TI today announced they will demo IEEE 1394b capable devices at an INTEL trade show. What’s significant about this is that the infrastructure to support Firewire 2 (IEEE 1394b) is mostly in place. The new standard will allow Firewire protocol to be transmissable over fiber and lower quality copper lines, thus broadening Firewire’s coverage, and the new standard in backwards compadible with the current Firewire standard.
Still, USB 2.0 is ramping up too. At first glance, these two standards appear to be competing. Both claim high speed buses, hot and hot swappable connectivity, and distances of about 300 feet. The biggest difference, however, is that USB 2.0 offers 480mbps while Firewire 2 gives a whopping 1.6Gbps with a potential of hitting3.2Gbps. ( http://www.everythingusb.com/usb2/faqa.htm#A1 )( http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0525ieee.html )
So, basically the same reasoning that exists today for having both on your Mac will exist when these two standards become widely available.
The question is, does it make sense to include both standards? Would it be prudent just to offer a box that has 3 bus types (internal bus, networking bus, and Firewire or USB) or continue to offer 4 buses? If you had to pick, which would it be? Which do you think peripheral makers will back? (That’s the key, I think.)




11” MacBook Air 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5: $829.00 Delivered
Samsung S22B300B 21.5” LED Backlit LCD Monitor: $129.99 Delivered
Canon imageCLASS Monochrome Multifunction Laser Printer: $129.99 Delivered
