How to Train Your Dragon. And Apple TV+ Viewers

2 minute read
| Analysis

 

Big Bird and Cody and Apple TV+

Big Bird and Cody and Apple TV+

Ever since we first learned about Apple’s original TV content service, we also learned about the effort to develop really high quality content. Shows would be heavy on exciting, captivating stories with very capable actors and light on brutality and obscenity.

There was almost the feeling that this kind of content, in line with Apple’s traditional values for quality products that respect the customer, would be all that’s required for success. A bit of hubris perhaps?

While other streaming services also have quality content, the parallel focus on volume of material and broad audience demographics means that some content will be gruesome or distasteful to many. Apple’s aim has been to avoid that and maintain a family-friendly approach. That doesn’t mean milquetoast, drama free content. After all, compelling human endeavors are often full of strife. But the presentation need not be stomach-turning.

Then Disney came along with Disney+. The Disney label is synonymous with family entertainment. And Disney has a boatload of it while Apple is just getting started. I discussed that dilemma here:

[Leaked Pricing for Apple TV+ is Certainly a Trial Balloon.]

The basic problem is that the Disney+ announcement very early in 2019 blew Apple’s family angle ace in the hole out of the water. Ever since that announcement by Disney, Apple executives have probably been asking themelves how to counter Disney+. And the recently announced Disney+ pricing of US$6.99/month poured on the coals and called into question the presumed pricing of $9.99/month by Apple.

Demand Creation

The solution appears to be a concerted marketing effort. Our Charlotte Henry pointed this out recently.

[Apple is Starting to Take Being in Media Seriously.]

For instance, in April, Apple hired Danielle DePalma from Lionsgate as a senior executive on its video marketing team. DePalma had previously led marketing and social media campaigns for the Hunger Games. A month later, Disney’s Chiara Cipriani joined as Director of Video Services in London.

The suggestion here is that appealing to the viewer’s intellectual side with notions of quality content alone (read: boring) didn’t seem to be working as well as thought. It came time to crank up a marketing campaign which, by its design, creates excitement and an appetite for the content. That’s called Demand Creation.

There are tried-and-true industry techniques for manufacturing appetite.

  • Cleverly constructed trailers [now, finally appearing]
  • Tantalizing, paid promos amidst other, similar existing media
  • Social media buzz, exploding exponentially
  • Social media viewer involvement as stakeholders
  • Actor appearances at, say, Comic-Con, further involving and exciting the fans.

And so on.

That Apple understood that demand needed to be created, not presumed, has been just part of the process for the new kid on the streaming TV block.

Now we wait to see how that goes.

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
gGrantwab95 Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
wab95
Member
wab95

A sober assessment, John. I particularly like your list for manufacturing appetite, and find little to quibble with. Personally, I think that Apple’s major headwind is expanding number of competitors in this space, all of whom are creating proprietary content pay silos. Irrespective of quality, and there is quality content to be had on all of these, having yet one more pay well for even the most enthusiastic content consumers in the face of a contracting global economy that may be careening towards a global recession is tantamount to death by a thousand <$10 cuts. Apple's chief nemesis, apart from… Read more »

gGrant
Member
gGrant

None of this recession talk, please. Apple’s only business model has been to keep increasing prices until they get rid of the undeserving masses and sell to only the crème de la crème of society, who will surely pay $10 for Apple! content. That’s Apple’s future.