Don’t Count on Kaby Lake Processors in the New MacBook Pro

MacBook Pro without Kaby Lake processor

With Intel’s Kaby Lake processors shipping and the MacBook Pro woefully overdue for a refresh, Apple could skip over Skylake and roll out new laptops with the latest chips—except that isn’t going to happen. Instead, Apple will most likely retire the aging Haswell chips it currently uses and finally move on to Skylake, and the really significant processor change won’t come until 2018 with Cannonlake.

MacBook Pro without Kaby Lake processor
Don’t hold your breath for Kaby Lake MacBook Pro models

Intel loves its code names, and considering how many processors the company makes, there are plenty to remember. Only a handful matter to Mac users, and for many the performance differences between a 2011 and 2015 MacBook Pro aren’t that significant.

Deciphering Intel’s Code Names

Haswell, Skylake, Kaby Lake, and Cannonlake are all code names for Intel chipsets used in desktop and laptop computers. Haswell was introduced in 2013, Skylake followed in 2015, and Kaby Lake just started shipping to device makers.

Haswell used a 22nm process, while Skylake and Kaby Lake use a 14nm process, meaning the transistors packed on the chip are smaller. Skylake is an architectural change from Haswell because of its smaller process, and Kaby Lake is an iterative improvement over Skylake with reduced power consumption, better high resolution video, and built-in support for USB 3.1.

Where Kaby Lake is a minor refinement of Sky Lake, Cannonlake marks the next significant chipset change because it’ll use a 10nm process. Cannonlake isn’t shipping until 2017, which means it won’t show up in the MacBook Pro until 2018.

Apple first started using the Haswell chipsets in 2013 and for many Macs hasn’t moved on. Some dual-core Macs, however, are using Broadwell chips which are Haswell chips made with a 14nm process instead of 22nm.

Where’s Skylake?

So far, Skylake chipsets are used in the iMac and also the MacBook. We won’t see them show up in the painfully out of date Mac Pro because Intel’s Xeon chips are more appropriate there.

Skylake chipsets haven’t found their way into the MacBook Pro yet even though they’ve been shipping for about a year and have been used in the iMac for almost that long. They’re working well in the uber-thin MacBook, but considering they’re already a year old and Kaby Lake chipsets are making their way to manufacturers, it seems logical on the surface for Apple to jump from Haswell to the latest and greatest when it refreshes the MacBook Pro—but that isn’t how Apple rolls.

No Kaby Lake for You

The next MacBook Pro refresh will include Skylake chipsets and Kaby Lake won’t show up in Apple’s pro laptop line until some time in 2017, if at all. Kaby Lake won’t ship in the quantities Apple needs until next year, and doesn’t offer a significant enough improvement over Skylake to warrant waiting several more months before giving us new laptops.

Skylake will give the MacBook Pro CPU upwards of a 20% performance improvement, and around a 40% improvement for the integrated graphics processor. Battery life could be upwards of 30% better, too. Skylake also supports USB-C and Thunderbolt 3, both of which are expected on the new laptop.

Apple could wait for Kaby Lake to ship in the volume it needs, but everything it wants in the chipset is already available in Skylake—and Apple can get the quantities it needs right now. Couple that with the last processor upgrade for the MacBook Pro from Ivy Bridge to Haswell in 2013, and it’s time for a big refresh.

Based on the leaks so far, the new MacBook Pro will ship this fall with new processors, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C, and a touch sensitive OLED display in place of the row of function keys at the top of the built-in keyboard. The OLED display will serve as a dynamic key row showing app-specific functions.

The upside is that we’ll see a MacBook Pro refresh soon instead of several months into 2017. The downside is that Apple will be criticized for using year-old processors in new Macs even though the differences between Skylake and Kaby Lake aren’t that significant.

Apple could skip Kaby Lake chipsets all together considering how similar they are to Skylake. If so, that’ll give us around 18 months from this fall’s refresh before we see another big change, and instead of Kaby Lake it’ll be Cannonlake.

6 thoughts on “Don’t Count on Kaby Lake Processors in the New MacBook Pro

  • If I were running Apple…
    Ship a new mbp ASAP with Skylake. Include a modestly priced “upgrade” to Kaby Lake when the processor is available. That stops the revenue slide and gives those who have been waiting years for the next refresh a vastly improved machine with the new design, the latest cpu architecture and a path to Kaby Lake when it becomes available. Refresh the mbp in 2017 with Kaby Lake and a few other wants/needs (memory, screen, ssd, etc) before “back-to-school”. Refresh the mbp in 2018 with Cannon Lake and other must haves that are available

  • @MalibuArt and @RBDx3. Yes Intel has shipped both their Y- (previously Core M) and U-series chips to manufacturers, but those are only dual-core models and suitable for ultraportables and convertibles. It might be conceivable that Apple could use those for a Macbook Air update, but I doubt the Air will be updated. The Macbook Pro would use the H-series (quad-core) and iMacs would use the S-Series (also quad-core) chips. These “higher-end” Kaby Lake chips are not going to be available until early 2017, maybe end of 2016 at the earliest. Yes, Apple has received some early access to Intel chips in the past, but that was long ago and it’s already been reported that they have not been rumored to get early access to Kaby Lake.

  • Intel released Kaby Lake to manufacturing in June. It goes on retail sale at the end of this month / beginning of October. The optimizations to Kaby Lake over Skylake are SPECIFICALLY focused around things that benefit mobile devices the most (thinner 14nm die, improved TDP footprint, 4K rendering / encoding and improved battery life over Skylake). Not to mention, vastly improved native, on-board GPU improvements that would also fit perfectly for the upcoming MBP.

    The only other component that may have contributed to the delay (if one wants to say it’s actually a delay or just right on time) is that the top-end MBP will most likely (99.999% certain) run the latest AMD Polaris GPU for discreet graphics, just as the 2015 rMBP did with the Radeon R9 M370X.

    Apple will be launching new MBPs in October with Kaby Lake. Just in time for the holidays. That’s why we didn’t see / hear anything today.

  • The same day other sites reveal the Kaby Lake chips specifically designed for rMBP have already shipped in volume, TMO reports no chance. Any specific intelligence, secret source, anything? Intel supposedly gave Apple a big Christmas present hoping to grab a good portion of future ARM A-series chips on top of their LTE modem deal. The big question is: does Optane (whatever it really is) with its 1000x better SSD performance come with?

  • I could be wrong, very wrong, but hasn’t Intel shipped limited quantities of special versions of chips, just for Apple, ahead of volume production.. in the past? I’m thinking the original Intel Core Macs? If the rumors of a possible Apple/Intel partnership to produce future Ax chips is true, perhaps a limited quantity of Kaby Lake chips could be made available as part of those negotiations? Possible?

  • Kaby Lake … doesn’t offer a significant enough improvement over Skylake to warrant waiting several more months before giving us new laptops.

    The downside is that Apple will be criticized for using year-old processors in new Macs even though the differences between Skylake and Kaby Lake aren’t that significant.

    Thank you for clarifying. Now I know not to worry about a Skylake processor when they roll out the next generation MBP. They’re a big jump over what I have now (a 2012 Haswell). I’d rather have a 90% now than a perfect Kaby Lake next year…oh just a minute, if I wait a few more months I’ll get the Cannonlake…but if I wait a year more I’ll get the Ice Lake…but if I…

    I’m looking forward to October when they announce them.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.