The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
The Sorry State Of OS X and Webcams

The Sorry State Of OS X and Webcams

by , 11:00 AM EDT, April 23rd, 2002

"All I want to do is be able to wave at my girlfriend!" This is the sentence I kept hearing myself yelling as I desperately looked at webcam options for OS X. The hunt for this particular piece of equipment painfully reminded me of the dark days when you couldn't find a single game from the top five best seller list for the Mac.

For the record, there are a few Firewire webcams that list OS X support, but with a caveat. If you want to use the camera, for which you are usually paying over $100, in OS X you must also purchase a driver from another company! Of course, this little nugget of information isn't normally placed near the top of the product description. Nice. But at least it is officially possible to use one if you have the bandwidth and need optimal quality.

But what if you only have a 56K modem, like me, and only need a USB-based camera? The situation here is even worse. Your only options are to find a few of the available shareware or beta drivers and hope you find one that supports your chosen webcam. Or, you could work backwards: look at the beta driver and see which cameras it supports. Unfortunately the current choices on the list include mostly unavailable products. (If anyone knows where to find a Philips ToUcam Pro, please let me know!)

Now that we know how dismal the state of webcam driver support for OS X is, who do we blame? Do we blame the companies that make the cameras? Apple's new baby has been officially out for more than a year now. How difficult can it be to come up with a new driver for an operating system that is shipping on millions of new Macs? At the very least, include the third-party driver in the cost of the camera.

Does fault lie with Apple for dragging its feet in implementing low level standards for peripheral interface? Should we expect them to provide drivers like they do for other devices like digital cameras or CDROM drives? It does seem silly to have plug-and-play support for a $5,000 Nikon digital SLR but not for a $40 webcam.

How about placing blame on the people we normally overlook? Ourselves. Remember, if there is enough demand for a product, companies will fall over each other to supply it.

Until somebody decides to do something about it, I'll just be sitting here gathering strange looks as I wave at the screen of my iBook.

Recent TMO Headlines - Updated March 29th

Wed, 11:47 AM
Weak Report Claims Touch ID Sensor Moving to the Back of iPhone 8
Wed, 10:47 AM
Apple Gives Developers First iOS 10.3.2 Beta
Wed, 9:00 AM
Private Internet Access VPN 2-Year Subscription: $59.95
Wed, 8:46 AM
iOS 10.3: Using "Find My AirPods"
Tue, 11:24 PM
Congress Says ISPs Can Sell Your Browser History on Party Line Vote
Tue, 7:09 PM
Apple Triples Supplier Sites Working In Energy Efficiency Program
Tue, 6:28 PM
You Can Opt Out of Sharing iCloud Analytics in macOS Sierra 10.12.4
Tue, 5:26 PM
macOS: Search Photos on macOS for Whatever You're Looking For
Tue, 4:18 PM
Developer Comments Go Live on App Store, Mac App Store
Tue, 3:07 PM
Samsung Plans to Refurbish and Sell the Recalled Note 7
Tue, 1:59 PM
Apple's New APFS File System, Developers Respond to App Store Reviews - TMO Daily Observations 2017-03-28
Tue, 11:01 AM
Element Blocks: The Coolest Periodic Table for Your Desk
  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!