The Mac Observer

Skip navigational links

You're viewing an article in TMO's historic archive vault. Here, we've preserved the comments and how the site looked along with the article. Use this link to view the article on our current site:
Leopard: Dictionary's Wikipedia Search

TMO Quick Tip - Leopard: Dictionary's Wikipedia Search

by , 7:30 AM EST, December 10th, 2007

Apple's Dictionary application is a handy resource, and a tool that I use on a regular basis. You can use it to check definitions and spelling on the fly, use it as a thesaurus, and in Leopard it can even search Wikipedia for you.

If you aren't familiar with Wikipedia, it's an online encyclopedia that's updated and maintained by the community that uses it. It's a great Web-based tool that's loaded to the gills with information on almost any topic you can imagine.

Accessing Wikipedia from Dictionary is easy. Here's what to do:

  • Launch Dictionary. It's hiding in your Applications directory.
  • Select Wikipedia from the source bar.
  • Enter a subject in the search field, and then press Return.


Dictionary can search Wikipedia.

Dictionary will dutifully track down and display the Wikipedia entry for your topic of choice, complete with active cross reference links and graphics. Cross references display in Dictionary when clicked, but clicking a graphic opens the full-size version in your default Web browser.

Dictionary isn't a replacement for a full-on Web browser, but it makes for a great research tool without the overhead -- and extra features -- that go along with a regular browser like Safari or OmniWeb.


Jeff Gamet is TMO's Morning Editor and Reviews Editor. He lectures, teaches and speaks on Mac OS X and design-related topics, and is the author of The Designer's Guide to Mac OS X from Peachpit Press.

if you have tips or tricks to share, or Mac-related questions you want answered.

Observer Comments

Show: Subjects Only | Full Comments
Close Name:Ruth Pearce Posts: 1 Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Subject: Association with Wikipedia is bad PR guys

Unfortunately, what seems like a helpful product has associated itself with what is certainly not a positive product. That is Wikipedia. A collapsing, unreliable and increasingly corrupt forum, whose reputation dips lower by the week.

Its a bit like saying your product is endorsed by the Bush administration. Bad PR guys. Sorry.

Close Name:brett_x Posts: 322 Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Subject: Welcome to the new reality

Quote
Ruth Pearce wrote:
Unfortunately, what seems like a helpful product has associated itself with what is certainly not a positive product. That is Wikipedia. A collapsing, unreliable and increasingly corrupt forum, whose reputation dips lower by the week.

Its a bit like saying your product is endorsed by the Bush administration. Bad PR guys. Sorry.


Ruth- I think you're struggling with the fact that everything that is printed is not necessarily true. In the "olden days", you used to be able to rely on the printed word. But the new reality is that you should question everything... especially if it is on the internet. The people that want to look something up on Wikipedia should know that and take it with a grain of salt. Keep in mind, kids these days are well aware of the 'truthiness' or lack-thereof of sites like Wikipedia. They won't grow up believing "It must be true if I read it." [Opinion] This generation will grow to be skeptical, rather than accept what they read. This is good. They will not be so easily led as past generations have. [/Opinion]
There is a wealth of [true] information there that would otherwise never have made it to the web in any useable/searchable way. As humans, we are becoming increasingly specialized in the knowledge we acquire. The basis of Wikipedia is to reach out to specialists in every aspect of the world we live in and capture some of that knowledge. It is a good resource to use in conjunction with other sources... which is why It's nice to see it related to the dictionary search.

Close Name:Guest
Subject:

Nice you to provide an alternative Ruth.

Wikipedia is a valuable resource. Particularly for the references. The "Talk" section is also extremely valuable as one can participate in debates over the content and wording of controversial subjects.

To completely ignore it, despite its flaws, and not practice critical thinking when you read it, is to needlessly live your life in ignorance.

Close Name:Guest
Subject: Really?

Wikipedia is a great resource, and it gets better by the day. Those that bash Wikipedia, are either being displaced by it, or have zero understanding of the power of collaborative editing

Comment on this Article


You cannot edit your comments.   You cannot delete your comments.

Comments are currently closed. Please email the author instead.


Recent Headlines - Updated November 22nd

Fri, 7:07 PM
Games - Soccer Sim Championship Manager 2010 Released for Mac
6:47 PM
Games - EA Publishes Original Monopoly for iPhone
6:15 PM
News - Original Apple I on Ebay for $50K, w/Letter from Steve Jobs
6:11 PM
Games - New iPhone Games: Secret of the Lost Cavern Ep 1, New DJ Nights, More
5:47 PM
Games - Star Trek D-A-C Game Headed to the Mac Next Month
4:57 PM
Product News - TidBITS Releases “Take Control of Syncing Data in Snow Leopard”
4:26 PM
John Martellaro's Blog - Particle Debris (week ending 11/20) Stationery Pads Go Poof
2:59 PM
Free on iTunes - Musée du Louvre, Art Lite, SketchBook Mobile X and More.
1:50 PM
Deal Brothers - Acer P215H bmid 21.5” Widescreen LCD Monitor:  $139.99
11:24 AM
TMO Appearances - Jeff Gamet Shares More Holiday Gift Ideas on MacJury
10:43 AM
Product News - Cocktail 4.5 for Leopard Adds QuickLook Cache Clearing
10:06 AM
News - Hack Enables Mac OS X 10.6.2 on Netbooks

The Mac Observer Reader Specials

  • __________
  • Buy Stuff, Support TMO!
  • Podcast: Mac Geek Gab
  • Podcast: Apple Weekly Report
  • TMO on Twitter!