The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Time Capsule's Term "Server Grade" Examined

Time Capsule's Term "Server Grade" Examined

by , 2:45 PM EST, March 3rd, 2008

Apple uses the term "server grade" in its description of the hard disk in the Time Capsule. On Monday, The Register discussed a Time Capsule that was taken apart, and Tony Smith concluded that the term may be used somewhat loosely.

One buyer who took his Time Capsule apart and provided photographs noted that it contained a Hitachi 1 TB Deskstar 7K1000, model HDS721010KLA330, designed for "networked storage servers." However, Hitachi's caveat is that, unlike the higher level model designed for rugged 24x7 server use, namely the Ultrastar A7K1000, the model in the Time Capsule is designed for "lower duty cycle environments in the enterprise storage hierarchy."

At Tidbits on Monday, it was reported that Apple senior product manager Jai Chulani said "server grade" means "the same 7200 rpm drives used for Apple's Xserve servers, and that they have a higher mean time between failure (MTBF) rating than consumer drives." That MTBF for "server grade" was placed at 1 million hours.

Mr. Smith at The Register noted that the technical term "server grade" lacks a standard definition, but felt that such a term, in his opinion, belonged to a drive more rugged than Hitachi's Deskstar.

In his blog on Saturday, Victor Cajiao agreed and pointed out that the Deskstar data sheet declines to provide an explicit MTBF number, something that server grade drives, like the Barracuda ES.2 drives, typically do.

In any case, it seems that Apple's industry term, intended to convey a simple idea, is getting some close scrutiny from observers. Not helping matters is the generally recognized idea that drive manufacturers themselves use estimation methodologies for MTBF that is regarded as optimistic. Despite that, higher MTBFs are still better than lower MTBFs -- at least when users get to know what they are.

Recent TMO Headlines - Updated March 8th

Fri, 9:21 PM
Apple Pencil Needs an Eraser and Swipe Gestures for Cut, Copy, Paste, Undo, Redo
Fri, 3:26 PM
Mac App Electrum Wallet With Backdoor Spotted in Wild
Fri, 3:13 PM
Apple Renews ‘Dear...’ for Second Season on Apple TV+
Fri, 3:13 PM
Offsite Backups: Insurance for Treasured Files
Fri, 2:38 PM
InvisibleShield Launches a Non-Newtonian Fluid Screen Protector
Fri, 2:20 PM
Microsoft Adds M1 Support to Visual Studio Code
Fri, 2:10 PM
Jay Blahnik Shows Us Inside the Apple Fitness+ Studio
Fri, 1:53 PM
Developers Receiving US$500 Credits for Send Back Developer Transition Kit Mac Minis
Fri, 1:52 PM
Ray Liotta Joins Apple TV+ Series ‘In With The Devil’
Fri, 1:40 PM
2020 Smartwatch Sales Flat, But Apple Increases Market Share in Q4
Fri, 1:06 PM
Security Friday! Search Engines and Support - TMO Daily Observations 2021-03-04
Fri, 1:03 PM
Jamf Sees Boost From Strong Apple Enterprise Demand
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Daily Observations
  • TMO on Twitter!