The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Apple Wins Initial Ruling Against 3 News Web Sites (UPDATE)

Apple Wins Initial Ruling Against 3 News Web Sites (UPDATE)

by , 1:00 AM EST, March 4th, 2005

Apple Computer can force three Mac news Web sites to disclose where they got confidential information about about an unreleased Apple product, a San Jose, Calif. judge tentatively ruled Thursday. A full hearing on the matter is set for Friday.

Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg refused to protect the publishers of AppleInsider.com, PowerPage.org, and ThinkSecret.com from Apple's request that the three Mac news sites turn over records that could disclose who their sources were regarding stories about an un-announced audio hardware product code named "Asteroid" or "Q97".

Kleinberg offered no explanation for the preliminary ruling, which was handed down March 2, but revealed in court papers Thursday.

"We're disappointed that the tentative ruling was a denial," said Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney Kurt Opsahl, in a prepared statement. "We will now concentrate on making our case before Judge Kleinberg, Friday.'

Mr. Opsahl previously said that if the court decision did not go in its favor, the EFF would seek a writ from the Calif. Court of Appeals that would protect the journalists from disclosing information about their sources.

EFF lawyers argued Thursday that while the Uniform Trade Secrets Act holds those who receive trade secrets liable if they knowingly disseminate confidential information, Web sites and their journalists are protected by the California Constitution, the California Evidence Code, and the First Amendment and that the case threatens the basic freedoms of the press. The subpoenas should not be permitted because Internet journalists deserve the full protection of traditional print and broadcast journalists, the brief said.

In December, Apple filed a seven-page "John Doe" lawsuit and requested the owners of three Mac news Web sites produce all "documents relating to the identity of any individual or individuals who have knowledge regarding the source of posts on its site disclosing information about the product."

On February 16, Apple agreed to not serve subpoenas on the three Mac news sites seeking information on who allegedly leaked product secrets until the court held Thursday's hearing on the matter.

Recent TMO Headlines - Updated February 21st

Tue, 6:21 PM
Apple Remote Desktop Updated with Touch Bar Support
Tue, 4:07 PM
Here’s the TV Set-Top Box Apple Could Have Built: Caavo
Tue, 2:47 PM
New iPad Pro and iPhone SE Report - TMO Daily Observations 2017-02-21
Tue, 11:51 AM
Apple Using PrimeSense Tech for iPhone 8 3D Front Facing Camera
Tue, 9:00 AM
Stress Blocks: $14.99
Tue, 5:19 AM
Rumors about March Apple Event for iPhone SE and iPads Get Serious
Mon, 7:24 PM
Game of Thrones 'A Dance with Dragons' iBooks Enhanced Edition on Preorder
Mon, 5:53 PM
Returning to U.S. With iPhone? What Are Your Rights?
Mon, 4:48 PM
Hidden Folks is the Whimsically Fun Hidden Object Game You Need on Your iPhone and iPad
Mon, 4:31 PM
macOS Sierra: Delete And Reinstall 1Password To Refresh Certificate [Update]
Mon, 4:05 PM
TMO Background Mode: Interview with Open Source Developer & Former Apple Manager Jordan Hubbard
Mon, 2:10 PM
Apple's Facial Recognition Plans, the AI Race - TMO Daily Observations 2017-02-20
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!