The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
The Sorry State Of OS X and Webcams

The Sorry State Of OS X and Webcams

by , 11:00 AM EDT, April 23rd, 2002

"All I want to do is be able to wave at my girlfriend!" This is the sentence I kept hearing myself yelling as I desperately looked at webcam options for OS X. The hunt for this particular piece of equipment painfully reminded me of the dark days when you couldn't find a single game from the top five best seller list for the Mac.

For the record, there are a few Firewire webcams that list OS X support, but with a caveat. If you want to use the camera, for which you are usually paying over $100, in OS X you must also purchase a driver from another company! Of course, this little nugget of information isn't normally placed near the top of the product description. Nice. But at least it is officially possible to use one if you have the bandwidth and need optimal quality.

But what if you only have a 56K modem, like me, and only need a USB-based camera? The situation here is even worse. Your only options are to find a few of the available shareware or beta drivers and hope you find one that supports your chosen webcam. Or, you could work backwards: look at the beta driver and see which cameras it supports. Unfortunately the current choices on the list include mostly unavailable products. (If anyone knows where to find a Philips ToUcam Pro, please let me know!)

Now that we know how dismal the state of webcam driver support for OS X is, who do we blame? Do we blame the companies that make the cameras? Apple's new baby has been officially out for more than a year now. How difficult can it be to come up with a new driver for an operating system that is shipping on millions of new Macs? At the very least, include the third-party driver in the cost of the camera.

Does fault lie with Apple for dragging its feet in implementing low level standards for peripheral interface? Should we expect them to provide drivers like they do for other devices like digital cameras or CDROM drives? It does seem silly to have plug-and-play support for a $5,000 Nikon digital SLR but not for a $40 webcam.

How about placing blame on the people we normally overlook? Ourselves. Remember, if there is enough demand for a product, companies will fall over each other to supply it.

Until somebody decides to do something about it, I'll just be sitting here gathering strange looks as I wave at the screen of my iBook.

Recent TMO Headlines - Updated August 10th

Wed, 1:41 PM
Kuo Reports iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max Likely to See a Hefty Price Increase
Wed, 12:56 PM
Spotify Introduces new Home Feeds, Offers More Access to Music and Podcasts
Wed, 11:05 AM
Foxconn Earnings Beat Expectations Partly Due to Strong Sales of the iPhone 13
Wed, 10:57 AM
Apple Negotiating To Get Streaming Rights for Big Ten Athletic Events
Tue, 4:09 PM
Apple Increases iPhone 14 Order to 95 Million Units, Kuo Says No Supply Chain Impacts
Tue, 3:05 PM
Apple Releases 5th Developer Betas of iOS 16, iPadOS 16, watchOS9, macOS Ventura, More [U: 3rd Public Betas, Too]
Tue, 2:54 PM
Google Puts More Pressure on Apple to Adopt RCS with ‘Get the Message’ Campaign
Tue, 2:37 PM
Despite Keeping Things Private, Apple TV+ Continues to Show Dominance
Tue, 1:34 PM
Apple Partners with Kim Kardashian for Beats Fit Pro in Neutral Colors
Tue, 1:34 PM
Apple Brings Battery Percentage Back in iOS 16 beta 5: Who Gets it and Who Doesn't
Tue, 12:51 PM
Snapchat Brings Parental Controls Through New 'Family Center' Feature
Tue, 11:46 AM
Apple Pay Now Available in Malaysia in Partnership in MayBank, AmBank and Standard Chartered Bank
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Daily Observations
  • TMO on Twitter!