrong.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 11:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 407 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2269
Joined  2007-04-26
Mace - 23 June 2009 11:25 AM
alice - 23 June 2009 11:17 AM

Mace - How does your EW count of AAPL fit in with what Neely is predicting?

If Neely is right, AAPL is in wave E of Cycle IV mad.  AAPL would break below $80.  Let’s pray that he is wrong.

Take it from someone who knows….praying doesn’t help.  frown

 Signature 

Steph apple
Id quot circumiret, circumveniat

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 02:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 408 ]
Mac Genius
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  798
Joined  2007-06-14
Mace - 23 June 2009 09:18 AM

Max pain (Jul)=$125, max pain (Aug)=$145, good start smile  and max pain (Oct)=$125.
Yesterday, AAPL peaked at $141.56 and down hard today.  Is in wave two for sure.  Should be in third wave of wave c of wave two big grin, 2.c.iii roll eyes.

Mace,

We can see another different from $146.40: Count for an abc (c=a, today c.4=$135.10) and we get $129s. And there is EMA50. It is similar in NDX and SPX…

 Signature 

less is more: Mies Van der Rohe; ok but more is more: Rem koolhass
one more thing: Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 03:55 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 409 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
chinabox - 23 June 2009 02:16 PM
Mace - 23 June 2009 09:18 AM

Max pain (Jul)=$125, max pain (Aug)=$145, good start smile  and max pain (Oct)=$125.
Yesterday, AAPL peaked at $141.56 and down hard today.  Is in wave two for sure.  Should be in third wave of wave c of wave two big grin, 2.c.iii roll eyes.

Mace,

We can see another different from $146.40: Count for an abc (c=a, today c.4=$135.10) and we get $129s. And there is EMA50. It is similar in NDX and SPX…

What’s the difference?  Now in 2.c.v.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 04:08 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 410 ]
Power User
RankRank
Total Posts:  149
Joined  2008-10-10

Mace - If aapl closes above Jul max pain of $125 but below Aug max pain of $145 then aapl is no longer in multi month rally.  Correct?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 04:17 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 411 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
alice - 23 June 2009 04:08 PM

Mace - If aapl closes above Jul max pain of $125 but below Aug max pain of $145 then aapl is no longer in multi month rally.  Correct?

Still in multi-month rally.  In fact, if AAPL hits $130 tomorrow and bounce up, good chance that it will close around max pain (Aug) on Jul OE.  I’ve placed a conditional buy of Aug calls if AAPL is trading less than $130.  A wave two can be a 1:1 zigzag as pointed out by chinabox i.e. completes at $129s or 1:1.618 i.e completes at $122s.  Hopefully is $129s not $122s.  Any price lower than $122s, panic mode.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 04:38 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 412 ]
Power User
RankRank
Total Posts:  149
Joined  2008-10-10
Mace - 23 June 2009 04:17 PM
alice - 23 June 2009 04:08 PM

Mace - If aapl closes above Jul max pain of $125 but below Aug max pain of $145 then aapl is no longer in multi month rally.  Correct?

Still in multi-month rally.  In fact, if AAPL hits $130 tomorrow and bounce up, good chance that it will close around max pain (Aug) on Jul OE.  I’ve placed a conditional buy of Aug calls if AAPL is trading less than $130.  A wave two can be a 1:1 zigzag as pointed out by chinabox i.e. completes at $129s or 1:1.618 i.e completes at $122s.  Hopefully is $129s not $122s.  Any price lower than $122s, panic mode.

Which Aug calls(strike price) will you be buying when/if aapl < 130?  Also, from reading other AFB posts, aapl is believed generally to move sideways during the summer months and start to move up in the fall.  Zeke mentioned in several of his posts and that Aug is the time to buy. (that’s what I remember).

[ Edited: 23 June 2009 04:59 PM by alice ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 June 2009 05:06 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 413 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
alice - 23 June 2009 04:38 PM

... Which Aug calls(strike price) will you be buying when/if aapl < 130?  Also, from reading other AFB posts, aapl is believed generally to move sideways during the summer months and start to move up in the fall.  Zeke’s mentioned in several of his posts.

$135.  Zeke is referring to the Apple Cycle, all AFB oldies are aware of this Cycle.  Apple tends to bottom between May-Jul and peak between Nov-Jan.  For broad market, Wall Street have these sayings:

Sell in May and come back in Sep.
Christmas rally.  Rally in late Nov till Christmas.
Jan effect.  Market up in Jan mean up for the year.
Apr effect.  Sell winners to raise cash for tax.

Above phenomenon is visible so long there are no major events masking them.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 June 2009 12:27 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 414 ]
Mac Genius
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  798
Joined  2007-06-14
Mace - 23 June 2009 03:55 PM
chinabox - 23 June 2009 02:16 PM
Mace - 23 June 2009 09:18 AM

Max pain (Jul)=$125, max pain (Aug)=$145, good start smile  and max pain (Oct)=$125.
Yesterday, AAPL peaked at $141.56 and down hard today.  Is in wave two for sure.  Should be in third wave of wave c of wave two big grin, 2.c.iii roll eyes.

