Apple and Samsung Settle 7-Year Patent Battle, Terms Not Known

2 minute read
| Editorial

Apple and Samsung settled their long-running patent battle on Wednesday. After seven years, numerous appeals, and multiple courts that found Samsung to be a blatant copycat, the two companies have put an end to their fight. Terms of the deal are not known.

Believe it or not, those are two difference devices, an iPhone and a Galaxy

Samsung Copy Machine

Apple sued Samsung in 2011 for copying patented design elements in iOS and the original iPhone. Then CEO Steve Jobs promised to go thermonuclear against Android device makers for stealing his company’s work. Though the first verdict came in after Mr. Jobs passed away, Apple proved to the jury that Samsung willfully copied key aspects of both iPhone and iOS and won more than a billion dollars in damages.

Samsung, IP Thief

Samsung has a long history of stealing intellectual property, getting sued, losing, and then using the appeals process to drag the fight out for years, and that’s just what Samsung did in this case. The company got the damages reduced, and in a series of back and forth appeals, wound up owing Apple $539 million in damages as of May of this year.

Samsung vowed to appeal yet again, demanding yet another trial—again, this being the copycat’s strategy in many industries where it stole from its betters—as recently as June 13th.

Which brings in Wednesday’s news of a settlement. In Apple, Samsung more than met its match in the courtroom. Apple beat the Samsung on the merits of its case repeatedly, but more importantly, Apple didn’t need Samsung to leave the market to continue to do well in the market. In TVs and other electronics markets, Samsung would steal IP, use its superior logistics to monetize that stolen IP and put the hurt on the competition. Then Samsung would get sued, lose, and then drag the case out while sucking up market share with that stolen IP until the real innovators gave up.

Samsung was often able to settle for pennies on the dollar by that point, but it seems doubtful Apple would do that. Mind you, even if Samsung pays hundreds of millions in the settlement it won’t cover Apple’s court costs, but Apple had no need to settle for pennies on the dollar. Apple could afford to go all night long if necessary, beating Samsung every step of the way.

What Happens in a Secret Settlement, Stays in a Secret Settlement

The funny thing is that as many eyes as there were on this case, we may never know what those terms actually are. It’s conceivable one company or the other could leak it, or that the terms could enter as evidence in some future case, but in reality this information is probably locked up tighter than a drum.

Personally, I just hope however much money it was leaves a mark on Samsung.

4
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
CudaBoyJohn Kheitgeoduck Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
CudaBoy
Member
CudaBoy

Apple got hoisted by their own petard. So Apple can use the money to pay the 630 million they owe VernetX for stealing 4 patents; or the technology behind Apple Pay and fingerprint ID they stole from RSA SecurID… I guess it’s easier to sue your own vendor – at least you know the lawyers. All that money that could’ve gone to new ideas but noo..Apple leads in 10 year old toys… Yay Apple ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

John Kheit
Member
John Kheit

I disagree, it’s a myopic view, in my opinion. Samsung won this plainly. They dragged it on, waddles away at it, and there is no a public record of their humiliation as there should be as a final outcome. Furthermore, they will now continue to copy at Apple without restraint, and Apple will be very much be feckless about it, letting it just go on. It is the definition of loss. Also this is proof of Apple‘s incompetence in choosing and having good legal counsel. The patents they chose to pursue are among the stupidest in Apple‘s portfolio with regard… Read more »

John Kheit
Member
John Kheit

I disagree, it’s a myopic view, in my opinion. Samsung won this plainly. They dragged it on, waddles away at it, and there is no a public record of their humiliation as there should be as a final outcome. Furthermore, they will now continue to copy at Apple without restraint, and Apple will be very much fuck less about it, letting it just go on. It is the definition of loss Also this is proof of Apple‘s incompetence and choosing and having good legal counsel. The patents they chose to pursue her among the stupidest in Apple‘s portfolio with regard… Read more »

geoduck
Member
geoduck

Samsung’s cheque will bounce.