Apple’s Previously Public Roadmap Has Become Opaque

3 minute read
| Editorial

There was a time when it was fairly clear what Apple wanted to achieve in the marketplace. Not so much anymore.

Apple Park
This building was designed to inspire, but also execute.

Before the iPod was released in October, 2001, Apple was all about the Macintosh. And it was fairly clear where Apple wanted to go with it. The Think Different ad campaign clearly laid out Apple’s intentions. The transition to a UNIX-based Mac OS X in 2001 led to a focus on computer science, engineering, science, architecture, publishing, graphics and other pursuits of technical professionals.

The iPod folded music into our Mac lives as had never been done before. The iPod also introduced the notion of the digital hub, the center of our lives, tied down by the Mac, as it integrated and synced our still camera, movie camera, and MP3 player. USB became essential infrastructure. Apple’s clear focus on Rip and Burn created a sensation even as it touched a raw industry nerve. But Apple’s convictions were clear.

In concert with the iPod, the iTunes app became our central repository. It was a watering hole for our music, TV shows, movies, internet radio and podcasts. Even though it grew into a squirrely monster, it focused Apple’s and our attentions. There was an obvious plan afoot.

Today, we have iCloud. Again, it’s a central repository for storing and syncing all that we do. Mostly, it works well but also has its limits and idiosyncrasies. Apple uses it as a platform for emergent services, such as iOS-device backups and iCloud keychain.

Al of the above infrastructure developments carried with them the notion of Apple’s emerging strategy and roadmap. Apple’s products, services and company acquisitions could be sensibly placed in the context of the strategic picture Apple was building.

What’s the Plan?

But that obvious public plan by Apple appears more and more opaque. New Macs are announced at long and irregular intervals. The MacBook family is disjoint. The split-personality HomePod doesn’t know what it wants to be. Announced products like AirPower fail to ship. Key infrastructure, like the AirPort Extreme, vital to our privacy and security is abandoned. Apple is mesmerized by producing original TV content, but leaves it up to others to provide the desktop and home displays and needed connectivity to view it. Where is the legendary cohesive, overall public strategy that allows us to make sense of Apple’s actions? Where is the Apple Home?

Enter Amazon

Amazon’s ambitions are certainly clearer. Amazon’s recent announcement that it will be acquiring eero demonstrates that it wants to control key pieces of our internet lives. Ones that Apple is overlooking.

Apple says that it wants to protect our privacy and security, but its technical development, pubic roadmap and infrastructure leave it to others to implement in important ways. It almost seems that Apple is overly obsessed with the future; AR, health management, TV content and autonomous vehicles. But the company is paralyzed in its need to execute at a high level on current products. Unless it’s the iPhone.

This tells me the Apple executive team is having a hard time delegating responsibility for current products. Things we depend on, storage, displays, routers, servers are abandoned, not because they’re obsolete technology but because Apple has lost the talent and will to strategize how we need Apple the most. Unless it’s the iPhone.

Other companies, notably Amazon, Google and now Microsoft are constantly strategizing how their products and services can be of most utility to us. And insinuate themselves into our lives. (As with Google and education.) Apple’s penchant for secrecy means, today, there’s no public, coherent vision for how they’ll meet our overall needs. That means little accountability and lots of difficulty placing Apple’s actions and products into proper perspective.


Perhaps it’s time for a CRO, a Chief Roadmap Officer. Someone who can guide internal product focus while simultaneously communicating to customers. Not that Apple products are cool (they are), but how Apple is building a consistent infrastructure that meets all-inclusive customer needs for connectivity, productivity, privacy and security.

If Apple had been thinking like this all along, it would have acquired key internet infrastructure companies in the past. And bought the expertise it needed with eero today.

5
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
5 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
NedOld UNIX GuyCudaBoyJohn Kheit Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ned
Member
Ned

Seems pretty clear: Everything but the iPhone is a “hobby” as when the Apple TV was announced. It’s now a three legged stool with one solid and two wobbly legs. There were stories of a yacht Steve Jobs was building before he passed. I think he intended to travel and work remotely, with Ebenezer Cook being the Cupertino guy. Life doesn’t always work the way you’d like it to – It’s what happens while you’re busy making other plans (John Lennon). Tim probably freaked when Steve passed and it shows to this day. Unless a committed Apple do or die… Read more »

Old UNIX Guy
Member
Old UNIX Guy

I respectfully disagree … Apple does have a coherent strategy:

1. Make everything thinner, even if it means sacrificing functionality.
2. Remove all holes (i.e. ports).
3. Prevent users from upgrading anything.
4. Charge higher prices for everything.
5. Ship software on an annual schedule, even if it’s mostly non-functional crap.

Now we may not like or agree with that strategy, but that is very clearly their current strategy.

Oh, and John … you’ve got a rather unfortunate typo in the 3rd paragraph from the bottom … I think you meant to say that there’s no public, coherent vision.

Old UNIX Guy

Member
Russ Hilton

I believe that this is the best analysis of what Apple has become. Tim Cook may have been suited for the job, but I believe he has stepped away from the road map that Steve Jobs laid out for him.

CudaBoy
Member
CudaBoy

You can’t have a Roadmap without a Vision. Poor stumbly bumbly Timmy isn’t cut out for being a visionary type. What’s Timmy done except mind the product that Steve left – the iPhone? As of today he mumbles about “services” – great Timmy; oh, and the ARM chips Apple makes may make it into Macs – great – there goes the Pro business. 1st Apple abandons computers for dumb phones and now he wants to make Apple a services co. like a PayPal or MobilGas RFD tool??? Go F yourself Apple. Timmy hasn’t even made a decent “helper” like Alexa;… Read more »

John Kheit
Member
John Kheit

Great article John. Good stuff. Sadly, I think you may be giving them more credit than deserved that there is even some ‘opaque’ strategy we do not see.

The place seems like a den of fiefdoms. The opaqueness does help for lack of accountability, the “emotional support animal” of corporate America. Something to hide behind (along with ballooning R&D-to-nothing expenses) while incompetence grows.

Hope I’m wrong, fear I’m right.

Regardless, insightful piece, kudos!