The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Columnist: The Secret Behind Mac and PC Price Comparisons

Columnist: The Secret Behind Mac and PC Price Comparisons

by , 1:15 PM EDT, June 8th, 2007

For as long as PCs and Macs have existed, people have debated whether PC prices are lower. The promise of the Intel Macs was that all that would finally be put to rest, and it has been, but a key wrinkle remains, according to Computerworld on Friday.

Scot Finnie, who recently moved from PCs to a Mac, set out to do the best price comparison possible on similarly capable PCs and Macs. What he found was that, "If you start with Apple's relatively short list of SKUs ... and then look for comparable Windows machines, you'll find that Apple bests the competition in some ways and not in others, but the pricing overall is surprisingly on par."

Indeed, it has been possible in the past to buy very low end PCs, but if one restricts the search to name brand models [from HP and Dell], that's just no longer true. What is true is that Apple's simpler product line leaves some holes, while PCs tend to have a model and price for every need. Filling those holes creates prices points that can be found both below and above similar Macs.

"The key to the perception that Macs are more expensive is that Apple offers very few in-between models," Mr. Finnie wrote. The author looked at and researched a significant number of systems from Sony, Dell, HP and Apple to back up that assertion.

The author concluded, "When you configure low-end and midrange notebooks and desktops, you'll find that except at the very bottom of the heap, Windows machines are roughly comparable in price to Macs. There are fewer Mac models, so if your needs vary from what Apple has decided on, you may find a Windows model that costs less for you. But Apple's choices make a lot of sense for most people, and when you do the point-by-point comparison, Apple is actually a better value for some needs."

This reporter notes that, in the past, IT managers dedicated to the idea of buying a PC when a Mac would do, have exploited that interpolation effect to always find a PC just a little less capable and a little less expensive in order to justify its purchase. While this PC industry practice will probably continue forever, and helps perpetuate the myth, Apple's coarser product matrix may be a contributer to higher gross margins.

That's probably hard for Apple to pass up, even if it does introduce a slight penalty competing in the enterprise. It also makes selecting a Mac a lot easier for those overloaded with the minutiae of specifications.

Recent TMO Headlines - Updated March 23rd

Fri, 3:14 PM
Mind Chaser's Collection of Big Tech Spying Articles
Fri, 2:45 PM
Fake AT&T 5G E Could Be Slower Than 4G
Fri, 2:44 PM
Apple's Newest Surprise is Occasionally Settling for Second Best
Fri, 2:42 PM
Sans Forgetica: The Font That Helps You Remember!
Fri, 2:31 PM
We Finally Have a Super Mario Party Update
Fri, 2:24 PM
Wireless PowerBeats Could Arrive in April
Fri, 2:05 PM
PDF Converter OCR 6 for Mac Lifetime License: $15
Fri, 1:59 PM
Kickstarter Claps Back Against Unionization Attempts
Fri, 1:38 PM
NYT vs Apple News, Apple's 30 Percent – TMO Daily Observations 2019-03-22
Fri, 1:36 PM
Apple Music Browse Tab Redesigned
Fri, 12:59 PM
Air Power Could be Here by the End of March
Fri, 12:26 PM
Apple has Decided all iMacs are Pro-Devices
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!