Mace,

We can see another different from $146.40: Count for an abc (c=a, today c.4=$135.10) and we get $129s. And there is EMA50. It is similar in NDX and SPX…

What’s the difference?  Now in 2.c.v.

My bad… I thought you talked about 3rd of w2. Sorry

Bottom was $132.88, but were is 2.c.v?. It seems a zigzag from $141.56. Weird pattern… IMO it is not ended.

 Signature 

less is more: Mies Van der Rohe; ok but more is more: Rem koolhass
one more thing: Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 June 2009 12:45 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 415 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
chinabox - 24 June 2009 12:27 PM

... Bottom was $132.88, but were is 2.c.v?. It seems a zigzag from $141.56. Weird pattern… IMO it is not ended.

Confounded me too.  The only reason I can come up with is 2.c is a triangle.

2.c.(a)=$141.56 to $132.88
2.c.(b)=$132.88 to ... in progress.

However, is logical from a channel line perspective.  It bounces off the lower channel line joining all the bottom since Apr.

Edit:  If AAPL is tracing a triangle since $141.56, it is more consistent with a wave four i.e. preferred count.  Hehe, sometime behave like preferred count, sometime behave like best-fit count.  Need to consult Glenn Neely’s book.

[ Edited: 24 June 2009 12:55 PM by Mace ]
 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 June 2009 01:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 416 ]
Mac Genius
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  798
Joined  2007-06-14
Mace - 24 June 2009 12:45 PM
chinabox - 24 June 2009 12:27 PM

... Bottom was $132.88, but were is 2.c.v?. It seems a zigzag from $141.56. Weird pattern… IMO it is not ended.

Confounded me too.  The only reason I can come up with is 2.c is a triangle.

2.c.(a)=$141.56 to $132.88
2.c.(b)=$132.88 to ... in progress.

However, is logical from a channel line perspective.  It bounces off the lower channel line joining all the bottom since Apr.
...

Triangle… could be. Lets see where it stops.

 Signature 

less is more: Mies Van der Rohe; ok but more is more: Rem koolhass
one more thing: Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 June 2009 09:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 417 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07
sstenner - 23 June 2009 11:29 AM
Mace - 23 June 2009 11:25 AM
alice - 23 June 2009 11:17 AM

Mace - How does your EW count of AAPL fit in with what Neely is predicting?

If Neely is right, AAPL is in wave E of Cycle IV mad.  AAPL would break below $80.  Let’s pray that he is wrong.

Take it from someone who knows….praying doesn’t help.  frown

Louis Naviellier and a few other think tech sector is about to breakout.  However, he prefers AMZN and RIMM evil even though he admitted that Apple is on a tear, my take is because of SJ’s health.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 June 2009 12:20 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 418 ]
Power User
RankRank
Total Posts:  145
Joined  2008-04-12
Mace - 23 June 2009 11:11 AM

If we’re right that it is in wave two and not E of a IV, then should see $170-$180 by Sep/Oct and over $200 (I computed it as $230) before Jan 10.  Don’t know how to compute probability.  However, I do know that for it to happen, AAPL must not break below 52-week EMA or close below max pain (Jul) on OE.

That’s good to know - that at least there’re counts that support that view.  Thanks again for the update!

EDIT - PS sorry don’t have bloomberg with me right now.  What’s the current 52 wk EMA? Thanks!

[ Edited: 25 June 2009 12:24 AM by Lord Farkward ]
Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 June 2009 12:47 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 419 ]
Apple Fellow
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10789
Joined  2003-08-07

According to this weekly chart, 52-week EMA is $121.75.  Weekly technicals is bullish.

 Signature 

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.  - Steve Jobs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 25 June 2009 09:00 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 420 ]
Mac Genius
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  655
Joined  2007-06-21
Mace - 25 June 2009 12:47 AM

According to this weekly chart, 52-week EMA is $121.75.  Weekly technicals is bullish.

Disagree. My weekly technicals are flagging a concern. Stochastics show greatly overbought and a divergence with price. This is exactly what I would expect at the top of a market. However confirmation will not happen for another week or two if the MAs cross over. The question is how long will it stay in this overbought territory? The daily shows the opposite. Oversold territory for stochastics, so we could get a shorter multiday rally soon.

So if I was a longer-term trader, I’d be watching the weekly very closely to get out. Then I would not get in until the stochastics go to oversold territory which will then be months down the road.

 Signature 

“Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again.”    - Jesse Livermore

Profile
 
 
   
28 of 45
28
 
‹‹ .Gov Speaks      No debt No money ››

Apple Stock Quote

  • AAPL: $222.2499. Change: -2.4001.
  • (Prices delayed up to 20 minutes.)
  • Discuss in our Apple Finance Board

Hot Topics

TMO Express

Join the TMO Express Daily Newsletter to get the latest Mac headlines in your e-mail every weekday. Find out more!

Top Deals From DealBrothers.com

Recent Features

Support The Mac Observer

We noticed you may be running AdBlock on your computer. It takes real money to run this site and to deliver the news, tips, and opinions you love to read.

If you wish to block the ads that pay for the creation of our content, we ask that you instead support TMO Directly, either with a $5 monthly recurring contribution, or a one-time donation of any amount of your choice. Thanks!

Subscribe with Paypal Donate with Paypal