VTBoy - 04 November 2009 08:44 AM
Great article and assessment as usual.
I am curious, even though you laid out your reasons, how confident are you that the US won’t start defending the dollar next year leading to a reversal, and perhaps a strong reversal once all the shorts get out of the US dollar carry trade. It seems inevitable that at some point .gov is going to have to try to reel in some of the spending and start defending against inflation. What do you know about what Apple does to hedge against currency fluctuations, and how much might that mute the effect in both directions?
I don’t think the government wants a strong dollar because it’s effect on the current account deficit. Import more goods, hence less domestic production and export less. The U.S. has always had a huge capital account surplus, which has led to a relatively strong dollar. We may import goods (current account) thus dollars flow out weakening the currency, yet those dollars are turned around and invested in U.S. assets, such as Treasuries.
The dollar hasn’t even weakened to the levels pre-crisis, when it was $1.65 to the Euro and $2 to the GBP. So, I think the dollar will weaken further, at least it won’t return to the levels of strength seen last fall when money poured into Treasuries, as well as other currencies weakened more relative to the USD.
Apple does hedge currency exchange, but hedges usually only go out 3-6 months, maybe occasionally longer. Therefore, Apple’s recent quarters Q3/Q4 were likely hedged at forex rates in effect during Q1/Q2. Thus, Apple’s hedges have expired, or will be expiring, therefore it will re-enter hedges at more favorable rate since the dollar has declined. Because of hedging, the effect, or rathe benefit of the weak dollar is delayed.