US Courts to Samsung: No Really, You Copied the iPhone

| News

Samsung's latest request to have the big loss in its mobile device patent infringement fight with Apple reviewed earned a big nope from the U.S. Court of Appeals. The electronics maker asked for the full twelve judge panel to rehear its case following a three judge panel's ruling that Apple's win stands. Assuming Samsung continues to pursue the case, its next step is the U.S. Supreme Court.

Appeals Court says Samsung really did copy iPhone designAppeals Court says Samsung really did copy iPhone design

Samsung argued that the three judge panel was wrong when they left the original ruling against it in place. The court's response, according to the San Jose Mercury News, was a rejection without comment.

Samsung has been fighting to overturn a 2012 ruling where a Federal jury ruled it violated several iPhone and iPad-related patents with its own smartphone and tablet designs. Apple was awarded US$980 million in damages, and Samsung has been fighting ever since to get that ruling overturned.

The company's latest efforts included an amicus brief from several companies such as Google, Facebook, HP, and Dell who urged the Appeals Court to rule in Samsung's favor over concerns that the current ruling would hamper the development of new technologies. The companies said in their filing,

Should the court uphold Apple's victory and force Samsung to pay damages, it could open up other companies including Google to further patent infringement lawsuits.

In essence, the companies were asking the court to protect them from legal action if they copy protected technologies from competitors.

Samsung lost a second patent infringement case, too, although that ruling includes only $120 million in damages. The company is appealing that ruling as well.

The next move, assuming Samsung continues to pursue the case, is the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Judges decide which cases they will hear, so there isn't any guarantee they'll offer a ruling or that it'll go in Samsung's favor.

Samsung hasn't commented on the latest blow in its patent infringement fight with Apple. It's a safe bet that what they're saying off the record isn't, "Well, that went nicely. Let's go celebrate over lunch."

The Mac Observer Spin The Mac Observer Spin is how we show you what our authors think about a news story at quick glance. Read More →

It isn't a surprise that the U.S. Appeals Court refused to review its earlier ruling. It's next step is to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case.

Popular TMO Stories

Comments

geoduck

Unfortunately, all the court ruling and judgement notwithstanding several truths still hold:

Samsung still build a huge market share on the stolen IP. They will continue to profit from that for the foreseeable future.

Samsung will continue to steal IP from Apple and others. When they do the harmed party will take them to court which Samsung will drag out for another decade while they profit from the infringement. It’s a business plan that works.

Getting a judgement is one thing, collecting is another. Samsung can and will drag out actually paying for years, decades even. I doubt Apple will see a dime.

BurmaYank

‘Samsung will continue to steal IP from Apple and others. When they do the harmed party will take them to court which Samsung will drag out for another decade while they profit from the infringement. It’s a business plan that works.’

In my ignorance of all the legalities, I can only hope that, if Apple is not already somehow entitled to it, Apple will sue Samsung to recover all Apple’s litigation & associated costs throughout this lawsuit’s decades-long process, either before or after SCOTUS rejects Samsung’s appeal to it.

That I’d hope might extend this spanking sufficiently to discourage repetitions of this copy-cat’s defense strategy, if Samsung’s original adverse judgment did not do so sufficiently.

RonMacGuy

BurmaYank, still a drop in the well compared to the billions of profit they enjoyed. The legal system needs to respond MUCH quicker and begin to charge time value of money at a reasonable rate to offset the decades-delay of payment.

RonMacGuy

LOL, have you seen the new samdung gear watch?!?!? Talk about copying again!! They are pathetic!!

John Dingler, artist

“Google, Facebook, HP, and Dell…urged the Appeals Court to rule in Samsung’s favor over concerns that the current ruling would hamper the copying of new technologies” that Apple develops.

Paul Goodwin

Haha JD. Geoduck. Yes. That’s their business plan and it does work. They do it in other businesses too.

Log in to comment (TMO, Twitter or Facebook) or Register for a TMO account